Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Peter H and E Lucille Gaass Kuyper Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$637k
Granted FY2024still arriving
59
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$2.3MEducation$1.3MHealth$456kHuman Services$139kFood & Nutrition$96kReligion$85kCommunity Improvement$80kArts & Culture$80kRecreation & Sports$67kOther$1.4M
02FY2024 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k40 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $341k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $203k
$2,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL COLLEGE$80,000
PELLA OPERA HOUSE$73,000
CENTRAL COLLEGE$50,000
CREATIVE PROVIDERS FOUNDATION$23,600
CHARLES SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$23,600
PRESIDIO GRADUATE SCHOOL$23,600
CREATIVE PROVIDERS FOUNDATION$23,600
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$23,600
CHARLES SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$23,600
CHARLES SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$23,600
CHARLES AND KAREN FARVER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$23,600
CHARLES SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$23,600
CHARLES SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$23,600
CHARLES SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$23,600
CHARLES SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$23,600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 18%MARCONI FOUNDATION FOR KIDS: $500 → 10%SELAH NEIGHBORHOOD HOMELESS COALITION: $1k → 14%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC: $1k → 12%BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $5k → 6%THE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $3k → 20%TWINSTATE MAKERSPACES INC: $500 → 10%WISE: $5k → 10%SELAH NEIGHBORHOOD HOMELESS COALITION: $1k → 14%MOUNTAIN VALLEY DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $3k → 8%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 12%WISE: $1k → 10%MURRAY CALLOWAY NEED LINE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 19%SELAH NEIGHBORHOOD HOMELESS COALITION: $500 → 14%MONROE SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $16k → 10%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 12%WISE: $1k → 10%CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA: $15k → 10%CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA: $12k → 10%CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA: $10k → 10%CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA: $10k → 10%CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA: $3k → 10%CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA: $2k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%YWCA MISSOULA: $1k → 9%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $1k → 17%YWCA MISSOULA: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
PA
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
KS
AR
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 57 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

57 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
93

Total granted

$3.2M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+24%

Still filing today

68%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthInternationalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CENTRAL COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +7%
  • CP
    CREATIVE PROVIDERS FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $479k · revenue +7% · 50% of their budget
  • CA
    CHARLES AND KAREN FARVER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $160k · revenue +123% · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • W
    WESLEYLIFE
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +20%
  • CH
    Craig Hospital Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +35%
  • WS
    WONDER SPELEN
    one grant, 2019 · $80k · revenue -75% · 29% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Planned Parenthood North Central States Foundation

To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.

Human Services
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
4
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
7
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
8
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
9
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
10
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
11
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
12
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action and the most unlike its peers is Creative Providers Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity Food PantriesSenior Support ServicesLocal History MuseumsCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Animal Rescue and ShelterAffordable Housing Developm…Local Food System Organizat…Domestic Violence ServicesCancer Support ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Food Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 38. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number13%3%<5yr9%10%5–10yr14%21%10–20yr12%25%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr39%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value13%1%<5yr9%4%5–10yr14%12%10–20yr12%47%20–35yr14%8%35–55yr39%29%55yr+

The field is 13% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/122
the rest of the field
6%
1,704/29,083

