Skip to content

Wisconsin · Nonprofit

MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC

MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC (Wisconsin) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,448,215 to it, the largest being RSF SOCIAL FINANCE INC ($422,394). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$2.5M
Funders on record
14
Grants received
$1.4M
Net assets
$3.0M
11/14 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc does

Mission

Michael fields agricultural institute's mission is to help rural and urban farms and agricultural communities in wisconsin and beyond be healthy environmentally, economically, and socially.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Education - michael fields agricultural institute's education program focuses on outreach for federal programs, and providing learning opportunities through workshops, events and webinars where learning happens with professionals or in a peer-to-peer setting/model. The education programs at mfai include wisconsin women in conservation (wiwic), midwest grain resources & immersion training (midwest grit), milwaukee urban ag network (muan), share, and 2501. These programs are actively creating events in the educational space and engaging stakeholders in all of this programming. Our outreach efforts are strengthened by partnerships with other non profits in the ag space, community organizations and our collaborative efforts with the universities across the region.the education department mainly focuses on outreach for federal programs, and providing learning opportunities through workshops, events and webinars where learning happens with professionals or in a peer-to-peer setting/model. The education programs at mfai include wisconsin women in conservation (wiwic), midwest grain resources & immersion training (midwest grit), milwaukee urban ag network (muan), share, and 2501. These…

    $1,419,656 spentof which $699,793 as grants$6,253 earned by the program
    69% of program spending
  2. Research - michael fields agricultural institute's research program focuses on advancing agricultural research and management practices for alternative crops; I.e., anything but corn and soybeans. Advancing knowledge and practice of other crops can contribute to the extension of crop rotations in the upper midwest region, meeting the goals of diversifying the agricultural landscape, increasing productivity and soil health on working lands, fostering increased wildlife, insect, and microbial biodiversity on our working lands, and increasing the potential for ecosystem services provision to midwestern communities, such as enhanced water quality and soil conservation. Both grant-funded and farm enterprise activities that serve as innovation platforms and outreach/demonstration sites for midwestern farmers and community members, make up the program.michael fields agricultural institute's research program consists of two full-time agricultural scientists and one full-time technician, and operates with a mission of advancing agricultural research and management practices for alternative crops, I.e., anything but corn and soybeans. Advancing knowledge and practice of other crops can…

    $384,617 spentof which $8,969 as grants$13,441 earned by the program
    19% of program spending
  3. Public policy - michael fields agricultural institute's policy program work turns farmer experience and research evidence into systems change. Our approach is grounded in collaborationwith farmers, grassroots groups, and partner organizationsto ensure that policies reflect the realities of those working the land. We organize coalitions across regenerative subgroups already engaged through our education network, from women farmers and urban growers to small grains producers. By linking these communities directly to the policy process, we elevate grassroots priorities into statewide and national conversations. The team also confronts the influence of money in politics by advancing political education, strengthening democratic practice, and promoting transparency. Working closely with mfai's research and communications teams, policy efforts use data to back farmer stories, evaluate federal programs, and craft evidence-based recommendations. Through campaigns and storytelling, we build public understanding and support for regenerative agricultureturning local insight into collective power.among mfai's public policy activities, we educated farmers and others about the farm bill policy…

    $240,759 spentof which $24,436 as grants$41,597 earned by the program
    12% of program spending
  4. Food and farming systems - the integrated farming systems program is a model farm business enterprise that produces and markets perennial grains. Through this model business, mfai aggregates, cleans, and markets grain while generating real-world data on production costs, logistics, and buyer requirements. These operations inform our broader research, education and policy work by identifying barriers to entrysuch as infrastructure gaps, financing limitations, and policy misalignmentand by demonstrating practical pathways for perennial grain adoption. The program advances mfai's mission to build resilient, regenerative, and economically viable farming systems while supporting farmer income diversification and regional climate goals.the institute's farming systems activities included virtual workshops, cover crop & small grains field days. Farm and research field days took place as part of the institute's research and policy program work. Technological tools and solutions to enable production of healthy food with the least amount of chemicals and environmental impacts, while maximizing the quality of food products and rural livelihoods is key information mfai incorporates in…

    $22,344 spent$18,672 earned by the program
    1% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,067,376.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($851k) Expenses 100 ($1.0M) Net assets 100 ($4.8M)2018 Revenue 119 ($1.0M) Expenses 99 ($1.0M) Net assets 100 ($4.8M)2019 Revenue 23 ($199k) Expenses 99 ($1.0M) Net assets 83 ($4.0M)2020 Revenue 91 ($772k) Expenses 94 ($963k) Net assets 79 ($3.8M)2021 Revenue 123 ($1.0M) Expenses 126 ($1.3M) Net assets 74 ($3.6M)2022 Revenue 85 ($723k) Expenses 148 ($1.5M) Net assets 59 ($2.9M)2023 Revenue 237 ($2.0M) Expenses 205 ($2.1M) Net assets 60 ($2.9M)2024 Revenue 298 ($2.5M) Expenses 240 ($2.5M) Net assets 62 ($3.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (298)Expenses (240)Net assets (62)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $5.2M to $4.3M (−16%).

$5.2M
$5.2M
$4.3M
$4.2M
$3.7M
$3.1M
$3.3M
$3.5M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 31% · 2018 35% · 2019 153% · 2020 63% · 2021 66% · 2022 133% · 2023 82% · 2024 75%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

93% of MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (94% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,195 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 7 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$174k
’17
−$159
’18
−$814k
’19
−$191k
’20
−$246k
’21
−$798k
’22
−$87k
’23
$73k
’24
0.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Ryan Martin

Executive director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed108101181188
Joined·+1+5+1+1+3+2+2
No longer listed·3304052
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 5 funders, grant income fell $176k → $124k.

4 of 14 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 43% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 29% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

64% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC.

29%
largest funder
61%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 97% · 2018 100% · 2019 45% · 2020 95% · 2021 43% · 2022 30% · 2023 81% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 79% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Wisconsin, across 6 states in all.

MN
IL
NY
MA
CA
CO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Wisconsin out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $619k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC has grown faster than half of the 1,130 food & nutrition nonprofits its size.

Operating margin3% · below the median
Months of reserve0.9mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)17% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,130 food & nutrition nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $7.4M on record.

Federal$7.4M
grants $7.4Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$7.4M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Wisconsin

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

84% of spending goes to programs.

Program 84%Management 15%Fundraising 1%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WI

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Fields Best Inc · corp_trust

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC?
MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC (Wisconsin) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,448,215 to it, the largest being RSF SOCIAL FINANCE INC ($422,394). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC have?
IRS filings report 14 organizations giving $1,448,215 in grants to MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC?
RSF SOCIAL FINANCE INC is the largest funder on record, with $422,394 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MICHAEL FIELDS AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Wisconsin. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 14 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing