How much does Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc give?

Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc reported 16 itemized grants totaling $268,479, out of $306,465 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 20 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (22%), Human Services (16%), Health (13%).

Who are Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Regeneration Ministries Inc D/B/A Timothy House ($258k), Ruth House Ministries Inc ($249k), Joy House Inc ($237k).

Does Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 6% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Hammill Family Foundation Inc, Georgia Power Foundation Inc, Faithhope & Charity Recycle Store Inc.

Where is Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc based?

Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc is based in GA.

Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc

Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc

To serve the disenfranchised members of our community who find themselves in need of essential goods and basic human and life-enhancing services.

$306k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$43k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$533kHuman Services$387kHealth$329kReligion$303kCrime & Legal$281kEducation$193kFood & Nutrition$180kYouth Development$128kOther$0

02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 16 grants below total $268,479, the rows itemized in this filing. The $306,465 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $37,986 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k7 grants · $51k
$10k–50k9 grants · $217k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$602k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
Ruth House Ministries Inc	$43,479
Regeneration Ministries Inc	$33,000
CARES Inc	$31,000
Good Shepherd Recovery House	$25,000
Habitat for Humanity	$20,000
St Vincent de Paul Society	$20,000
Weekend Snack Program Inc	$15,000
Joy House Inc	$15,000
ACES Youth Home	$15,000
The Pregnancy Center	$9,000
Open Door Recovery Services	$8,000
Mountain Laurel Academy	$8,000
The Academy at Double H Ranch	$8,000
North GA Family Partners	$6,000
Angels on Horseback	$6,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $691k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$2.4M · 24 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.4M

$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%

+7%

Still filing today

83%

63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthReligionCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RM
REGENERATION MINISTRIES INC D/B/A TIMOTHY HOUSE
9× · 2017–2025 · $258k · revenue +51%
RH
RUTH HOUSE MINISTRIES INC
8× · 2017–2025 · $249k · revenue +95%
JH
Joy House Inc
9× · 2017–2025 · $237k · revenue +0%

Funded once

TP
Tater Patch Players Inc
one grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue -2%
TG
THE GENERAL COUNCIL ON FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNITED METHO
one grant, 2018 · $10k
AN
American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +39%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Angel House of Georgia Inc

Provide a rehabilitation center for women recovering from alcohol and drug addiction

Housing & Shelter

A Place of Hope North Georgia Inc

Facilitating the care of underpriveledged children including the care of foster children.

Housing & Shelter

Georgia Hope Inc

Provide Displaced Children in a loving, warm, nurturing, educational therapeutic home with foster parents until permanency can be sought or by return to biological families or placement in adoptive homes

—

House of Mercy Incorporated

To provide food, clothing, and shelter to homeless and abandoned individuals and families

—

Hendrick Home for Children

—

Hannah Grace Homes Inc

To provide a safe haven for women neglected and abused girls.

Housing & Shelter

HouseofHopeRefugeofLoveInc

Restoring our youth by turning trauma into triumph for female suvivors of child sex trafficking in Georgia.

Human Services

Cumming Home Ministries Inc

Support and sponsor those experiencing hopelessness and homelessness, through residential rehabilitation, recovery and treatment programs, Christian-based spiritual mentopring and counseling, life skills training and resources infused with…

Housing & Shelter

House of Hope Piedmont Region Minis

Ministry to Hurting Teens and Families

Youth Development

North Georgia Angel House Inc

North georgia angel house provides room, board, and oversight for short and long term care for females ages 11 to 21 who have entered the foster system.

Human Services

The Hope Center

A ministry offering a wide range of services to help meet essential needs, education advancement and counseling of individuals and families in northeast georgia. these services include providing food services, shower and laundry…

—

Divine Healing Ministries of Ga

It is a ministry of God focused on teaching the Word of God to the people.

Health

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Georgia Family Partners Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mla Educational Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

26/27

Grantees still filing

18/27

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Human Services$691,259Religion$343,069Other$518,800Crime & Legal$281,468Housing & Shelter$257,600Health$204,700Education$172,225

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hammill Family Foundation IncDE22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hammill Family Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Faithhope & Charity Recycle Store Inc · United Community Bank Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc?

Find your warmest path to Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home