· Public charity
Prevent Child Abuse America
PREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA's (pca america) mission is to prevent child abuse and neglect before it occurs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KENTUCKY YOUTH ADVOCATES | $33,000 |
| SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK | $33,000 |
| CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE IN SUNSET PARK | $33,000 |
| FAMILIES FORWARD VIRGINIA (PCA-VA) | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $803k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KYKENTUCKY YOUTH ADVOCATES INC4× · 2022–2025 · $267k · revenue +4%
- SBSASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK INC4× · 2022–2025 · $209k · revenue +31%
- CFCENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE IN SUNSET PARK INC4× · 2022–2025 · $198k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- SOSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECTone grant, 2022 · $140k · revenue -28%
- KCKANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUEone grant, 2022 · $124k · revenue +9%
- POPUEBLO OF NAMBEone grant, 2022 · $99k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To prevent child abuse and strengthen families.
The mission of Family Nurturing Center is to end the cycle of child abuse by promoting individual well-being and healthy family relationships. We envision a world with safe children, thriving families and nurturing communities and offer a…
To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.
The mission is to serve children who are victims of sexual and severe physical abuse through prevention, education, and intervention.
The mission of the Mountain Child Advocacy Center is to prevent harm, protect children and heal families through best practice programs and community collaboration.
Provide nbsp;community nbsp;prevention nbsp;and nbsp;awareness nbsp;programs nbsp;related nbsp;to nbsp;child nbsp;abuse nbsp;and nbsp;neglect
The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…
The mission of Childs Place is to listen to children in a safe developmentally sensitive and legally sound manner; to unite professionals in a coordinated response to child abuse; to guide children and families toward healing through…
Our mission is to end child abuse and neglect through educating, advocating, and counseling to empower and strengthen children and families. Our vision is that all children live in a safe, healthy, and nurturing environment.
To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.
Our mission is to prevent, interrupt and repair cycles of abuse and neglect within families.Our vision is safe children, healthy families, thriving communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Trust of South Carolina and the most unlike its peers is Our Sister Our Brother. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KENTUCKY YOUTH ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK INC ↗
- Who funds OUR SISTER OUR BROTHER ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE IN SUNSET PARK INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds FamilyWise Services ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY COUNCIL ON CHILD ABUSE D/B/A PREVENT CHILD ABUSE KENTUCKY ↗
- Who funds Illuminate Colorado ↗
- Who funds COLLABORATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds EVOLUTION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Villages of Indiana Inc ↗
- Who funds THE OUNCE OF PREVENTION FUND OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds ALASKA CHILDREN'S TRUST ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE CHILDREN'S TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds Prevent Child Abuse Oregon ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Prevent Child Abuse America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Prevent Child Abuse Oregon — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.