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 171 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
111/113
Grantees still filing
74/113
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $1,362,200 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCCREATIVE PROVIDERS FOUNDATION — $479,200 · PhilanthropyCREATIVE PROVIDERS FOUNDATIONNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $194,600 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTCHARLES AND KAREN FARVER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $159,600 · PhilanthropyCHARLES AND KAREN FARVER CHARITABLE FOUNDAT…+7 more — $90,350 · PhilanthropyPELLA OPERA HOUSE — $247,000 · OtherPELLA OPERA HOUSEPRESIDIO GRADUATE SCHOOL — $194,600 · OtherPRESIDIO GRADUATE SCHOOLPELLA ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB — $100,000 · OtherPELLA ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUBUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $75,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $59,700 · OtherWONDER SPELEN — $80,000 · OtherPELLA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $70,000 · Other+102 more — $845,067 · Other+102 moreCENTRAL COLLEGE — $1,210,000 · EducationCENTRAL COLLEGE+5 more — $62,300 · EducationWESLEYLIFE — $250,000 · HealthCraig Hospital Foundation — $100,000 · HealthTHE WELL RESOURCE CENTER — $32,500 · HealthMULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES INC — $32,000 · Health+13 more — $41,321 · HealthCHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA — $62,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $23,000 · Human ServicesMONROE SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $16,000 · Human ServicesMURRAY CALLOWAY NEED LINE ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $5,000 · Human Services+11 more — $15,900 · Human ServicesPELLA COMMUNITY FOOD SHELF — $55,000 · Food & NutritionGETTYSBURG COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN — $15,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $15,000 · Food & NutritionMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC — $6,100 · Food & Nutrition+5 more — $5,000 · Food & NutritionSPRIGS N SPROUTS — $70,000 · ReligionHOUSE OF MISSIONS AND EQUIPPING — $15,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$2,285,950Other$1,671,367Education$1,272,300Health$455,821Human Services$138,900Food & Nutrition$96,100Religion$85,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $1,362,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL COLLEGE — $1,210,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCREATIVE PROVIDERS FOUNDATION — $479,200 over 8y, 50% of budgetWESLEYLIFE — $250,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetPRESIDIO GRADUATE SCHOOL — $194,600 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $194,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES AND KAREN FARVER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $159,600 over 7y, 100% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation — $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPELLA ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB — $100,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetWONDER SPELEN — $80,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetSPRIGS N SPROUTS — $70,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetPELLA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $70,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA — $62,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPELLA COMMUNITY FOOD SHELF — $55,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetSPIRIT OF PELLA — $50,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetCROSSROADS OF PELLA — $50,000 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetKICK IT FORWARD — $50,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetPELLA CHRISTIAN GRADE SCHOOL — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF PELLA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $39,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE WELL RESOURCE CENTER — $32,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES INC — $32,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKNOXVILLE HOSPITAL AND CLINICS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $23,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOME RESOURCE INC — $22,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetMONROE SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $16,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $16,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMT Alpha Cycling — $15,500 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $15,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPLEASANTVILLE YOUTH INITIATIVE — $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHOUSE OF MISSIONS AND EQUIPPING — $15,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPELLA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMURRAY CALLOWAY NEED LINE ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTOGETHER RISING — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGETTYSBURG HOSPITAL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE WRITERS WORKSHOP INC — $9,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetVISION TO LEARN — $8,821 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CONNECTION — $8,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFIVE VALLEYS LAND TRUST — $7,700 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC — $7,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC — $7,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $6,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC — $6,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBeanstalk Foundation — $5,300 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetPOVERELLO CENTER INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE PROVIDERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYLIFE ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDIO GRADUATE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES AND KAREN FARVER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PELLA ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB ↗
  • Who funds WONDER SPELEN ↗
  • Who funds SPRIGS N SPROUTS ↗
  • Who funds PELLA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds PELLA COMMUNITY FOOD SHELF ↗
  • Who funds SPIRIT OF PELLA ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS OF PELLA ↗
  • Who funds KICK IT FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds PELLA CHRISTIAN GRADE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF PELLA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds THE WELL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds KNOXVILLE HOSPITAL AND CLINICS ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOME RESOURCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MONROE SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MT Alpha Cycling ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds GETTYSBURG COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY OF CONCERN ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pella Rolscreen Found…Vermeer Charitable Fo…Weiler FoundationThe Denver FoundationVanden Bosch Foundati…Pella Community Found…R & L Vermeer Foundat…Prairie Meadows Race …Boat Foundation IncCommunity Fdn of Grea…Colorado Gives Founda…Rose Community Founda…
Pella Rolscreen FoundationIA47.3× affinity22 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Vermeer Charitable Foundation · Weiler Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Vanden Bosch Foundation · Pella Community Foundation · R & L Vermeer Foundation Inc · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · Boat Foundation Inc · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Colorado Gives Foundation · Rose Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Peter H and E Lucille Gaass Kuyper Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Upper Valley Haven — 38% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Peter H and E Lucille Gaass Kuyper Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Peter H and E Lucille Gaass Kuyper Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 171 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines