· Private foundation
Hammill Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $73k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $450k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION HCSR | $40,000 |
| SAMARITANS PURSE | $30,000 |
| SAMARITANS PURSE | $30,000 |
| PICKENS PREGNANCY CENTER INC | $25,000 |
| RUTH HOUSE MINISTRIES INC | $20,000 |
| REAL BREAD OUTREACH | $20,000 |
| GLOBAL SERVANTS INC | $20,000 |
| CARES COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE RESOURCES & EMER SVCS P | $20,000 |
| BIG CANOE CHAPEL INC | $20,000 |
| HOPE FOR HAITIS CHILDREN MINISTRIES INC | $15,000 |
| STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC | $15,000 |
| OUR LADY OF THE MOUNTAINS CATHOLIC CHURCH | $15,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTH GEORGIA | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $397k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.
55 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE8× · 2017–2024 · $303k · revenue +134%
- AUATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION8× · 2017–2024 · $280k · revenue +21%
- GSGLOBAL SERVANTS INC7× · 2017–2024 · $101k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- CHCHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC - CHILDRENS HEone grant, 2022 · $30k
- SCSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue ×121
- UFUS FRIENDS OF THE VAN LEER JERUSALEM INSTITUTEone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -43%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…
Miracle hill ministries is committed to life transformation for children and adults experiencing homelessness. more information and program outcomes may be found at www.miraclehill.org.
The Orphan's Hands provides a safe home and education for orphaned youth at risk of being trafficked in high-risk countries while bringing the love and hope of Jesus.
To glorify the Lord Jesus Christ by ministering to orphans around the world by meeting spiritual, physical, emotional, and educational needs.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.
Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.
Motivated by god's love, we partner with our neighbors in need, equip volunteers, respond to disasters and strenghten communities to inspire greater hope in our world.
As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.
We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.
Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.
Our mission is to serve survivors of human trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation with a trauma-informed approach fueled by the love of Christ.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is The Mt Oglethorpe Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL SERVANTS INC ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of North Georgia Inc ↗
- Who funds SISTERS OF GRACE INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR HOSPITAL ART INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds NO LONGER BOUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Help Our Military Heroes Inc ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds LUKE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds CARES INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH GEORGIA FAMILY PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR HAITI'S CHILDREN MINISTRIES INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Joy House Inc ↗
- Who funds The Craddock Center Inc ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RUTH HOUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Pickens Co Community Resource Assoc Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · William B Orkin Foundation Inc · The Scott Hudgens Family Foundation Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · Carmax Foundation · Servant Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hammill Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.