Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Powerhouse Foundation

PHF purpose is to glorify Jesus Christ by positively impacting people in our community by meeting their physical, spiritual, financial, and emotional needs.

$401k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$163k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Religion$1.2MHuman Services$175kHealth$135kFood & Nutrition$114kEducation$78kHousing & Shelter$25kPublic Benefit$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$10k
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $293,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $401,132 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $107,632 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $259k
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Freed People$162,500
The Fountains Counseling Center$96,000
Communities in Schools Greater Tarrant County$13,000
Chisholm Trail 100 Club Inc$10,000
Support our Soldiers$6,000
Support our Soldiers$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $227k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Freed People: $163k → 11%Crowley House of Hope: $64k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$977k · 6 repeat orgs$751k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against -51% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$977k
$578k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
-51%

Still filing today

67%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $173k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthEducationPublic BenefitPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $78k · revenue +89%
  • UG
    Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County
    3× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue +74%
  • PD
    Parents Defeating Autism Today
    2× · 2020–2021 · $21k · revenue +465%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $114k · revenue -80%
  • FB
    First Baptist Burleson
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • PC
    PATHWAY CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BURLESON
    one grant, 2020 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cabarrus Cooperative Christian Ministry

To respond to the growing need in our community by providing immediate assistance to residents of Concord, Kannapolis, and Cabarrus County, NC who are experiencing crisis in the areas of food, shelter or finances while providing them…

2
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
3
Houston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Houston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to provide a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
4
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services
5
Ronald McDonald House of Dallas Inc

Our mission is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. We support the health and well-being of seriously ill or injured children receiving treatment in the…

6
Family Promise of Collin County

Family promise is part of a national organization that provides food, shelter, and support services during resettlement of homeless families in church facilities and temporary housing. we also provide cars for our guests to drive to work…

Human Services
7
Household of Faith Arlington Charities

To provide temporary assistance to needy families and individuals in tarrant county

Human Services
8
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
9
Coalition for the Homeless of Houston Harris County

The coalition for the homeless of houston/harris county acts as a catalyst, uniting partners and maximizing resources to move people experiencing homelessness into permanent housing with supportive services.

Housing & Shelter
10
Hearts Full of Love

to share Jesus with those we minister to regardless of social status by first meeting their physical needs and, through that relationship, meeting their spiritual needs.

Human Services
11
Trauma Support Services of North Texas

The mission of Trauma Support Services is to provide healing and resilience for individuals and communities affected by trauma through accessible mental health therapy and trauma-informed education.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
The Sanctuary Foster Care Services

Achieving permanent sanctuary and healing homes for children and families from hard places.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House of Fort Worth Inc and the most unlike its peers is Support Our Soldiers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE@FOUNTAINS FELLOWSHIP CHURCH — $608,001 · OtherTHE@FOUNTAINS FELLOWSHIP CHURCHOPEN DOOR FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES INC — $215,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES INCFirst Baptist Burleson — $100,000 · OtherFirst Baptist BurlesonPATHWAY CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BURLESON — $100,000 · OtherPATHWAY CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BURLESONGraceview Baptist Church — $50,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH CROWLEY TX — $50,000 · OtherYOUR HARVEST HOUSE — $50,000 · OtherFirst United Methodist Church — $50,000 · Other+1 more — $25,100 · OtherFreed People — $162,500 · Human ServicesFreed PeopleCrowley House of Hope — $64,250 · Human ServicesCrowley House …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $114,100 · HealthParents Defeating Autism Today — $20,883 · HealthCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC — $78,000 · EducationSUPPORT OUR SOLDIERS — $30,000 · Public BenefitChisolm Trail 100 Club — $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,248,101Human Services$226,750Health$134,983Education$78,000Public Benefit$30,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFreed People — $162,500 over 2y, 20% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $114,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC — $78,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCrowley House of Hope — $64,250 over 1y, 20% of budgetYOUR HARVEST HOUSE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSUPPORT OUR SOLDIERS — $30,000 over 5y, 31% of budgetUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant County — $25,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetParents Defeating Autism Today — $20,883 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetChisolm Trail 100 Club — $10,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Freed People
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Crowley House of Hope
  • Who funds YOUR HARVEST HOUSE
  • Who funds SUPPORT OUR SOLDIERS
  • Who funds Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County
  • Who funds Parents Defeating Autism Today
  • Who funds Chisolm Trail 100 Club

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX13.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Ken W Davis Foundation · America's Charities · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Powerhouse Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Powerhouse Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Powerhouse Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $344k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph