Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Poduska Family Foundation Inc co Susan M Poduska

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$82k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$198kHealth$121kReligion$89kRecreation & Sports$6kHousing & Shelter$6kEducation$4kFood & Nutrition$4kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Commonwealth Shakespeare Co$54,200
St Peter's Episcopal Church$23,500
MIT - List Visual Arts Center$2,000
Boch Center for Performing Arts$1,300
Fine Arts Work Center$500
The Lenny Zakim Fund$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Dignity Matters Inc: $1k → 8%Pine Street Inn: $6k → 16%Pine Street Inn: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$379k · 12 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against +82% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
29

Total granted

$379k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+82%

Still filing today

50%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Commonwealth Shakespeare Co Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $115k · revenue +60%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    4× · 2017–2022 · $88k · revenue +132%
  • PINE STREET INN INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $6k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • LC
    LAHEY CLINIC INC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +19%
  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • BOSTON LYRIC OPERA COMPANYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +88%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
7
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
8
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
9
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
10
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
11
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lenny Zakim Fund and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts CentersIndustry & Policy AdvocacyInternational Child Develop…Local History MuseumsEarly Childhood and School-…Urban Parks & Green Space S…Supportive Housing & Homele…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr19%24%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr14%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr19%3%20–35yr14%39%35–55yr14%56%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/30
the rest of the field
11%
4,403/38,758

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
21/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST PETERS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $84,452 · OtherST PETERS EPISCOPAL CHURCHMIT Council for the Arts — $45,000 · OtherMIT Council for the ArtsBoch Center for Performing Arts — $27,800 · OtherBoch Center for Performing Arts+21 more — $28,543 · Other+21 moreThe Commonwealth Shakespeare Co Inc — $114,557 · Arts & CultureThe Commonwealth Shakespeare Co …BOSTON LYRIC OPERA COMPANY — $5,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more — $3,950 · Arts & CultureDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $87,500 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute…LAHEY CLINIC INC — $15,000 · HealthLAHEY CLINIC INC+5 more — $8,300 · Health+5 morePINE STREET INN INC — $5,825 · Human ServicesDignity Matters Inc — $1,000 · Human ServicesEMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY INC — $2,500 · Recreation & SportsMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $2,000 · EducationASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY — $2,000 · Public Benefit
Other$185,795Arts & Culture$123,507Health$110,800Human Services$6,825Recreation & Sports$2,500Education$2,000Public Benefit$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Commonwealth Shakespeare Co Inc — $114,557 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $87,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAHEY CLINIC INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC — $5,825 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON LYRIC OPERA COMPANY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF SCIENCE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDignity Matters Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJAMESTOWN ARTS CENTER — $650 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDKIND INTERNATIONAL INC — $600 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHermitage Artist Retreat Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LENNY ZAKIM FUND — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVINEYARD MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMORE THAN WORDS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Poduska Family Foundation Inc co Susan M Poduska funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown Inc27% of income from government
  • More Than Words Inc24% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc22% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc11% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Boston Lyric Opera Company3% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc3% of income from government
  • Lahey Clinic Inc1% of income from government
  • Hermitage Artist Retreat Inc1% of income from government
  • Emerald Necklace Conservancy Inc0% of income from government
  • Museum of Science0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph