Skip to content
Presence Chicago Hospitals Network at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Presence Chicago Hospitals Network

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable.

$59M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$57M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$65MEducation$2.1MReligion$71kCrime & Legal$58kFood & Nutrition$23kEmployment$22kHuman Services$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $123k
  • $250k+2 grants · $58M
$702,451
Median grant
1
States reached
$293M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Catholic Health Foundation of Northern Illinois$57,342,113
Primecare Community Health Inc$702,451
Catholic Bishop of Chicago$65,310
ADVOCATIA SOLUTIONS INC$57,565
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ASIAN HUMAN SERVICES INC: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

15%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 5 repeat orgs$58M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$10M
$134k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PrimeCare Community Health Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $7.8M · revenue +127%
  • SB
    SOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +4%
  • Community Health NFP
    2× · 2023–2024 · $17k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • IP
    Illinois Public Health Institutegraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +65%
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Health Partnership of Illinois

Strive to improve the health and well being of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and other medically vulnerable populations by providing quality accessable, affordable, and culturally responsive health care within the community we serve.

Health
2
Illinois Health and Hospital Association

To advocate for and support hospitals and health systems as they serve patients and communities in illinois.

—
3
Mchc Chicago Hospital Council

The mission of mchc chicago hospital council is to foster, promote, support, develop and encourage charitable, educational, scholastic and scientific purposes; promote cooperative effort and action between hospitals and other health care…

Health
4
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
5
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
6
Chicago Family Health Center Inc

Chicago family health center will promote health, work to prevent disease and provide treatment through the delivery of quality, accessible primary healtcare that is culturally sensitive, affordable, and responsive to community and…

—
7
North Shore Health Care Foundation

To expand equitable health care and healthy living in Cook County and champion solutions through funding, education and advocacy.

Health
8
Illinois Academy of Family Physicians

To promote excellence in the health and well-being of people of illinois through support and education of family physicians and the families and communities they serve.

—
9
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
12
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Nfp; the most unlike its peers is Des Plaines Chamber of Commerce and Industry Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $57,342,113 · OtherCATHOLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN ILLINOISPrimeCare Community Health Inc: $7,834,386 · OtherPrimeCare Community Health Inc+7 more: $176,015 · OtherResurrection University: $2,143,128 · EducationIllinois Public Health Institute: $74,800 · HealthSOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC: $17,525 · HealthCommunity Health NFP: $16,790 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7,500 · HealthGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,000 · Food & NutritionASIAN HUMAN SERVICES: $6,000 · Human Services
Other$65,352,514Education$2,143,128Health$116,615Food & Nutrition$15,000Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPrimeCare Community Health Inc: $7,834,386 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetResurrection University: $2,143,128 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetIllinois Public Health Institute: $74,800 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDes Plaines Chamber of Commerce and Industry Foundation: $22,140 over 3y, 14% of budgetSOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC: $17,525 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCommunity Health NFP: $16,790 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN HUMAN SERVICES: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF CHICAGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE 100 CLUB OF ILLINOIS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community…United Way of Metropo…Michael Reese Health …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Chicago Community TrustIL16.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Michael Reese Health Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Presence Chicago Hospitals Network funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Presence Chicago Hospitals Network. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Presence Chicago Hospitals Network’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home