Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pucci Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$275k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Animals$1.7MArts & Culture$258kPublic Benefit$200kCrime & Legal$175kHealth$127kEducation$111kReligion$50kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hooved Animal Rescue & Protection Society (HARPS)$100,000
Fox River Valley Hunt Association$100,000
Chicago Zoological Society - Brookfield Zoo$50,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Little City Foundation: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
CA
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 7 repeat orgs$730k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
33

Total granted

$1.9M
$730k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+27%

Still filing today

86%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HOOVED ANIMAL RESCUE & PROTECTION SOCIETY
    5× · 2019–2025 · $700k · revenue +1% · 52% of their budget
  • FR
    FOX RIVER VALLEY HUNT ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $600k · revenue +10% · 31% of their budget
  • Chicago Zoological Society
    5× · 2018–2025 · $370k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • CC
    Chicago Commission
    one grant, 2018 · $200k
  • CC
    CHICAGO CRIME COMMISSION
    one grant, 2020 · $175k · revenue -99% · 89% of their budget
  • CM
    CHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUM
    one grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue -13% · 46% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
2
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
The American Kennel Club Museum of the Dog

The akc museum of the dog preserves, interprets and celebrates the role of dogs in society and educates the public about the human-canine bond through its collection of art and exhibits that inspire engagement with dogs.

Arts & Culture
7
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
8
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

10
American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine

The mission of the american college of veterinary internal medicine (acvim) is to enhance animal and human health by advancing veterinary internal medicine through training, education, an discovery. the acvim is the american certifying…

11
American Astronomical Society

The american astronomical society (aas), established in 1899, is the major organization of professional astronomers in north america. the basic objective of the aas is to promote the advancement of astronomy and closely related branches of…

Science & Tech
12
Racine Zoological Society Inc

The mission of the racine zoological society is to foster an enlightening and affordable wildlife experience that improves the bond between people and nature. the society will provide for the recreation and education of the people, the…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Field Museum of Natural History and the most unlike its peers is Fox River Valley Hound Heritage Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionCancer Support OrganizationsUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Pregnancy Support ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Developmental Disabilities …Community Health CentersIndependent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 70 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr15%20%20–35yr14%12%35–55yr22%64%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr15%46%20–35yr14%11%35–55yr22%42%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,332

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FOX RIVER VALLEY HUNT ASSOCIATION — $600,000 · OtherFOX RIVER VALLEY HUNT ASSOCIATIONChicago Commission — $200,000 · OtherChicago CommissionCHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUM — $150,000 · OtherCHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUMHARPS — $100,000 · OtherHARPSCatholic Charities Archdiocese of Chicago — $50,000 · Other+14 more — $15,200 · OtherHOOVED ANIMAL RESCUE & PROTECTION SOCIETY — $700,000 · AnimalsHOOVED ANIMAL RESCUE & PROTECTION SOCIETYChicago Zoological Society — $370,000 · AnimalsChicago Zoological Society+4 more — $400 · AnimalsCHICAGO CRIME COMMISSION — $175,000 · Crime & LegalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $125,000 · Health+5 more — $1,100 · HealthCARTHAGE COLLEGE — $85,910 · EducationMARINE MILITARY ACADEMY INC — $25,000 · Education+1 more — $200 · EducationFOX RIVER VALLEY PONY CLUB — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL MUSEUM OF MEXICAN ART FKA MEXICAN FINE ARTS CENTER MUSEUM — $5,000 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $2,000 · Arts & CultureKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry — $1,000 · Arts & CultureFox River Valley Hound Heritage Foundation — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,115,200Animals$1,070,400Crime & Legal$175,000Health$126,100Education$111,110Recreation & Sports$10,000Arts & Culture$9,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOOVED ANIMAL RESCUE & PROTECTION SOCIETY — $700,000 over 5y, 52% of budgetFOX RIVER VALLEY HUNT ASSOCIATION — $600,000 over 7y, 31% of budgetChicago Zoological Society — $370,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO CRIME COMMISSION — $175,000 over 1y, 89% of budgetCHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUM — $150,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCARTHAGE COLLEGE — $85,910 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE MILITARY ACADEMY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOX RIVER VALLEY PONY CLUB — $10,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetEQUINE LAND CONSERVATION RESOURCE — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF MEXICAN ART FKA MEXICAN FINE ARTS CENTER MUSEUM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFox River Valley Hound Heritage Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLENWOOD ACADEMY — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE CITY FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlley Cat Allies Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hamill Family FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hamill Family Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pucci Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pucci Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Pucci Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph