Skip to content
Quail Roost Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Quail Roost Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$391kEducation$297kHuman Services$169kAnimals$148kPhilanthropy$144kHealth$137kEnvironment$123kHousing & Shelter$88kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k35 grants · $153k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUERFANO COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES DBA SANGRE DE CRISTO CENTER FOR YOUTH$22,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INCORPORATED$20,000
SHUARHANDS INC$10,500
LETTERS CHARITY$10,000
EVERYLIBRARY INSTITUTE NFP$10,000
DORCAS CIRCLE$7,500
EL PUEBLITO UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$7,500
NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC$7,000
NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER$7,000
LA CLINICA INC$7,000
KATERI TEKAKWITHA MISSION FUND$6,000
THE DANIELS HAMANT FOUNDATION$6,000
BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION$6,000
WINDHORSE SANCTUARY$6,000
GARDNER VALLEY SCHOOL$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $167k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%A CUP OF COLD WATER: $5k → 9%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $500 → 10%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $7k → 8%A PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $2k → 5%KITSAP IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER: $4k → 10%LETTERS CHARITY: $10k → 14%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $6k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES OF BROOMFIELD I: $1k → 5%NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE: $1k → 10%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $4k → 8%A PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $1k → 5%KITSAP IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER: $1k → 10%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $6k → 8%ONE NATION WALKING TOGETHER: $2k → 9%CENTER FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTIC: $1k → 11%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $5k → 8%PEACOCK FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 10%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $5k → 8%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $5k → 8%RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 9%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $5k → 8%DORCAS CIRCLE: $8k → 19%RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 9%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $4k → 8%DORCAS CIRCLE: $2k → 19%THE PLACE: $2k → 9%STIRRUPS 'N STRIDES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $4k → 16%STIRRUPS N STRIDES THERAPEUTIC RIDI: $3k → 16%PEACOCK FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 10%STIRRUPS 'N STRIDES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $2k → 16%HELPLINE HOUSE: $1k → 10%NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC: $10k → 18%NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC: $7k → 18%NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC: $7k → 18%NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC: $7k → 18%PEACOCK FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 10%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $4k → 18%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $4k → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT INC: $3k → 18%DREAM TREE PROJECT: $3k → 18%DREAM TREE PROJECT: $3k → 18%DREAM TREE PROJECT: $3k → 18%NOT FORGOTTEN OUTREACH INC: $2k → 18%NOT FORGOTTEN OUTREACH INC: $2k → 18%DREAM TREE PROJECT: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
NM
NC
DC
HI
OK
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Quail Roost Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Quail Roost Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 10% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 91 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

91 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 60 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

91
56

Total granted

$1.7M
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+46%

Still filing today

76%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationAnimalsEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WINDHORSE SANCTUARY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +16%
  • HN
    HORSES N HEROES OF MARION COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $49k · revenue +52%
  • BH
    BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CASA MATERNA
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • BEREA COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +50%
  • LV
    LAS VEGAS NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUN
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Taproot Earth

Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.

Environment
3
Sustainable Harvest International

Working together to create a just and sustainable world through transformative farmer training that nourishes communities and the Earth.

Environment
4
Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
5
Every Shelter Inc

Every Shelter's mission is to build a localized refugee-aid ecosystem centered around the needs, preferences, and aspirations of refugees.

Education
6
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

—
7
Earthenable Inc

Earthenable works to solve the housing crisis in africa by revolutionizing the rural housing industry through innovative, affordable, and sustainable home-building solutions. its mission is to create healthier, safer, and climate-resilient…

International
8
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
Boulder Watershed Collective

The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…

Environment
10
World Hunger Relief Institute

World hunger relief institute equips people to alleviate hunger through education, research, and sustainable agriculture.

International
11
Pueblo Rescue Mission

Because of our love for God, we extend his mercy as we strive to empower and improve the lives of unsheltered adults in Pueblo, CO, through provisions of food, shelter and navigational support services.

—
12
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Taos Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Same Road. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

