· Private foundation
Prince Street Foundation
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k6 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $151k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $147k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BRONXWORKS | $74,500 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $72,500 |
| CHAPEL & YORK FOUNDATION INC | $41,500 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON | $38,000 |
| THE READING TEAM | $38,000 |
| HANDS ALONG THE NILE DEVELOPMENT | $23,000 |
| APEX FOR YOUTH | $10,000 |
| CARING FOR CAMBODIA | $7,500 |
| EMPOWER | $5,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICAN ADVANCING JUSTICE | $5,000 |
| THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND | $2,000 |
| ST JUDE'S CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $1,000 |
| PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $280k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BRONXWORKS INC3× · 2020–2022 · $102k · revenue +57%- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC2× · 2018–2022 · $83k · revenue +80%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON INC3× · 2020–2022 · $75k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- YIYCAB INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2021 · $25k
THE HOWARD UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +47%- NYNEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATIONone grant, 2020 · $11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…
City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
Partnership with children's mission is to strengthen the emotional, social, and cognitive skills of children in new york city so they can succeed in school, society, and life.
Cna is a non-profit research organization that operates the center for naval analyses, a federally funded research center that has supported the navy and marine corps for nearly seventy years, and the institute for public research that…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)
Hellenic classical charter school (hccs) was organized to prepare all students intellectually, socially and emotionally, so they may gain entry to and succeed in the best high schools in new york city.
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese-American Planning Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds READING TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds BRONXWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON INC ↗
- Who funds CHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HANDS ALONG THE NILE DEVELOPMENT SE ↗
- Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CARING FOR CAMBODIA INC ↗
- Who funds APEX FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds UPTURN ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC ↗
- Who funds CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CHINESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH HEMPSTEAD INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF NIAGARA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds PELOTONIA ↗
- Who funds JERSEY BATTERED WOMEN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds GEOHAZARDS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MIRACLEFEET ↗
- Who funds Chinese for Affirmative Action ↗
- Who funds PRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds Honnold Foundation ↗
- Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECT TO COMPETE INC ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
- Who funds READ 718 INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Prince Street Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jersey Battered Women's Service Inc — 40% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Prince Street Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Prince Street Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.