Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center

Our mission - Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center (pvhmc) is dedicated to providing high-quality, cost-effective health care services to residents of the greater pomona valley.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$5.8MHuman Services$336kYouth Development$86kPhilanthropy$16kEducation$10k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
$70,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$823M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION & TRUST$1,502,660
AGING NEXT$70,000
BOYS REPUBLIC$7,794
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $367k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOYS REPUBLIC GENERAL FUND: $15k → 14%WOODS HEALTH SERVICES: $25k → 14%BOYS REPUBLIC: $8k → 14%BOYS REPUBLIC: $8k → 14%AGING NEXT: $70k → 14%AGING NEXT: $40k → 14%AGING NEXT: $35k → 14%AGING NEXT: $28k → 14%SHOES THAT FIT: $15k → 14%SHOES THAT FIT: $15k → 14%SHOES THAT FIT: $15k → 14%COMMUNITY SENIOR SERVICE: $10k → 14%NAPIER INITIATIVE: $10k → 14%NAPIER INITIATIVE: $10k → 14%SHOES THAT FIT: $10k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $8k → 14%THE NAPIER INITIATIVE: $8k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $8k → 14%THE NAPIER INITIATIVE: $8k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $8k → 14%POMONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%POMONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.2M · 8 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +149% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$6.2M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+149%
+48%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AGINGNEXT INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $183k · revenue +173%
  • KG
    Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences
    3× · 2017–2022 · $125k · revenue +12%
  • CC
    Casa Colina Centers for Rehabilitation Foundation
    7× · 2017–2023 · $89k · revenue +152%

Funded once

  • BH
    Brethren Hillcrest Homesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +48%
  • BP
    BRIGHT PROSPECT
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

2
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
3
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
4
Pomona Community Health Center

Pomona community health center's mission is to be the medical home for the underserved in our community by providing high quality preventive and primary care health services.

Health
5
Pasadena Bio Collaborative Incubator

Pasadena bio collaborative incubator is a nonprofit organization focused on economic development and job creation in southern california. we encourage the growth of an innovative biotechnology industry by providing educational/training…

Science & Tech
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
8
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
9
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

10
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
11
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
12
Barlow Respiratory Hospital

A not-for-profit, long-term acute care specialty healthcare organization is to improve the quality of life for patients with respiratory and other diseases that may require prolonged acute hospitalization of specialized treatment.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys Republic and the most unlike its peers is Agingnext Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST — $5,558,824 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUSTAGINGNEXT INC — $182,916 · Human ServicesSHOES THAT FIT — $70,092 · Human ServicesPILGRIM PLACE — $57,500 · Human ServicesBoys Republic — $25,724 · Human ServicesBrethren Hillcrest Homes — $25,000 · Human ServicesPomona Community Foundation — $15,500 · Human ServicesKeck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences — $125,000 · EducationBRIGHT PROSPECT — $10,000 · EducationCasa Colina Centers for Rehabilitation Foundation — $89,400 · HealthYOUTH AND FAMILY CLUB OF POMONA VALLEY — $60,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$5,558,824Human Services$376,732Education$135,000Health$89,400Youth Development$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST — $5,558,824 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetAGINGNEXT INC — $182,916 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetKeck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences — $125,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCasa Colina Centers for Rehabilitation Foundation — $89,400 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSHOES THAT FIT — $70,092 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY CLUB OF POMONA VALLEY — $60,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetPILGRIM PLACE — $57,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBoys Republic — $25,724 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBrethren Hillcrest Homes — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPomona Community Foundation — $15,500 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetBRIGHT PROSPECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rose Hills FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · California Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center?

    Find your warmest path to Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph