Skip to content
Queen of the Valley Medical Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Queen of the Valley Medical Center

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

$1.1M
Granted FY2018
6
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$632k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Health$1.7MReligion$110kHuman Services$82kHousing & Shelter$40kYouth Development$10k
02FY2018 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $998,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,073,974 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $75,374 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $300k
  • $250k+1 grant · $632k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Joseph Health System Foundation$631,600
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$200,000
EXODUS FOUNDATION$100,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$30,000
VIA HEART PROJECT$20,000
MENTIS$17,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $589k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $200k → 9%On the Move: $27k → 9%Catholic Charities: $152k → 9%Napa Emergency Womens SVCS: $13k → 9%Mentis: $131k → 9%COLLABRIA CARE: $40k → 9%MENTIS: $17k → 9%Aldea: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 5 repeat orgs$357k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +57% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$1.5M
$257k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+57%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $352k · revenue +67%
  • M
    MENTIS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $148k · revenue +206%
  • VH
    VIA HEART PROJECT
    2× · 2017–2018 · $55k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • CC
    COLLABRIA CAREgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +40%
  • OH
    OLE HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $36k · revenue +178%
  • AA
    AREA AGENCY ON AGING SERVING NAPA SOLANO
    one grant, 2017 · $32k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bonita House Inc

To empower people living with mental health and co-occurring substance use challenges to achieve recovery, self-sufficiency, and deeply connected, meaningful lives within their communities.we do this by: delivering culturally responsive…

—
2
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
3
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
4
Court Appointed Special Advocates

The Sonoma County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) Program serves abused and neglected children coming before the Juvenile Court of Protection and Rehabilitation Services.

Civil Rights
5
Progress Foundation

Progress foundation promotes rehabilitation and encourages the highest possible level of self-sufficiency for individuals who are living with and learning to manage a mental illness.

Health
6
Northern Nevada Hiv Outpatient Program Education and Services

Northern Nevada Hopes provides affordable, high-quality, medical, behavioral health, and support services for all. We are dedicated to building a healthier community by providing coordinated care and support for individuals and family…

Health
7
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
9
Northern Valley Harm Reduction Coalition

Northern Valley Harm Reduction Coalition is a 501c3 Non-Profit and Physician Lead Harm Reduction Program. Our program provides life saving Naloxone, Overdose Reversal Training, Safe Use Supplies, Syringe Disposal, HIV/HCV Testing, Drug…

Education
10
Napa Solano Sanesart

Form 990, part i, line 1, description of organization mission: to provide medical and forensic exams that are delivered by sexual assult nurse examiners (sanes) to children & adults; and to serve as an active member of a sexual assault…

Human Services
11
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
12
Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc

Planned Parenthood Northern California generates healthier communities through the delivery of quality sexual and reproductive health care services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aldea Inc; the most unlike its peers is Exodus Foundation for Recovery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $951,200 · HealthST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATIONVIA HEART PROJECT: $55,032 · Health+5 more: $95,000 · Health+5 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $352,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE O…MENTIS: $147,993 · Human ServicesMENTISCOLLABRIA CARE: $39,700 · Human ServicesCOLLABRIA CAREON THE MOVE: $27,000 · Human Services+2 more: $22,500 · Human ServicesEXODUS FOUNDATION FOR RECOVERY: $100,000 · OtherEXODUS FO…AREA AGENCY ON AGING SERVING NAPA SOLANO: $32,400 · OtherAREA AGEN…PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA: $10,000 · OtherPRESBYTER…ROTARY CLUB OF NAPA: $10,000 · OtherROTARY CL…Solano-Napa Habitat for Humanity Inc: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterGIRLS ON THE RUN NAPA & SOLANO INC DBA GIRLS ON THE RUN NORTH BAY: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCope Family Center: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Health$1,101,232Human Services$589,193Other$152,400Housing & Shelter$40,000Youth Development$10,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $951,200 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $352,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMENTIS: $147,993 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetEXODUS FOUNDATION FOR RECOVERY: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetVIA HEART PROJECT: $55,032 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSolano-Napa Habitat for Humanity Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCOLLABRIA CARE: $39,700 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOLE HEALTH: $36,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmbulatory Surgery Access Coalition: $30,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetON THE MOVE: $27,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $11,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN NAPA & SOLANO INC DBA GIRLS ON THE RUN NORTH BAY: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF NAPA: $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetALDEA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCope Family Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…McNabb FoundationSt Joseph Health Nort…Napa Valley Vintners …Community Foundation …The California Wellne…Peter a & Vernice H G…Cope Family CenterMarin Community Found…The Vollmer Family Fo…Winiarski Family Foun…Syar Foundation Susan…
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA32.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · McNabb Foundation · St Joseph Health Northern California LLC · Napa Valley Vintners Healthy Community Fund · Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · The California Wellness Foundation · Peter a & Vernice H Gasser Foundation · Cope Family Center · Marin Community Foundation · The Vollmer Family Foundation · Winiarski Family Foundation · Syar Foundation Susan L Syar Director

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Queen of the Valley Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Queen of the Valley Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2019) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Queen of the Valley Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home