115 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 115 of the 159 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
48
Early backer (in before they grew)
114/115
Grantees still filing
89/115
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHUARHANDS INC: $68,500 · OtherSHUARHANDS INCUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO-TAOS: $63,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO-TAOSINSTITUTE FOR PEACE STUDIES: $33,000 · OtherNGUYEN NGA CENTER: $32,000 · OtherHORSES N HEROES OF MARION COUNTY INC: $49,000 · OtherHuerfano County Youth Services (aka Sangre De Cristo Center for Youth): $39,000 · OtherHousing Resources Bainbridge: $35,500 · Other+79 more: $624,500 · Other+79 moreKATERI TEKAKWITHA MISSION FUND: $41,000 · InternationalKATERI TEKAKW…CAMBODIA CORPS INC: $33,000 · InternationalCAMBODIA CORP…T'RUAH: $29,000 · InternationalT'RUAHHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $23,000 · InternationalHAND IN HAND …One World-One Heart Foundation Inc: $23,000 · InternationalOne World-One…THE SAMBURU PROJECT INC: $15,000 · InternationalTHE SAMBURU P…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $12,000 · InternationalMercy Corps: $10,500 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $8,000 · International+9 more: $37,000 · International+9 moreBURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $47,000 · Human ServicesBURMA HUMAN…NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC: $31,000 · Human ServicesNONVIOLENCE…NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $25,000 · Human ServicesNEW MEXICO …DREAM TREE PROJECT: $13,500 · Human ServicesDREAM TREE …LETTERS CHARITY: $10,000 · Human ServicesDORCAS CIRCLE: $9,500 · Human ServicesPEACOCK FAMILY SERVICES: $9,000 · Human ServicesSTIRRUPS N STRIDES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $7,500 · Human Services+13 more: $35,500 · Human Services+13 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $41,250 · EducationUNIVERSIT…SCHOOLS FOR SALONE: $26,000 · EducationSCHOOLS F…Bridges Project for Education: $24,000 · EducationBridges P…Everylibrary Institute Nfp: $22,000 · EducationEverylibr…BEREA COLLEGE: $12,500 · EducationBEREA COL…Gardner Valley School: $12,000 · EducationGardner V…BOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Education+3 more: $8,000 · EducationFLORIDA THOROUGHBRED CHARITIES INC: $84,000 · PhilanthropyDaniels Hamant Foundation: $43,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE LTD: $5,000 · Philanthropy+4 more: $9,000 · PhilanthropyWINDHORSE SANCTUARY INC: $69,000 · AnimalsEQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY: $41,000 · AnimalsHORSE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA INC: $10,000 · AnimalsCOLORADO PET PANTRY: $10,000 · AnimalsWHIMPERS TO WAGS RESCUE INC: $6,000 · Animals+3 more: $5,000 · AnimalsSUSTAINABLE BEREA INC: $45,250 · EnvironmentHORSE FARMS FOREVER INC: $16,000 · EnvironmentFLATHEAD LAND TRUST: $15,500 · EnvironmentPUGET SOUND RESTORATION FUND: $14,000 · EnvironmentMOUNTAIN STUDIES INSTITUE: $11,000 · EnvironmentISLANDWOOD: $6,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENT NEXT INC: $5,750 · EnvironmentTREES WATER AND PEOPLE: $4,000 · Environment
Other$945,250International$231,500Human Services$197,000Education$153,750Philanthropy$141,000Animals$141,000Environment$117,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFLORIDA THOROUGHBRED CHARITIES INC: $84,000 over 8y, 97% of budgetWINDHORSE SANCTUARY INC: $69,000 over 9y, 16% of budgetHORSES N HEROES OF MARION COUNTY INC: $49,000 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetBURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $47,000 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetSUSTAINABLE BEREA INC: $45,250 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetDaniels Hamant Foundation: $43,000 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $41,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKATERI TEKAKWITHA MISSION FUND: $41,000 over 9y, 10% of budgetEQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY: $41,000 over 9y, 8.1% of budgetHuerfano County Youth Services (aka Sangre De Cristo Center for Youth): $39,000 over 7y, 31% of budgetHousing Resources Bainbridge: $35,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCAMBODIA CORPS INC: $33,000 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetNONVIOLENCE WORKS INC: $31,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTOMORROW'S WOMEN: $30,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetTALPA COMMUNITY CENTER ASSOCIATION: $29,500 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetT'RUAH: $29,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSCHOOLS FOR SALONE: $26,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetNEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $25,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYouth Heartline: $24,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBridges Project for Education: $24,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetTAOS HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $23,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $23,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOne World-One Heart Foundation Inc: $23,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetEverylibrary Institute Nfp: $22,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSALAAM CULTURAL MUSEUM: $18,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCONCRETE COUCH: $18,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetHORSE FARMS FOREVER INC: $16,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetFLATHEAD LAND TRUST: $15,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE SAMBURU PROJECT INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPUGET SOUND RESTORATION FUND: $14,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDREAM TREE PROJECT: $13,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBLUE SKY FUND: $13,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGardner Valley School: $12,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNTAIN STUDIES INSTITUE: $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMercy Corps: $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHORSE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLAS VEGAS NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLETTERS CHARITY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLOCALOGY: $10,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetCOLORADO PET PANTRY: $10,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetDORCAS CIRCLE: $9,500 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetWe Fortify: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN HILLS CARES: $9,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPEACOCK FAMILY SERVICES: $9,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSTIRRUPS N STRIDES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $9,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FLORIDA THOROUGHBRED CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDHORSE SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds HORSES N HEROES OF MARION COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE BEREA INC ↗
  • Who funds Daniels Hamant Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KATERI TEKAKWITHA MISSION FUND ↗
  • Who funds EQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds Huerfano County Youth Services (aka Sangre De Cristo Center for Youth) ↗
  • Who funds Housing Resources Bainbridge ↗
  • Who funds CAMBODIA CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMORROW'S WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds TALPA COMMUNITY CENTER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds T'RUAH ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOLS FOR SALONE ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Youth Heartline ↗
  • Who funds Bridges Project for Education ↗
  • Who funds TAOS HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA ↗
  • Who funds One World-One Heart Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Everylibrary Institute Nfp ↗
  • Who funds SALAAM CULTURAL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CONCRETE COUCH ↗
  • Who funds HORSE FARMS FOREVER INC ↗
  • Who funds FLATHEAD LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE SAMBURU PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

The Taos Community Fo…Bainbridge Community …El Pomar FoundationSanta Fe Community Fo…Lor Foundation IncOne Call for AllAnschutz Family Found…Reed Family Foundatio…The Colorado Health F…Robert T Keeler Found…Rotary Club of Bainbr…Gates Family Foundati…
The Taos Community Foundation IncNM33.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Taos Community Foundation Inc · Bainbridge Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Lor Foundation Inc · One Call for All · Anschutz Family Foundation · Reed Family Foundation Inc · The Colorado Health Foundation · Robert T Keeler Foundation · Rotary Club of Bainbridge Island Trust · Gates Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Quail Roost Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Quail Roost Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • World Neighbors Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Food and Shelter Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Horse Farms Forever Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Quail Roost Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Quail Roost Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 159 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Quail Roost’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home