Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pueblo Day Nursery Children's Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$94k
Granted FY2026still arriving
13
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$90kHuman Services$64kArts & Culture$59kCrime & Legal$44kHousing & Shelter$27kAnimals$21kEducation$20kFood & Nutrition$19kOther$0
02FY2026 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k8 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $56k
$6,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS & CONFERENCE$12,500
Individual grant recipient$11,500
POSADA$11,500
EAST SIDE CHILD CARE CENTER$10,500
CASA OF PUEBLO$10,400
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PUEBLO$6,500
PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$6,500
PUEBLO CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$6,000
YMCA OF PUEBLO$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SO COLO$5,000
NATURE & WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER$5,000
SANGRE DE CRISTO COMMUNITY CARE$3,000
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF PUEBLO$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SANGRE DE CRISTO COMMUNITY CARE: $3k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO: $5k → 15%EAST SIDE CHILD CARE CENTER: $11k → 15%EAST SIDE CHILD CARE CENTER: $5k → 15%EAST SIDE CHILD CARE CENTER: $4k → 15%EAST SIDE CHILD CARE CENTER: $3k → 15%PUEBLO COOPERATIVE CARE CENTER: $3k → 15%YWCA OF PUEBLO: $3k → 15%PUEBLO COOPERATIVE CARE CENTER: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$394k · 29 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
15

Total granted

$394k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
0%

Still filing today

45%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’26
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P
    POSADA
    7× · 2019–2026 · $38k · revenue +67%
  • CO
    CASA OF PUEBLO INC
    8× · 2018–2026 · $31k · revenue +120%
  • PZ
    PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    7× · 2017–2026 · $27k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • AL
    ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -16%
  • EP
    EXECUTIVE PARTNERING TO CHILDREN
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pueblo Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc

To empower women and families in the greater pueblo colorado area with the educational, emotional and spiritual resources they need to choose life and thrive.

Health
2
Center for Nonprofit Excellence

The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…

—
3
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

—
4
Pueblo Diversified Industries Inc

To create pathways of opportunity where people with diverse abilities thrive through informed choices, meaningful education and employment, premier residential services, and dynamic social experience.

Employment
5
Pueblo Rape Crisis Services Inc

Juniper SoCO provides comprehensive healing resources to survivors of sexual assault / intimate partner violence, equipping the community to prevent future sexual violence, & fostering an organizational culture that prioritizes wellness…

Health
6
El Pueblo Inc

El pueblo mission is to build collective power through leadership development organizing and direct act so that the latin american community and other marginalized communities control our own stories and destinies

Human Services
7
Pueblo Library Foundation

The organization is organized to perform functions of or to carryout the purposes of the Pueblo City-County Library District including providing resources for development maintenance and operation of the Pueblo City-County Library District…

Philanthropy
8
Pueblo Rescue Mission

Because of our love for God, we extend his mercy as we strive to empower and improve the lives of unsheltered adults in Pueblo, CO, through provisions of food, shelter and navigational support services.

—
9
Durango Early Learning Center Inc

Nurturing child development in partnership with families of diverse backgrounds.

—
10
Colorado Casa Inc

Colorado CASA is a nonprofit organization that works to strengthen local CASA organizations and advocate for children in the child welfare system.

Civil Rights
11
Pueblo Economic Development Corporation

Our mission is to attract, retain, and expand primary jobs for the Pueblo community.

—
12
Arapahoe County Early Childhood Council Inc

Services provided in arapahoe county colorado related to early childhood education intervention issues.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Side Child Care Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Early Learning Ventures. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PUEBLO: $26,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PUEBLOSANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS AND CONFERENC: $24,000 · OtherSANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS AND CONFERENCASSISTANCE LEAGUE: $17,250 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUEYMCA OF PUEBLO: $16,500 · OtherYMCA OF PUEBLOIndividual grant recipient: $15,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $14,938 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESSANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS & CONFERENCE: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,500 · OtherPUEBLO FAMILY YMCA: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherEARLY LEARNING VENTURES: $9,500 · Other+25 more: $109,636 · Other+25 moreCASA OF PUEBLO INC: $31,133 · Crime & LegalCASA OF PUEBL…ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER: $15,100 · Crime & LegalROCKY MOUNTAI…PUEBLO CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $10,140 · Crime & LegalPUEBLO CHILD …POSADA: $38,010 · Housing & ShelterPOSADAEAST SIDE CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $22,480 · Human ServicesEAST SIDE…Pueblo Cooperative Care Center: $5,000 · Human ServicesPueblo Co…ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANC…SANGRE DE CRISTO HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $3,000 · Human ServicesSANGRE DE…Mariposa Center for Safety: $2,500 · Human ServicesMariposa …PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $26,569 · AnimalsCare and Share Inc: $18,500 · Food & NutritionPUEBLO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $16,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $450 · Arts & Culture
Other$278,074Crime & Legal$56,373Housing & Shelter$38,010Human Services$37,980Animals$26,569Food & Nutrition$18,500Arts & Culture$16,950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPOSADA: $38,010 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCASA OF PUEBLO INC: $31,133 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetPUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $26,569 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetEAST SIDE CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $22,480 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCare and Share Inc: $18,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPUEBLO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $16,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER: $15,100 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPUEBLO CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $10,140 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEARLY LEARNING VENTURES: $9,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER: $9,250 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF PUEBLO: $8,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetPueblo Cooperative Care Center: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN COLORADO HERITAGE CENTER: $3,777 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetSOARING EAGLES CENTER FOR AUTISM: $3,745 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetExecutives Partnering to Invest in Children (EPIC): $2,070 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHARP FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNATURE AND RAPTOR CENTER OF PUEBLO: $895 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBessemer Historical Society Inc: $450 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds POSADA ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF PUEBLO INC ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds EAST SIDE CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Care and Share Inc ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EARLY LEARNING VENTURES ↗
  • Who funds NATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF PUEBLO ↗
  • Who funds Pueblo Cooperative Care Center ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN COLORADO HERITAGE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOARING EAGLES CENTER FOR AUTISM ↗
  • Who funds SANGRE DE CRISTO HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE ↗
  • Who funds Mariposa Center for Safety ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO39.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Southern Colorado Community Foundat · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund · El Pomar Foundation · Robert Hoag Rawlings Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · United Way of Pueblo County Colorado Inc · The Colorado Health Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Ryals Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pueblo Day Nursery Children's Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pueblo Day Nursery Children's Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pueblo Day Nursery Children's’ filings →

    More from the funding graph