· Private foundation
Psalm 103 Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $293k
- $50k–250k19 grants · $2.0M
- $250k+9 grants · $6.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EASTERN UNIVERISTY | $2,750,000 |
| VANGUARD CHARITABLE | $1,000,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC | $550,000 |
| THE CITY SCHOOL | $350,000 |
| FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $350,000 |
| EASTERN UNIVERISTY | $350,000 |
| PHILLY HOUSE (FKA SUNDAY BREAKFAST ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA) | $250,000 |
| PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES | $250,000 |
| UPENN | $250,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA SKATING CLUB AND HUMANE SOCIETY | $241,761 |
| WORLD VISION | $200,000 |
| WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES | $166,667 |
| ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL | $148,000 |
| AMERICAN TRAUMA SOCIETY PA DIV | $125,000 |
| ARTWELL COLLABORATIVE INC | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
36 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EUEASTERN UNIVERSITY4× · 2020–2024 · $4.4M · revenue +83%
- PFPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES4× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +59%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PHILADELPHIA INC4× · 2020–2024 · $800k · revenue +123%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAYone grant, 2021 · $1.0M
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue +30%
- CCChristian Camps Inc dba Deerfoot Lodge & Subsidiarygraduatedone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +52%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.
Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.
Chi prepares graduates of the christel house schools operated by its affiliated entities, which chi funds and oversees, to achieve upward economic mobility, demonstrate good citizenship, and become empowered to identify and realize their…
Mid-atlantic christian university is an undergraduate institution of christian higher learning whose mission is to impact the world by transforming ordinary people into extraordinary christian leaders. students are taught to think…
TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The association of catholic colleges and universities, founded in 1899, serves as the collective voice of u.s catholic higher education. through programs and services, the association strengthens and promptes the catholic identity and…
The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ethics and Public Policy Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Franklin County Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DELAWARE COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CRADLE OF LIBERTY COUNCIL 525 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds African Mission Healthcare Foundation ↗
- Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds Artwell Collaborative Inc ↗
- Who funds ACSI Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds The City School ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA SKATING CLUB & HUMANE SOCIE TY ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUTH ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds Christian Camps Inc dba Deerfoot Lodge & Subsidiary ↗
- Who funds SUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty ↗
- Who funds ENCORE SERIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR DRUG POLICY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Edify ↗
- Who funds LAUSANNE COMMITTEE FOR WORLD EVANGELIZATION ↗
- Who funds CAIRN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INT'L ↗
- Who funds SERVINGLEADERS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOMS FOUNDATION AT VALLEY FORGE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · The Philadelphia Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The William Penn Foundation · Sanders Caroline J S Td No 2 · Doll Family Foundation · John Templeton Foundation · Tyndale House Ministries · Connelly Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Psalm 103 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Psalm 103 Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Psalm 103 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.