How much did PRINCE STREET FOUNDATION grant in FY2022?

Human Services$290kInternational$128kPhilanthropy$62kEducation$25kArts & Culture$13kCommunity Improvement$11kCivil Rights$5kFood & Nutrition$4kEnvironment$2kOther$225k

02FY2022 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

Under $10k6 grants · $21k
$10k–50k5 grants · $151k
$50k–250k2 grants · $147k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

BRONXWORKS$74,500
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$72,500
CHAPEL & YORK FOUNDATION INC$41,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON$38,000
THE READING TEAM$38,000
HANDS ALONG THE NILE DEVELOPMENT$23,000
APEX FOR YOUTH$10,000
CARING FOR CAMBODIA$7,500
ASIAN AMERICAN ADVANCING JUSTICE$5,000
EMPOWER$5,000
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$2,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND$500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $280k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21% — the area typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$602k · 14 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$602k

$157k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%

+139%

Still filing today

79%

57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationInternationalArts & CultureFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BRONXWORKS
3× · 2020–2022 · $102k · revenue +84%
IR
International Rescue Committee
2× · 2018–2022 · $83k · revenue +110%
BA
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON
3× · 2020–2022 · $75k · revenue +62%

Funded once

G
Give2Asia
one grant, 2017 · $32k · revenue -12%
YI
YCAB INTERNATIONAL INC
one grant, 2021 · $25k
Howard Universitygraduated
one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Community Partners International

Empower vulnerable communities in asia to thrive through equitable access to essential health, humanitarian, and sustainable development services.

Human Services

New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes.

Education

Hellenic Classical Charter

Public charter school that prepares students intellectually, socially and emotionally, so they may gain entry to and succeed in the best high schools in new york city.

Education

University of New Haven

See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education

American Jewish World Service Inc

We work to realize human rights and end poverty in africa, asia, latin america and the caribbean.

International

City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture

New York City Energy Efficiency

Delivering financing solutions and advancing markets for energy efficiency and clean energy.

Environment

City Year Inc

City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, diverse teams of city year americorps members cultivate…

Unclassified

Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Charter school based in various sections of the bronx, serving grades k-8. the school was established to prepare young people from new york city to compete for admission to, and succeed in, top public, private, and parochial schools. bcse…

Education

Internationals Network for Public

To provide quality education for recent arrived immigrants by growing and sustaining a strong national network of innovative international high schools, while broadening its impact by sharing proven best practices and influencing policy…

—

Global Fund for Children

To advance the rights and opportunities of children and youth worldwide.

Arts & Culture

Brooklyn Community Foundation

Spark lasting social justice change, mobilizing people, capital, & expertise for a fair brooklyn.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Child Center of Ny Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Howard University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/25

the rest of the field

10,118/120,735

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

23/23

Grantees still filing

20/23

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$290,000Other$236,250International$128,350Philanthropy$62,000Education$25,476Arts & Culture$13,000Community Improvement$10,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA16× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Warburg Pincus Foundation · Select Equity Group Foundation · First Eagle Investments Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PRINCE STREET FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Chinese American Association of North Hempstead.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 113377867 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Chinese American Association of North Hempstead, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Prince Street Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Prince Street Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PRINCE STREET FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Prince Street Foundation?

More from the funding graph

PRINCE STREET FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Prince Street Foundation?

More from the funding graph