Skip to content

· Public charity

Powerhouse Foundation

PHF purpose is to glorify Jesus Christ by positively impacting people in our community by meeting their physical, spiritual, financial, and emotional needs.

$401k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$163k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Religion$1.2MHuman Services$175kHealth$135kFood & Nutrition$114kEducation$78kHousing & Shelter$25kPublic Benefit$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$10k
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $293,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $401,132 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $107,632 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $259k
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Freed People$162,500
The Fountains Counseling Center$96,000
Communities in Schools Greater Tarrant County$13,000
Chisholm Trail 100 Club Inc$10,000
Support our Soldiers$6,000
Support our Soldiers$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $227k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Freed People: $163k → 11%Crowley House of Hope: $64k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$977k · 6 repeat orgs$751k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against -51% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$977k
$578k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
-51%

Still filing today

67%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $173k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthEducationPublic BenefitPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $78k · revenue +89%
  • UG
    Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County
    3× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue +74%
  • PD
    Parents Defeating Autism Today
    2× · 2020–2021 · $21k · revenue +465%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $114k · revenue -80%
  • PC
    PATHWAY CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BURLESON
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • FB
    First Baptist Burleson
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cabarrus Cooperative Christian Ministry

To respond to the growing need in our community by providing immediate assistance to residents of Concord, Kannapolis, and Cabarrus County, NC who are experiencing crisis in the areas of food, shelter or finances while providing them…

—
2
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
3
Ronald McDonald House of Dallas Inc

Our mission is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. We support the health and well-being of seriously ill or injured children receiving treatment in the…

—
4
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services
5
Family Promise of Collin County

Family promise is part of a national organization that provides food, shelter, and support services during resettlement of homeless families in church facilities and temporary housing. we also provide cars for our guests to drive to work…

Human Services
6
Household of Faith Arlington Charities

To provide temporary assistance to needy families and individuals in tarrant county

Human Services
7
Coalition for the Homeless of Houston Harris County

The coalition for the homeless of houston/harris county acts as a catalyst, uniting partners and maximizing resources to move people experiencing homelessness into permanent housing with supportive services.

Housing & Shelter
8
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
9
Trauma Support Services of North Texas

The mission of Trauma Support Services is to provide healing and resilience for individuals and communities affected by trauma through accessible mental health therapy and trauma-informed education.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
The Sanctuary Foster Care Services

Achieving permanent sanctuary and healing homes for children and families from hard places.

Human Services
11
Hearts Full of Love

to share Jesus with those we minister to regardless of social status by first meeting their physical needs and, through that relationship, meeting their spiritual needs.

Human Services
12
Community Homeless Solutions

To lead in ending the cycle of homelessness or violence by providing safe housing, compassionate support, and opportunities for self-sufficiency through outreach, emergency shelter, transitional housing and supporting services.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House of Fort Worth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Support Our Soldiers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE@FOUNTAINS FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $608,001 · OtherTHE@FOUNTAINS FELLOWSHIP CHURCHOPEN DOOR FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES INC: $215,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES INCPATHWAY CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BURLESON: $100,000 · OtherPATHWAY CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BURLESONFirst Baptist Burleson: $100,000 · OtherFirst Baptist BurlesonYOUR HARVEST HOUSE: $50,000 · OtherFirst United Methodist Church: $50,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH CROWLEY TX: $50,000 · OtherGraceview Baptist Church: $50,000 · Other+1 more: $25,100 · OtherFreed People: $162,500 · Human ServicesFreed PeopleCrowley House of Hope: $64,250 · Human ServicesCrowley House …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $114,100 · HealthParents Defeating Autism Today: $20,883 · HealthCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC: $78,000 · EducationSUPPORT OUR SOLDIERS: $30,000 · Public BenefitChisolm Trail 100 Club: $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,248,101Human Services$226,750Health$134,983Education$78,000Public Benefit$30,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFreed People: $162,500 over 2y, 20% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $114,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC: $78,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCrowley House of Hope: $64,250 over 1y, 20% of budgetYOUR HARVEST HOUSE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSUPPORT OUR SOLDIERS: $30,000 over 5y, 31% of budgetUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant County: $25,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetParents Defeating Autism Today: $20,883 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetChisolm Trail 100 Club: $10,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Freed People ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Crowley House of Hope ↗
  • Who funds YOUR HARVEST HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SUPPORT OUR SOLDIERS ↗
  • Who funds Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County ↗
  • Who funds Parents Defeating Autism Today ↗
  • Who funds Chisolm Trail 100 Club ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX13.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Ken W Davis Foundation · America's Charities · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Powerhouse Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Powerhouse Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Powerhouse Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Powerhouse Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $344k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Powerhouse’s filings →

    More from the funding graph