How much did QUAIL ROOST FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of QUAIL ROOST FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

creativity peacegenvalleyhandhorseprotectionburma

2019

empowermentrefugeegenhandhorseprotectiontogether

2020

heartjusticerestorativewomenfood bankflatheadmedical

2021

covid reliefburmataos

2022

ukrainehandimmigrantburmataosreliefguatemala

2023

earthquake reliefstudiestaosguatemalayouth

2024

hurricane reliefjamestaosguatemalahorses heroesheroes marionscholarship

2025

jamesfood bankclinicafood pantryyouth

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k35 grants · $153k
$10k–50k5 grants · $73k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$4.5M

Total assets

Largest grants

HUERFANO COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES DBA SANGRE DE CRISTO CENTER FOR YOUTH$22,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INCORPORATED$20,000
SHUARHANDS INC$10,500
LETTERS CHARITY$10,000
EVERYLIBRARY INSTITUTE NFP$10,000
DORCAS CIRCLE$7,500
EL PUEBLITO UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$7,500
LA CLINICA INC$7,000
NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER$7,000
NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC$7,000
KATERI TEKAKWITHA MISSION FUND$6,000
THE DANIELS HAMANT FOUNDATION$6,000
WINDHORSE SANCTUARY$6,000
GARDNER VALLEY SCHOOL$6,000
BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION$6,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of QUAIL ROOST FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

QUAIL ROOST FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 8.8% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.6M · 90 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

90 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 60 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.6M

$261k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%

+102%

Still filing today

64%

49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesInternationalEnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WS
WINDHORSE SANCTUARY
8× · 2018–2025 · $60k · revenue +16%
BH
BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION
9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +61%
SB
SUSTAINABLE BEREA INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +11%

Funded once

FO
FRIENDS OF CASA MATERNA
one grant, 2017 · $25k
BEREA COLLEGE
one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue -6%
LV
LAS VEGAS NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +924%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Taproot Earth

Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.

Environment

Upaya Social Ventures

Upaya Social Ventures fights extreme poverty through dignified jobs. Founded in 2011, Upaya provides investment and consulting support to early-stage businesses aimed at creating jobs for people living in extreme poverty.

International

One Equal Heart Foundation

One Equal Heart collaborates with indigenous leaders in Mexico to honor and nurture sustainable agriculture, equitable communities and traditional knowledge.

Philanthropy

Nature for Justice

Mobilize funds and provide the necessary technical resources to leading, in-country organizations working with local, indigenous communities to achieve climate resiliency.

Environment

Mountaintop International

Mountaintop International is a nonprofit that is working to build the internal capacity, or "human infrastructure," of low income communities worldwide to solve their own problems. Mountaintop does this through leadership initiatives that…

International

Second Harvest Inland Northwest

Providing food to needy families in the community.

Food & Nutrition

Regenerative Earth

Preserving biological diversity and indigenous wisdom in keystone ecosystems globally, as well as enabling conditions where humans and the environment thrive within.

Environment

Boulder Watershed Collective

The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…

Environment

Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition

Earthlinks Inc

To cultivate transformation and self-worth with people experiencing homelessness and poverty by creating opportunities through earth-centered programs to restore both people and the planet.

Community Improvement

Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment

Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Same Road. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.9%1/108

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,457

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

101 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

99/101

Grantees still filing

87/101

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,060,500Human Services$191,500International$159,500Philanthropy$141,000Education$136,750Animals$122,000Environment$106,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

The Taos Community Foundation IncNM32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Taos Community Foundation Inc · Bainbridge Community Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · One Call for All · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Veterane Family Foundation · Robert T Keeler Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation QUAIL ROOST FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

8get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FLORIDA THOROUGHBRED CHARITIES INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 592991947 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FLORIDA THOROUGHBRED CHARITIES INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 97% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Quail Roost Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Quail Roost Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

QUAIL ROOST FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

101 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Quail Roost Foundation?

More from the funding graph

QUAIL ROOST FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

101 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Quail Roost Foundation?

More from the funding graph