Skip to content
Peter E Haas Jr Family Fund at a glance

· Public charity

Peter E Haas Jr Family Fund

Mobilizing the power of community and the resources of philanthropy to advance equity for people, places and the planet.

$18M
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$3.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$14MPublic Benefit$12MHealth$8.3MEducation$7.4MRecreation & Sports$5.2MYouth Development$3.1MHuman Services$2.7MCrime & Legal$1.9MOther$0
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 51 grants below total $10,889,324, the rows itemized in this filing. The $18,197,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,307,676 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k37 grants · $4.0M
  • $250k+7 grants · $6.7M
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$609M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,765,760
STANFORD UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERS$860,160
PETALUMA RIVER PARK FOUNDATION INC$600,000
PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT$500,000
NOVATO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$358,250
SD FOUNDATION$350,000
SECURE FAMILIES COLLABORATIVE$300,000
RAIZES COLLECTIVE$235,000
YOUTH LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$191,489
10000 DEGREES$175,000
CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION SONOMA COUNTY$175,000
BOTANICAL BUS$150,000
NORTH BAY JOBS WITH JUSTICE$150,000
BECOMING INDEPENDENT$150,000
LEGAL AID OF SONOMA COUNTY$145,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAKE THE ROAD STATES INC: $200k → 20%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $35k → 10%Huckleberry Youth Programs Inc: $20k → 10%THE LIVING ROOM CENTER INC: $100k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM CENTER INC: $100k → 9%MARIN LINK INC: $20k → 8%THE LIVING ROOM: $100k → 9%Marin Link Inc: $15k → 8%THE LIVING ROOM CENTER INC: $100k → 9%TIDES CENTER: $160k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $80k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $80k → 10%SCOPA HAS A DREAM INC: $200k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $30k → 9%BECOMING INDEPENDENT: $250k → 9%BECOMING INDEPENDENT: $150k → 9%NORTH BAY CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $100k → 8%NORTH BAY CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $60k → 8%SECURE FAMILIES COLLABORATIVE: $300k → 9%SECURE FAMILIES COLLABORATIVE: $150k → 9%CAFE PUENTE: $125k → 8%SECURE FAMILIES COLLABORATIVE: $50k → 9%PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICE CENTER: $20k → 8%Center for Domestic Peace: $60k → 8%MAKE IT HOME: $50k → 8%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $50k → 8%MAKE IT HOME: $50k → 8%Center for Domestic Peace: $50k → 8%RITTER HOUSE: $45k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NV
CA
AZ
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Peter E Haas Jr Family Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Peter E Haas Jr Family Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$32M · 64 repeat orgs$6.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

64 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

64
38

Total granted

$32M
$4.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
0%

Still filing today

95%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    PETALUMA RIVER PARK FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $4.7M · revenue +535% · 73% of their budget
  • PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +102%
  • YL
    Youth Leadership Institute
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +231%

Funded once

  • ARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT
    one grant, 2024 · $700k · revenue 0%
  • NEO Philanthropy Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $650k · revenue 0%
  • DD
    DEFENDING DEMOCRACY TOGETHER INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2024 · $400k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
3
Santa Cruz Local Inc

Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.

—
4
Sf Partnership

SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…

—
5
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
6
Public Advocates Inc

For more than five decades, public advocates has challenged the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing,…

—
7
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
8
Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Silicon Valley Community Foundation (SVCF) connects people, ideas and resources to ensure equity and opportunity for all.

Philanthropy
9
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California

The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…

—
10
SFMade Inc

Our mission is to help manufacturers thrive, innovate, and create good jobs, for a more diverse and sustainable Bay Area.

Community Improvement
11
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
12
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voter Registration Project; the most unlike its peers is Early Vibes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
121/125
Grantees still filing
69/125
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $14,056,664 · PhilanthropyMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONSD Foundation: $1,050,000 · PhilanthropySD Foundation+8 more: $1,139,000 · Philanthropy+8 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $6,881,766 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEE…10000 DEGREES: $1,095,000 · Education10000 DEGREESCareer Technical Education Foundation Sonoma County: $600,000 · EducationCareer Technical Edu…Civic Nation: $450,000 · EducationDEFENDING DEMOCRACY TOGETHER INSTITUTE: $400,000 · Education+9 more: $1,370,000 · Education+9 moreNOVATO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $4,771,438 · OtherNOVATO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRI…Youth Leadership Institute: $1,829,838 · OtherYouth Leadership InstituteSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $600,000 · OtherLEGAL AID OF SONOMA COUNTY: $745,000 · OtherNEW VENTURE FUND: $600,000 · OtherNEO Philanthropy Inc: $650,000 · Other+57 more: $6,206,130 · Other+57 morePROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $2,200,000 · Civil RightsPROTECT DEMOCR…STATE VOICES: $1,500,000 · Civil RightsSTATE VOICESARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT: $700,000 · Civil RightsARIZONA CENTER…ONE ARIZONA: $350,000 · Civil RightsPROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC: $350,000 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $350,000 · Civil RightsVOTO LATINO FOUNDATION INC: $325,000 · Civil RightsThe Center for Election Innovation & Research: $300,000 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $275,000 · Civil Rights+8 more: $1,227,000 · Civil Rights+8 morePETALUMA RIVER PARK FOUNDATION INC: $4,733,000 · Recreation & SportsPETALUMA …Sonoma County Regional Parks Foundation: $245,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $925,000 · Human ServicesSECURE FAMILIES COLLABORATIVE: $500,000 · Human ServicesTHE LIVING ROOM CENTER: $400,000 · Human ServicesBecoming Independent: $400,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER: $320,000 · Human ServicesTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $250,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY: $230,000 · Human ServicesSCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $200,000 · Human ServicesMake The Road States Inc: $200,000 · Human ServicesCenter for Domestic Peace: $160,000 · Human ServicesNORTH BAY CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $160,000 · Human Services+9 more: $540,000 · Human ServicesNorth Marin Community Services: $1,330,290 · Youth Development+1 more: $20,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$16,245,664Education$10,796,766Other$15,402,406Civil Rights$7,577,000Recreation & Sports$5,078,000Human Services$4,285,000Youth Development$1,350,290

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $14,056,664 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $6,881,766 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPETALUMA RIVER PARK FOUNDATION INC: $4,733,000 over 5y, 73% of budgetPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $2,200,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetYouth Leadership Institute: $1,829,838 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetSTATE VOICES: $1,500,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetNorth Marin Community Services: $1,330,290 over 8y, 7.5% of budget10000 DEGREES: $1,095,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetSD Foundation: $1,050,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $925,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetLEGAL AID OF SONOMA COUNTY: $745,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT: $700,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $650,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $600,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $600,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCareer Technical Education Foundation Sonoma County: $600,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetSECURE FAMILIES COLLABORATIVE: $500,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetCivic Nation: $450,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE: $420,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetTHE LIVING ROOM CENTER: $400,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetBecoming Independent: $400,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetDEFENDING DEMOCRACY TOGETHER INSTITUTE: $400,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetONE ARIZONA: $350,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetPROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC: $350,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $350,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetVOTO LATINO FOUNDATION INC: $325,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetSANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $325,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $320,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRaizes Collective: $310,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetGoodnation Foundation Inc: $300,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetThe Center for Election Innovation & Research: $300,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetCONSERVATION CORPS NORTH BAY INC: $300,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $275,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNorth Bay Jobs With Justice: $252,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SONOMA-MARIN: $250,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAmerica Votes Education Fund: $250,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT: $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $250,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SAN FRANCISCO: $250,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetRED TAB FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetSonoma County Library Foundation: $250,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetSonoma County Regional Parks Foundation: $245,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY: $230,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA: $200,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetALL VOTING IS LOCAL: $200,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetIMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA: $200,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetLATINO SERVICE PROVIDERS: $200,000 over 2y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community Found…Sonoma County Communi…McNabb FoundationThe San Francisco Fou…Leonard & Beryl Buck …Bothin FoundationKaiser Foundation Hos…Sonoma County Vintner…Jewish Community Fede…Tipping Point Communi…Redwood Credit Union …East Bay Community Fo…
Marin Community FoundationCA90.4× affinity61 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Sonoma County Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Tipping Point Community · Redwood Credit Union Community Fund Inc · East Bay Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peter E Haas Jr Family Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peter E Haas Jr Family Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 129 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peter E Haas Jr Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home