Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Presence Chicago Hospitals Network

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable.

$59M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$57M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$65MEducation$2.1MReligion$71kCrime & Legal$58kFood & Nutrition$23kEmployment$22kHuman Services$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $123k
  • $250k+2 grants · $58M
$702,451
Median grant
1
States reached
$293M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Catholic Health Foundation of Northern Illinois$57,342,113
Primecare Community Health Inc$702,451
Catholic Bishop of Chicago$65,310
ADVOCATIA SOLUTIONS INC$57,565
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ASIAN HUMAN SERVICES INC: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

15%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 5 repeat orgs$58M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$10M
$134k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PrimeCare Community Health Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $7.8M · revenue +127%
  • SB
    SOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +4%
  • Community Health NFP
    2× · 2023–2024 · $17k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • IP
    Illinois Public Health Institutegraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +65%
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Health Partnership of Illinois

Strive to improve the health and well being of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and other medically vulnerable populations by providing quality accessable, affordable, and culturally responsive health care within the community we serve.

Health
2
Illinois Health and Hospital Association

To advocate for and support hospitals and health systems as they serve patients and communities in illinois.

3
Mchc Chicago Hospital Council

The mission of mchc chicago hospital council is to foster, promote, support, develop and encourage charitable, educational, scholastic and scientific purposes; promote cooperative effort and action between hospitals and other health care…

Health
4
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
5
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
6
Chicago Family Health Center Inc

Chicago family health center will promote health, work to prevent disease and provide treatment through the delivery of quality, accessible primary healtcare that is culturally sensitive, affordable, and responsive to community and…

7
North Shore Health Care Foundation

To expand equitable health care and healthy living in Cook County and champion solutions through funding, education and advocacy.

Health
8
Illinois Academy of Family Physicians

To promote excellence in the health and well-being of people of illinois through support and education of family physicians and the families and communities they serve.

9
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

12
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Nfp and the most unlike its peers is Des Plaines Chamber of Commerce and Industry Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CATHOLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS — $57,342,113 · OtherCATHOLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN ILLINOISPrimeCare Community Health Inc — $7,834,386 · OtherPrimeCare Community Health Inc+7 more — $176,015 · OtherResurrection University — $2,143,128 · EducationIllinois Public Health Institute — $74,800 · HealthSOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC — $17,525 · HealthCommunity Health NFP — $16,790 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $7,500 · HealthGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $15,000 · Food & NutritionASIAN HUMAN SERVICES — $6,000 · Human Services
Other$65,352,514Education$2,143,128Health$116,615Food & Nutrition$15,000Human Services$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPrimeCare Community Health Inc — $7,834,386 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetResurrection University — $2,143,128 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetIllinois Public Health Institute — $74,800 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDes Plaines Chamber of Commerce and Industry Foundation — $22,140 over 3y, 14% of budgetSOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC — $17,525 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCommunity Health NFP — $16,790 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN HUMAN SERVICES — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF CHICAGO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE 100 CLUB OF ILLINOIS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL16.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Michael Reese Health Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Presence Chicago Hospitals Network funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph