· Public charity
Pete & Arline Harman Trust Fund
Provides support to churches, educational institutions other charitable programs that assist people, especially young people, to make a difference to society.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k17 grants · $545k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $745k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LDS PHILANTHROPIES | $1,190,000 |
| INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION (DBA PRIMARY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDA | $125,000 |
| CENTER FOR STUDENT ACCESS & RESOURCES | $100,000 |
| Lucille Packard Children's Hospital | $100,000 |
| Leukemia & Lymphoma Society | $100,000 |
| KQED | $100,000 |
| BEREA COLLEGE | $60,000 |
| WEST VALLEY CITY | $60,000 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $50,000 |
| Mali Rising Foundation | $50,000 |
| BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY | $45,000 |
| ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION | $45,000 |
| WEST VALLEY ARTS AND CULTURAL FOUNDATION | $45,000 |
| Sacramento Food Bank | $40,000 |
| Food Lifeline | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $380k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
35 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC7× · 2017–2025 · $390k · revenue +4%
BEREA COLLEGE8× · 2017–2025 · $390k · revenue +50%- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches8× · 2017–2025 · $350k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- IHINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION (DBA PRIMARY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDAone grant, 2023 · $100k
- COCHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSone grant, 2018 · $100k
- LLLeukemia & Lymphoma Societyone grant, 2022 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
The mission of scouting america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. (continued on schedule o)programs of scouting america and grand…
Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
To instill in young people; values, develop leadership skills, and ethical character as expressed in the scout oath and law.
The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…
We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as caring, responsible, productive citizens.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula and the most unlike its peers is West Valley Arts Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KQED INC ↗
- Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds MALI RISING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA ↗
- Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SALT LAKE ↗
- Who funds BLACK GIRLS CODE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds West Valley Arts Foundation ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds Intermountain Therapy Animals ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Utah · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pete & Arline Harman Trust Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.