Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peter P and Bonnie B Smith Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$254kReligion$60kHealth$47kPhilanthropy$28kRecreation & Sports$18kHuman Services$11kInternational$9kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$146k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUR LADY OF DALLAS CISTERCIAN ABBEY$33,334
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CATHOLIC FOUNDATION$7,500
CISTERCIAN PREPARATORY SCHOOL$5,000
U T SOUTHWESTER MEDICAL CENTER$3,000
SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION$2,500
FOXG 1 RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
UNIV OF SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL OF LAW$1,500
HOCKADAY$1,500
CHRISTO REY DALLAS COLLEGE PREP$1,000
FRIENDS OF HARVARD GOLF$1,000
TEXAS 2036$1,000
GEORGE W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER$1,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
CA
UT
CO
VA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$385k · 27 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
9

Total granted

$385k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+10%

Still filing today

41%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthInternationalPublic BenefitReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Southern Methodist University
    4× · 2020–2023 · $35k · revenue +26%
  • SM
    SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +505%
  • TS
    THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • UC
    UNIVERSITY CATHOLIC CENTER AUSTIN TEXAS
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • Augustine Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
3
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
4
Southwestern Health Resources

To further the missions of utsw and thr on a local, regional and national level through the creation of a clinically integrated network of physicians, hospitals and other care providers to deliver healthcare across the continuum and by…

Health
5
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
6
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
Southwestern Health Resources Hospitals Joc

To create an integrated hospital system operating in the dallas area to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves without regard to their ability to pay.

Health
9
University of St Thomas

We are the University of St. Thomas, the Catholic University in the heart of Houston. We are committed to the Catholic intellectual tradition and the dialogue between faith and reason. By pursuing excellence in teaching, scholarship and…

Education
10
Texas a&M Foundation

The texas a&m foundation builds a brighter future for texas a&m university, one relationship at a time, by uniting generosity and vision to raise support and manage endowed gifts.

Education
11
Scott & White Healthcare Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH), to encourage broad-based public support of the healthcare system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is FOXG1 Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CISTERCIAN PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $182,000 · OtherCISTERCIAN PREPARATORY SCHOOLCISTERCIAN PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $33,334 · OtherCISTERCIAN PREPARATORY SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION: $16,500 · Other+24 more: $86,000 · Other+24 moreSouthern Methodist University: $35,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist Uni…SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $22,000 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL F…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES …President and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,500 · EducationPresident and Fellows …Augustine Institute Inc: $5,000 · EducationST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $4,500 · EducationTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Education+1 more: $1,500 · EducationCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,500 · HealthSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF NORTH TEXAS: $3,500 · HealthFOXG1 Research Inc: $2,500 · HealthSpirit of America Worldwide: $9,000 · InternationalUnited States Ski Team Foundation: $6,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $4,500 · PhilanthropyTexas 2036: $4,500 · Public Benefit
Other$347,834Education$97,000Health$11,500International$9,000Recreation & Sports$6,500Philanthropy$4,500Public Benefit$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouthern Methodist University: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSpirit of America Worldwide: $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUnited States Ski Team Foundation: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAugustine Institute Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTexas 2036: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF NORTH TEXAS: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS COUNTY HERITAGE SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOXG1 Research Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSalesmanship Club of Dallas: $2,107 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHANKSGIVING FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds Spirit of America Worldwide ↗
  • Who funds United States Ski Team Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds Augustine Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Texas 2036 ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF NORTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS COUNTY HERITAGE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FOXG1 Research Inc ↗
  • Who funds Salesmanship Club of Dallas ↗
  • Who funds University of San Francisco ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTX21.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Rita Crocker Clements Foundatio · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peter P and Bonnie B Smith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peter P and Bonnie B Smith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Peter P and Bonnie B Smith Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Peter P and Bonnie B Smith Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peter P and Bonnie B Smith’s filings →

More from the funding graph