Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Philip Boyle Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$126k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$367kFood & Nutrition$124kYouth Development$102kHealth$80kEducation$54kCrime & Legal$47kHousing & Shelter$29kAnimals$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $91k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$15,000
SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES$10,000
NORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
TEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS$5,000
FOSTERING FUTURES$5,000
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OKLAHOMA$5,000
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION$5,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF OK INC$5,000
SISU YOUTH INC$5,000
THE VIRTUE CENTER$5,000
CALM WATERS$5,000
HOMELESS ALLIANCE$5,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA IN$5,000
CITY CARE INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $338k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%DALE K GRAHAM VETERANS FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOM: $10k → 15%DALE K GRAHAM VETERANS FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOM: $5k → 15%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $15k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $15k → 13%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA: $5k → 15%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $15k → 13%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA: $5k → 15%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $10k → 13%CALM WATERS: $5k → 16%CALM WATERS: $5k → 16%SISU YOUTH INC: $5k → 16%SISU YOUTH INC: $5k → 16%SISU YOUTH INC: $5k → 16%YWCA OF OKLAHOMA CITY: $5k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 16%CALM WATERS: $5k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 16%CITY CARE INC: $5k → 16%CALM WATERS: $5k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 16%CITY CARE INC: $3k → 16%CALM WATERS: $3k → 16%CALM WATERS: $3k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%PIVOT: $7k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $5k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $5k → 16%PIVOT: $5k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $5k → 16%PIVOT: $5k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $5k → 16%YOUTH SERVICES FOR OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC: $5k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $5k → 16%PIVOT: $5k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Philip Boyle Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in OK; read by stated purpose it is 96% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Philip Boyle Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$780k · 32 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
24

Total granted

$780k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+73%

Still filing today

88%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $95k · revenue +60%
  • REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +47%
  • SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • CA
    CITIZENS ADV BD OF CLEVELAND COUNTY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • CA
    CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD OF CLEVELAN
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
2
Casa of Southern Oklahoma Inc

Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.

Civil Rights
3
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
4
Oklahoma Casa Association Inc

To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.

Human Services
5
Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

Human Services
6
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc

Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children

Crime & Legal
7
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
8
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
9
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
10
La Luz Organization Inc

La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.

Human Services
11
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
12
Oklahoma Afterschool Network Inc

Works to ensure that all children and youth in Oklahoma have access to safe and enriching learning opportunities during their out-of-school time.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Dragonfly Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Behavioral Health & Family …Veterans & First Responder …Oklahoma Arts OrganizationsHealthcare Provider AdvocacyFaith-Based Healthcare Syst…Economic Development & Civi…Educational Foundations and…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr14%36%35–55yr15%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr15%15%20–35yr14%37%35–55yr15%40%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/44
the rest of the field
14%
751/5,470

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/42
Grantees still filing
31/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $95,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INCSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC — $57,500 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INCINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INCPIVOT INC — $29,000 · Human ServicesPIVOT INCCALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesCALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES…Big Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesBig Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma IncNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC — $17,000 · Human ServicesSISU YOUTH INC — $15,000 · Human Services+4 more — $24,000 · Human Services+4 moreGIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA IN — $30,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA I…SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF OK INC — $27,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF OK INCCITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN — $17,500 · OtherCITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDRENCITIZENS ADV BD OF CLEVELAND COUNTY — $10,000 · OtherCITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD OF CLEVELAN — $10,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY — $10,000 · OtherCITIZENS ADVISORY BD OF CLEVELAND C — $10,000 · OtherFostering Futures Inc — $10,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $28,235 · OtherOKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYTEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS INC — $15,000 · OtherTEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS INC+21 more — $98,200 · Other+21 moreREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $70,000 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL FOOD …Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc — $48,500 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheel…Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — $41,500 · HealthNorman Alcohol Information Center Inc — $12,500 · HealthNORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Health+1 more — $2,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · EducationNORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationMARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE — $28,500 · Crime & LegalCASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC — $10,000 · Crime & LegalEXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF OKLAHOMA INC — $3,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $1,000 · Crime & LegalPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC — $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc — $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentLoveworks Leadership Inc — $5,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$337,500Other$265,935Food & Nutrition$118,500Health$66,000Education$45,000Crime & Legal$42,500Youth Development$33,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $95,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $70,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC — $57,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC — $50,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc — $48,500 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — $41,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPIVOT INC — $29,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE — $28,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetOKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $28,235 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $25,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc — $25,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC — $21,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN — $17,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC — $17,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSISU YOUTH INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS INC — $15,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetNORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetNorman Alcohol Information Center Inc — $12,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFostering Futures Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetDALE K GRAHAM VETERANS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY CARE INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLoveworks Leadership Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA YOUTH ORCHESTRAS INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetThe Dragonfly Home Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWARRIORS REST FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanterbury Voices Inc — $4,200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHarding Fine Arts Academy Foundation — $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFundacion Manos Juntas — $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF OKLAHOMA INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOklahoma Aids Care Fund Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOKLAHOMA CHILDRENS THEATRE INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…El and Thelma Gaylord…Communities Foundatio…Harris Foundation IncSarkeys FoundationAmerican Fidelity Fou…The Merrick FoundationKirkpatrick Family Af…Inasmuch FoundationCresap Family Foundat…Wegener Foundation IncLove Meyer Family Fou…
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK71.9× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Harris Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · Wegener Foundation Inc · Love Meyer Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Philip Boyle Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc — 52% of income from government
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc — 45% of income from government
  • Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — 8% of income from government
  • Canterbury Voices Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Pivot Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Philip Boyle Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Philip Boyle Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines