· Private foundation
Quail Roost Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k35 grants · $153k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HUERFANO COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES DBA SANGRE DE CRISTO CENTER FOR YOUTH | $22,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INCORPORATED | $20,000 |
| SHUARHANDS INC | $10,500 |
| EVERYLIBRARY INSTITUTE NFP | $10,000 |
| LETTERS CHARITY | $10,000 |
| EL PUEBLITO UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $7,500 |
| DORCAS CIRCLE | $7,500 |
| LA CLINICA INC | $7,000 |
| NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER | $7,000 |
| NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC | $7,000 |
| THE DANIELS HAMANT FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| KATERI TEKAKWITHA MISSION FUND | $6,000 |
| GARDNER VALLEY SCHOOL | $6,000 |
| BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION | $6,000 |
| WINDHORSE SANCTUARY | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $167k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Quail Roost Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.
91 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 60 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WSWINDHORSE SANCTUARY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +16%
- HNHORSES N HEROES OF MARION COUNTY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $49k · revenue +52%
- BHBURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF CASA MATERNAone grant, 2017 · $25k
BEREA COLLEGEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +50%- LVLAS VEGAS NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.
Working together to create a just and sustainable world through transformative farmer training that nourishes communities and the Earth.
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.
Every Shelter's mission is to build a localized refugee-aid ecosystem centered around the needs, preferences, and aspirations of refugees.
Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.
Earthenable works to solve the housing crisis in africa by revolutionizing the rural housing industry through innovative, affordable, and sustainable home-building solutions. its mission is to create healthier, safer, and climate-resilient…
To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.
The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…
World hunger relief institute equips people to alleviate hunger through education, research, and sustainable agriculture.
Because of our love for God, we extend his mercy as we strive to empower and improve the lives of unsheltered adults in Pueblo, CO, through provisions of food, shelter and navigational support services.
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Taos Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Same Road. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
115 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 115 of the 159 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FLORIDA THOROUGHBRED CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds WINDHORSE SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds HORSES N HEROES OF MARION COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE BEREA INC ↗
- Who funds Daniels Hamant Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds KATERI TEKAKWITHA MISSION FUND ↗
- Who funds Huerfano County Youth Services (aka Sangre De Cristo Center for Youth) ↗
- Who funds Housing Resources Bainbridge ↗
- Who funds CAMBODIA CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds TOMORROW'S WOMEN ↗
- Who funds TALPA COMMUNITY CENTER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds T'RUAH ↗
- Who funds SCHOOLS FOR SALONE ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds Youth Heartline ↗
- Who funds Bridges Project for Education ↗
- Who funds TAOS HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA ↗
- Who funds One World-One Heart Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Everylibrary Institute Nfp ↗
- Who funds SALAAM CULTURAL MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds CONCRETE COUCH ↗
- Who funds HORSE FARMS FOREVER INC ↗
- Who funds FLATHEAD LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE SAMBURU PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: The Taos Community Foundation Inc · Bainbridge Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Lor Foundation Inc · One Call for All · Anschutz Family Foundation · Reed Family Foundation Inc · The Colorado Health Foundation · Robert T Keeler Foundation · Rotary Club of Bainbridge Island Trust · Gates Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Quail Roost Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- World Neighbors Inc — 46% of income from government
- Food and Shelter Inc — 6% of income from government
- Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Horse Farms Forever Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Quail Roost Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Quail Roost Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.