Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

R L and Mita Dharia Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$130kYouth Development$58kFood & Nutrition$22kRecreation & Sports$19kHuman Services$5kPhilanthropy$4kEmployment$2kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$114k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITE FOR HER$2,500
SANDY ROLLMAN OVARIAN CANCER FOUNDATION$1,500
GIRLS INCORPORATED$1,000
WOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC$1,000
NO KID HUNGRY BY SHARE OUR STRENGTH$1,000
SHARE FOOD PROGRAM$1,000
KIDS AGAINST HUNGER PHILADELPHIA$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT: $2k → 22%SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT: $1k → 22%SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT: $1k → 22%SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT: $1k → 22%CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$235k · 21 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
7

Total granted

$235k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
0%

Still filing today

86%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF PHILADELPHIA DELAWARE AND SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +13%
  • KC
    KINGS COUNTY TENNIS LEAGUE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $19k · revenue +802%
  • UF
    Unite for HER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • AL
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSNgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +85%
  • JH
    JILLS HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • LA
    LISAS ARMY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children First Pa

Summary

Human Services
2
Save the Children Federation Inc

Save the children is an international nonprofit children's relief and development organization. our mission is to inspire breakthroughs in the way the world treats children and to achieve immediate and lasting change in their lives.

International
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

6
Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc

Vision A world without childhood brain tumors. Mission Care. Cure. Thrive.

Health
7
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
8
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
9
Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Mid-Atlantic Inc

The make-a-wish foundation of the mid-atlantic creates life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

10
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
11
Share Self-Help for Women With Breast Or Ovarian Cancer Inc

Share cancer support is a national, peer-led nonprofit organization that supports and educates anyone who has been diagnosed with breast or gynecologic cancer and provides critical information to the general public about signs, symptoms,…

Health
12
Feed the Children Inc

We are a global movement working to end child hunger in the u.s. and around the world. together with communities, we provide food, essentials, and opportunities so every child can survive and thrive.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Philadelphia Delaware and Susquehanna Valley and the most unlike its peers is Lisas Army Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%46%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,541

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION — $59,630 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $7,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $3,000 · Other+7 more — $10,251 · Other+7 moreCAPITAL FOR KIDS — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAPITAL FOR KIDSGIRLS INC — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF PHILADELPHIA DELAWARE AND SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY — $20,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATI…Unite for HER — $17,679 · HealthUnite for HERTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $2,507 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPI…AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $1,500 · Health+2 more — $1,600 · HealthKINGS COUNTY TENNIS LEAGUE — $18,500 · Recreation & SportsKINGS COUNT…THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC — $4,100 · Recreation & SportsTHE FIRST T…GIRLSTART — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsSANDY ROLLMAN OVARIAN CANCER FOUNDATION — $18,500 · PhilanthropySANDY ROLLM…MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS…SHARE FOOD PROGRAM — $7,500 · Food & NutritionKids Against Hunger Philadelphia INC — $3,000 · Food & NutritionTHE SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT INC — $4,500 · Human ServicesWOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $1,000 · Human Services
Other$79,881Youth Development$53,000Health$43,286Recreation & Sports$23,600Philanthropy$23,500Food & Nutrition$10,500Human Services$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAPITAL FOR KIDS — $50,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF PHILADELPHIA DELAWARE AND SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSANDY ROLLMAN OVARIAN CANCER FOUNDATION — $18,500 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetKINGS COUNTY TENNIS LEAGUE — $18,500 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetUnite for HER — $17,679 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSHARE FOOD PROGRAM — $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT INC — $4,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC — $4,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKids Against Hunger Philadelphia INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGIRLS INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $2,507 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY GATEWAY INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLISAS ARMY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLSTART — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREASTCANCERORG — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cigna Group FoundationPA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cigna Group Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Wawa Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Citizens Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization R L and Mita Dharia Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to R L and Mita Dharia Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to R L and Mita Dharia Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph