Skip to content
Presbyterian Medical Care Corp at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Presbyterian Medical Care Corp

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time.

$452k
Granted FY2022
15
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$59k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$463kEducation$338kCommunity Improvement$169kHuman Services$162kArts & Culture$67kPublic Benefit$20kHousing & Shelter$19kRecreation & Sports$13k
02FY2022 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $320,355, the rows itemized in this filing. The $452,310 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $131,955 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $261k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $59k
$17,100
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WINGATE UNIVERSITY$59,000
MATTHEWS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC$49,300
MATTHEWS ALIVE INC$27,000
MATTHEWS HELP CENTER$23,000
UNION COUNTY COMMUNITY SHELTER$19,300
UNION COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION$18,000
MATTHEWS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$17,955
BRIGHT BLESSINGS$17,100
CHRIST OUR SHEPHERD MINISTRIES INC$15,000
COUNCIL ON AGING IN UNION COUNTY$15,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES OF UNION COUNTY INC$15,000
MATTHEWS ATHLETIC & RECREATION ASSOCIATION$12,500
UNION COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$11,700
TOWN OF MATTHEWS$10,500
SENIOR ACTIVITIES & SERVICES INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%YMCA OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $6k → 10%UNION COUNTY COMMUNITY SHELTER: $19k → 7%BRIGHT BLESSINGS: $17k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 8 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-6%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MATTHEWS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $448k · revenue +55%
  • WU
    WINGATE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2022 · $312k · revenue +26%
  • MC
    MATTHEWS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $97k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • TP
    TURNING POINT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue -18%
  • ROWAN-CABARRUS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -27%
  • MH
    MINT HILL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Monroe-Union County Community

To help all union county nc residents gain access to affordable housing, decent jobs, and to develop a sense of security.

Housing & Shelter
2
Union County Council On Aging

To promote the mental social and physical welfare of seniors in Union County SC. To operate senior centers providing group dining home delivered meals transportation homemaker services and material support to seniors 60 and older.

Human Services
3
Burke County Chamber of Commerce I Burke County Chamber of Commerce I

To promote and advance commerce in burke county, nc

—
4
Union County Chamber of Commerce

Promotion of Industry/ Business in Union

—
5
Union County Crisis Assistance Ministry Inc

The mission of union county crisis assistance ministry is to help families with an urgent financial emergency to meet essential needs and to, once again, become self-sufficient. the primary objective of the crisis intervention program is…

Human Services
6
Yadkin Valley Chamber of Commerce

The Yadkin Valley Chamber of Commerce is an organization that promotes a positive business environment, community betterment and supports economic development

—
7
Charlotte Medical Dental and Pharmaceutical Association
Health
8
Union County Ymca

Help members and local residents develop christian personalities and to aid in building a christian society through improvement of physical, mental, social, moral and educational conditions of persons who participate in ymca programs and…

Human Services
9
University City Connect

University City Connect engages businesses & organizations in University City, Charlotte, creating partnerships & volunteer opportunities that strengthen our community. By identifying & coordinating resources to meet needs in our public…

Youth Development
10
Moore County Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the Moore County Chamber of Commerce is to foster a vibrant business community. In 2020, the chamber hosed a series of training opportunities including Moore County Leadership Institute.

—
11
Davie County Chamber of Commerce

To advance the economic and civic interests of the business communinity in davie county, nc and to provide services for chamber members.

—
12
One Charlotte Health Alliance Llc

The ONE Charlotte Health Alliance Mission is to convene and align partnerships to improve health in under served communities

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Matthews Help Center; the most unlike its peers is Union County Public Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MATTHEWS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC: $448,317 · HealthMATTHEWS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC+1 more: $15,000 · HealthWINGATE UNIVERSITY: $311,712 · EducationWINGATE UNIVERSITYUnion County Public Education Foundation: $18,000 · EducationUnion County Public Education…MATTHEWS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $96,500 · OtherMATTHEWS CHAMBER OF COMMERCEUNION COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $65,955 · OtherUNION COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMME…SENIOR ACTIVITIES & SERVICES INC: $56,000 · OtherSENIOR ACTIVITIES & SERVICES …MATTHEWS HELP CENTER: $42,250 · OtherMATTHEWS HELP CENTERTOWN OF MATTHEWS: $20,000 · OtherTOWN OF MATTHEWSCOUNCIL ON AGING IN UNION COUNTY: $15,000 · OtherMATTHEWS ATHLETIC AND RECREATION ASSOCIATION: $12,500 · Other+2 more: $14,500 · OtherMatthews Alive Inc: $67,000 · Arts & CultureUnion County Community Shelter: $19,300 · Human ServicesBRIGHT BLESSINGS: $17,100 · Human ServicesTURNING POINT INC: $10,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $5,663 · Human ServicesCHRIST OUR SHEPHERD MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 · Religion
Health$463,317Education$329,712Other$322,705Arts & Culture$67,000Human Services$52,563Religion$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMATTHEWS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC: $448,317 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetWINGATE UNIVERSITY: $311,712 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMATTHEWS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $96,500 over 6y, 8.6% of budgetMatthews Alive Inc: $67,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetUNION COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $65,955 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetSENIOR ACTIVITIES & SERVICES INC: $56,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetMATTHEWS HELP CENTER: $42,250 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetUnion County Community Shelter: $19,300 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUnion County Public Education Foundation: $18,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetBRIGHT BLESSINGS: $17,100 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING IN UNION COUNTY: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCommunity Health Services of Union County Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHRIST OUR SHEPHERD MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMATTHEWS ATHLETIC AND RECREATION ASSOCIATION: $12,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTURNING POINT INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetROWAN-CABARRUS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMINT HILL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $6,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $5,663 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Novant Health IncDuke Energy FoundationFoundation for the Ca…The Leon Levine Found…True Homes Foundation…United Way of Greater…Merancas Foundation I…The Winston-Salem Fou…Wells Fargo FoundationPublix Super Markets …The Bank of America C…Natl Christian Charit…
Novant Health IncNC32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Novant Health Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Leon Levine Foundation · True Homes Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Merancas Foundation Inc · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Presbyterian Medical Care Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Presbyterian Medical Care Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Presbyterian Medical Care’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home