Skip to content
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center

Our mission - Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center (pvhmc) is dedicated to providing high-quality, cost-effective health care services to residents of the greater pomona valley.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$5.8MHuman Services$336kYouth Development$86kPhilanthropy$16kEducation$10k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
$70,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$823M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION & TRUST$1,502,660
AGING NEXT$70,000
BOYS REPUBLIC$7,794
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $367k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOYS REPUBLIC GENERAL FUND: $15k → 14%WOODS HEALTH SERVICES: $25k → 14%BOYS REPUBLIC: $8k → 14%BOYS REPUBLIC: $8k → 14%AGING NEXT: $70k → 14%AGING NEXT: $40k → 14%AGING NEXT: $35k → 14%AGING NEXT: $28k → 14%SHOES THAT FIT: $15k → 14%SHOES THAT FIT: $15k → 14%SHOES THAT FIT: $15k → 14%COMMUNITY SENIOR SERVICE: $10k → 14%SHOES THAT FIT: $10k → 14%NAPIER INITIATIVE: $10k → 14%NAPIER INITIATIVE: $10k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $8k → 14%THE NAPIER INITIATIVE: $8k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $8k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $8k → 14%THE NAPIER INITIATIVE: $8k → 14%POMONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%POMONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.2M · 8 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +149% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$6.2M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+149%
+48%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AGINGNEXT INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $183k · revenue +173%
  • KG
    Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences
    3× · 2017–2022 · $125k · revenue +12%
  • CC
    Casa Colina Centers for Rehabilitation Foundation
    7× · 2017–2023 · $89k · revenue +152%

Funded once

  • BH
    Brethren Hillcrest Homesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +48%
  • BP
    BRIGHT PROSPECT
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
2
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
3
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
4
Pomona Community Health Center

Pomona community health center's mission is to be the medical home for the underserved in our community by providing high quality preventive and primary care health services.

Health
5
Pasadena Bio Collaborative Incubator

Pasadena bio collaborative incubator is a nonprofit organization focused on economic development and job creation in southern california. we encourage the growth of an innovative biotechnology industry by providing educational/training…

Science & Tech
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
8
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
9
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
10
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
11
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
12
Barlow Respiratory Hospital

A not-for-profit, long-term acute care specialty healthcare organization is to improve the quality of life for patients with respiratory and other diseases that may require prolonged acute hospitalization of specialized treatment.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys Republic; the most unlike its peers is Agingnext Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST: $5,558,824 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUSTAGINGNEXT INC: $182,916 · Human ServicesSHOES THAT FIT: $70,092 · Human ServicesPILGRIM PLACE: $57,500 · Human ServicesBoys Republic: $25,724 · Human ServicesBrethren Hillcrest Homes: $25,000 · Human ServicesPomona Community Foundation: $15,500 · Human ServicesKeck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences: $125,000 · EducationBRIGHT PROSPECT: $10,000 · EducationCasa Colina Centers for Rehabilitation Foundation: $89,400 · HealthYOUTH AND FAMILY CLUB OF POMONA VALLEY: $60,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$5,558,824Human Services$376,732Education$135,000Health$89,400Youth Development$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST: $5,558,824 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetAGINGNEXT INC: $182,916 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetKeck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences: $125,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCasa Colina Centers for Rehabilitation Foundation: $89,400 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSHOES THAT FIT: $70,092 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY CLUB OF POMONA VALLEY: $60,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetPILGRIM PLACE: $57,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBoys Republic: $25,724 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBrethren Hillcrest Homes: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPomona Community Foundation: $15,500 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetBRIGHT PROSPECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rose Hills Founda…The Ralph M Parsons F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…California Community …Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Rose Hills FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · California Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center?

    Find your warmest path to Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home