· Private foundation
Pike & Susan Sullivan Charitable Trust Uad 08/26/16
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of PIKE & SUSAN SULLIVAN CHARITABLE TRUST UAD 08/26/16’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k11 grants · $265k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAINE RAIDER FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA | $50,000 |
| CARSON SCHOLARS FUND | $40,000 |
| MERCURY ONE | $40,000 |
| TRUE THE VOTE | $40,000 |
| TREASURE COAST MUSIC TEACHERS ASSOCIATION | $30,000 |
| SNOW LEOPARD TRUST | $25,000 |
| JUDICIAL WATCH | $25,000 |
| PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| ST AUGUSTINE WILD RESERVE | $10,000 |
| PORTSMOUTH MUSIC AND ARTS CENTER | $10,000 |
| DOLPHIN RESEARCH CENTER | $10,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against -26% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTURNING POINT USA INC4× · 2021–2024 · $270k · revenue +107%
JUDICIAL WATCH INC4× · 2021–2024 · $160k · revenue +3%- ISINTERNATIONAL SNOW LEOPARD TRUST5× · 2020–2024 · $135k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- WCWELLS COLLEGEone grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -90%
- TRTHE RAY PFEIFER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -51%
- SFSEACOAST FAMILY PROMISEone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…
Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.
The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…
Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…
Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Ray Pfeifer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL SNOW LEOPARD TRUST ↗
- Who funds CARSON SCHOLARS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds MARINE RAIDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WELLS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds DOLPHIN RESEARCH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TRUE THE VOTE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PORTSMOUTH MUSIC & ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LONG ISLAND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mercury One Inc ↗
- Who funds THE RAY PFEIFER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEACOAST FAMILY PROMISE ↗
- Who funds HAWKWATCH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pike & Susan Sullivan Charitable Trust Uad 08/26/16 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc — 7% of income from government
- Dolphin Research Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.