Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Progressive Multiplier Fund

Supporting charitable organizations to do community outreach & revenue generation.

$920k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.

Civil Rights$1.3MPublic Benefit$748kCommunity Improvement$538kEnvironment$535kHuman Services$286kCrime & Legal$266kHealth$175kArts & Culture$142kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k28 grants · $718k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $203k
$25,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAITH IN FLORIDA INC$52,500
VOICE OF THE EXPERIENCED (VOTE)$50,000
ENGAGE MIAMI CIVIC FUND$50,000
FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC$50,000
CROSSROADS CULTURAL ARTS CENTER$40,000
COMMON DEFENSE EDUCATION FUND INC$35,000
THE MOSAIC INSTITUTE$35,000
FORMERLY INCARCERATED CONVICTED PEOPLE AND FAMILIES MOVEMENT INC$35,000
REAL WOMEN RADIO FOUNDATION$35,000
PROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC$35,000
RESTOREHER USAMERICA INC$35,000
NEW DISABLED SOUTH$35,000
HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER INC$35,000
CENTER FOR INTERCULTURAL ORGANIZING DBA UNITE OREGON$26,750
IF WHEN HOW$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $426k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%For the Many (Tides Center): $50k → 9%HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $35k → 13%Harriet Tubman Freedom Fighters: $15k → 14%Detroit Action Education Fund: $35k → 21%The Ordinary People Society: $45k → 17%AYNI INSTITUTE INC: $5k → 14%HUDSON VALLEY LGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER (NOBODY LEAVES MID-HOUSTON): $25k → 9%Ideas for Us: $25k → 13%Harriet Tubman Freedom Fighters: $10k → 14%Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Atlanta: $25k → 9%Young Women's Freedom Center: $10k → 10%Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta: $25k → 9%Jane Addams Senior Caucus: $10k → 14%PARENTSTOGETHER FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%Poder LatinX (Tides Center): $50k → 14%Poder LatinX: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
KY
VA
MD
NM
TN
NC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 27 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
70

Total granted

$1.7M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+16%

Still filing today

100%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $409k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsEnvironmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ALABAMA FORWARD
    2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +16%
  • AH
    A HEALTHIER DEMOCRACY INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue +40%
  • AV
    After Violence Project
    2× · 2019–2022 · $95k · revenue +999%

Funded once

  • P
    PUSHBLACKgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $120k · revenue +221%
  • TT
    THE TRANSGENDER DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • IN OUR OWN VOICE NATIONAL BLACK WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE AGENDAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
Powerswitch Action

Powerswitch action is a national network forging collective democracy and economies in our cities and states, together with our 21 grassroots affiliates.

Community Improvement
4
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
5
Colorofchangeorg

Colorofchange.org works to strengthen the voice of black americans and increase the level of accountability and responsiveness of elected officials to underrepresented black constituencies using the internet as a lobbying and…

—
6
Wepower

We activate community power to redesign social systems to be just and equitable for all through (1) developing and supporting leaders and organizations and (2) leading campaigns, coalitions, and innovative initiatives.

Community Improvement
7
Bold Impact

Bold Impact is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting a democracy where all communities get to thrive.

Arts & Culture
8
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
9
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
10
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
11
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
12
Right to Democracy Project

Advance democracy, equity, and self-determination in U.S. territories through participatory advocacy, narrative and cultural change, and ecosystem building.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum and the most unlike its peers is Washington Interfaith Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsImmigrant Worker SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyHealth Access Advocacy and …Pregnancy Support ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Affordable Housing Developm…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Development ServicesSenior Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Women & Girls Leadership De…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%23%5–10yr19%32%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%7%<5yr14%26%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%3/113
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,452

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
104/105
Grantees still filing
58/105
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PUSHBLACK — $120,000 · Civil RightsPUSHBLACKALABAMA FORWARD — $100,000 · Civil RightsALABAMA FORWARDFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC — $100,000 · Civil RightsFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INCA HEALTHIER DEMOCRACY INC — $100,000 · Civil RightsA HEALTHIER DEMOCRACY INCAfter Violence Project — $95,000 · Civil RightsAfter Violence ProjectIFWHENHOW — $75,000 · Civil RightsUltraViolet Education Fund — $75,000 · Civil RightsTHE TRANSGENDER DISTRICT — $75,000 · Civil RightsURGE UNITE FOR REPRODUCTIVE & GENDER EQUITY — $75,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM — $62,500 · Civil RightsIMAGINE BLACK — $61,875 · Civil RightsRewire News Group — $60,000 · Civil Rights+20 more — $661,415 · Civil Rights+20 moreENGAGE MIAMI INC — $95,000 · OtherENGAGE MIAMI INCADVOCATES FOR YOUTH — $50,000 · OtherCASA INC — $50,000 · OtherCitizen SHE — $45,000 · OtherACCION POLITICA PCUNISTA DBA PCUN — $66,400 · OtherACCION POLITICA PCUNISTA DBA P…CROSSROADS CULTURAL ARTS CENTER — $50,000 · Other+32 more — $827,641 · Other+32 moreTIDES CENTER — $220,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesASIAN AMERIC…THE ORDINARY PEOPLE SOCIETY TOPS — $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE ORDINARY…HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesHOPE COMMUNI…Harriet Tubman Freedom Fighters Corp — $25,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WOMEN OF COLOR — $25,000 · Human ServicesIDEAS FOR US INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesHudson Valley LGBTQ Community Center Inc — $25,000 · Human Services+5 more — $46,000 · Human Services+5 moreSTAND — $40,000 · EnvironmentSTANDGREENFAITH INC — $37,233 · EnvironmentGREENFAITH …Asian Pacific Environmental Network — $37,233 · EnvironmentAsian Pacif…CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE — $35,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE JUS…OUR CLIMATE — $35,000 · EnvironmentOUR CLIMATE350 NEW HAMPSHIRE — $35,000 · Environment350 NEW HAM…Climate Mobilization Project Inc — $35,000 · EnvironmentClimate Mob…CLEAN PRODUCTION ACTION INC — $35,000 · EnvironmentCLEAN PRODU…Infact DBA Corporate Accountability — $30,000 · EnvironmentInfact DBA …WATER COLLABORATIVE OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS — $26,178 · EnvironmentWATER COLLA…US CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK — $26,178 · EnvironmentUS CLIMATE …RIVERKEEPER INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentRIVERKEEPER…1 FOR THE PLANET INC — $25,000 · Environment1 FOR THE P…FRIENDS OF THE EARTH — $15,928 · EnvironmentNATIONAL LATINA INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE — $60,000 · HealthMEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE — $60,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE — $60,000 · HealthABORTION CARE NETWORK — $45,000 · HealthNew Disabled South Inc — $35,000 · HealthFAITH IN FLORIDA INC — $52,500 · Community ImprovementLatino Network Action Fund — $46,400 · Community ImprovementPENNSYLVANIA STANDS UP INC — $35,000 · Community ImprovementPOWER CALIFORNIA — $27,750 · Community ImprovementFAIR COUNT INC — $25,000 · Community ImprovementGALEO LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOP FUND INC — $25,000 · Community ImprovementVOICE OF THE EXPERIENCED VOTE — $75,000 · Crime & LegalIN OUR OWN VOICE NATIONAL BLACK WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE AGENDA — $50,000 · Crime & LegalZEROV INC — $26,177 · Crime & LegalINITIATE JUSTICE — $25,000 · Crime & LegalEssie Justice Group — $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Civil Rights$1,660,790Other$1,184,041Human Services$496,000Environment$437,750Health$260,000Community Improvement$211,650Crime & Legal$186,177

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIDES CENTER — $220,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPUSHBLACK — $120,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetALABAMA FORWARD — $100,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetA HEALTHIER DEMOCRACY INC — $100,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetAfter Violence Project — $95,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetENGAGE MIAMI INC — $95,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetIFWHENHOW — $75,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUltraViolet Education Fund — $75,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetVOICE OF THE EXPERIENCED VOTE — $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRANSGENDER DISTRICT — $75,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetURGE UNITE FOR REPRODUCTIVE & GENDER EQUITY — $75,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetACCION POLITICA PCUNISTA DBA PCUN — $66,400 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM — $62,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetIMAGINE BLACK — $61,875 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetNATIONAL LATINA INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE — $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE — $60,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetRewire News Group — $60,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE — $60,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCENTER FOR INTERCULTURAL ORGANIZING — $51,950 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetIN OUR OWN VOICE NATIONAL BLACK WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE AGENDA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGeorgia Muslim Voter Project — $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetADVOCATES FOR YOUTH — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCASA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSROADS CULTURAL ARTS CENTER — $50,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetLatino Network Action Fund — $46,400 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetNAYA ACTION FUND — $45,025 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetABORTION CARE NETWORK — $45,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc — $45,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ORDINARY PEOPLE SOCIETY TOPS — $45,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetEQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetONEAMERICA VOTES — $42,900 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSTAND — $40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGREENFAITH INC — $37,233 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetAsian Pacific Environmental Network — $37,233 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJUSTICE OUTSIDE — $37,232 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE — $35,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATION FUND — $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget350 NEW HAMPSHIRE — $35,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA STANDS UP INC — $35,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetREWILD — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetClimate Mobilization Project Inc — $35,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetGROW DAT YOUTH FARM — $35,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetWashington Interfaith Network — $35,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCLEAN PRODUCTION ACTION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NEO Philanthropy IncAmalgamated Charitabl…Tides FoundationThe Ford FoundationNew Venture FundProteus Fund IncThe David and Lucile …The Overbrook Foundat…Wellspring Philanthro…Silicon Valley Commun…The Community Foundat…Rockefeller Philanthr…
NEO Philanthropy IncNY60.2× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · The Ford Foundation · New Venture Fund · Proteus Fund Inc · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Overbrook Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Progressive Multiplier Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Ideas for Us Inc — 35% of income from government
  • Center for Intercultural Organizing — 28% of income from government
  • Coalition of Communities of Color — 15% of income from government
  • Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Hope Community Center Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Infact Dba Corporate Accountability — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Progressive Multiplier Fund?

Find your warmest path to Progressive Multiplier Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines