· Private foundation
Peter C Dozzi Family Foundation Aka Eugene Dozzi Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of PETER C DOZZI FAMILY FOUNDATION AKA EUGENE DOZZI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k78 grants · $150k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| DUQUENSE UNIVERSITY | $30,000 |
| BRADDOCK CARNEGIE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| PITTSBURGH MUSICAL THATRE | $9,310 |
| CHATHAM UNIVERSITY | $9,000 |
| GREEN BUILDING ALLIANCE | $5,080 |
| BLOOMFIELD GARFIELD CORPORATION | $5,000 |
| CHRONS & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $5,000 |
| CHRONS & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $5,000 |
| ADAGIO HEALTH | $5,000 |
| CENTER OF LIFE | $5,000 |
| PITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE | $5,000 |
| PITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE | $4,594 |
| CONTEMPORARY CRAFT | $4,400 |
| NATIONAL AVIARY | $4,291 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $138k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
109 repeat relationships — 59 still active in FY2025, 50 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCarnegie Mellon University8× · 2017–2025 · $402k · revenue +15%
- DUDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT8× · 2017–2024 · $294k · revenue +29%
- PBPITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $139k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- PPPITTSBURGH PENGUINS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -11%
- RMROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +5%
- LRLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +136%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.
The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…
An employer-led coalition that champions outcomes-based, cost-effective healthcare through education, market expertise, group purchasing, comparative data and decision support.
We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…
The pittsburgh venture capital association was founded in 1982 to catalyze venture investment and entrepreneurialism in western pennsylvania. since then it has become the leading voice of private equity investors in the region.through a…
To create a vibrant, responsible, and sustainable film and digital media sector in southwestern pennsylvania.
See schedule othe allegheny conference on community development (accd) and affiliates - the greater pittsburgh chamber of commerce (chamber), the pennsylvania economy league of greater pittsburgh(pelgp) and the pittsburgh regional alliance…
To provide health empowerment services to injection drug users and prevent the spread of hiv.
The organization advocates with, empowers, and supports people with disabilities and their families throughout their lives.
Provide information to decision maker in the pittsburgh region to promote economic prosperity, social equity, and environmental quality for sustainable solutions for communities and businesses.
To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Pittsburgh Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 201 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
- Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH MUSICAL THEATER ↗
- Who funds SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE SOCIETY FOR ART IN CRAFTS ↗
- Who funds GENEVA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GREEN BUILDING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds RIVERLIFE ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF LIFE ↗
- Who funds ADAGIO HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL AVIARY IN PITTSBURGH INC ↗
- Who funds PHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds INVISION HUMAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds ALS Association Western Pennsylvania Chapter ↗
- Who funds FAMILYLINKS INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRADLEY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE WALDORF SCHOOL OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds INVISION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VINTAGE INC ↗
- Who funds ALUMNI THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CARRIAGE HOUSE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PITTSBURGH URBAN FOREST ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds THE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds UNION PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Heinz Endowments · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Grable Foundation · McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na · Eqt Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Upmc Group · The Fine Foundation · McElhattan Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Peter C Dozzi Family Foundation Aka Eugene Dozzi Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Peter C Dozzi Family Foundation Aka Eugene Dozzi Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Peter C Dozzi Family Foundation Aka Eugene Dozzi Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.