Skip to content

· Public charity

Pete & Arline Harman Trust Fund

Provides support to churches, educational institutions other charitable programs that assist people, especially young people, to make a difference to society.

$2.5M
Granted FY2026still arriving
26
Grants FY2026still arriving
7
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$6.2MHealth$2.1MPhilanthropy$1.2MFood & Nutrition$845kArts & Culture$795kPublic Benefit$440kYouth Development$375kHuman Services$375kOther$0
02FY2026 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $490k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $745k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$45,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY$1,055,000
BYU - IDAHO$250,000
INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION (PRIMARY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$125,000
CENTER FOR STUDENT ACCESS & RESOURCES$100,000
Leukemia & Lymphoma Society$100,000
LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION$100,000
KQED$100,000
WEST VALLEY CITY$60,000
BEREA COLLEGE$60,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$50,000
Mali Rising Foundation$50,000
WEST VALLEY ARTS AND CULTURAL FOUNDATION$45,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$45,000
GLIDE FOUNDATION$40,000
Sacramento Food Bank$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $450k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Guide Dogs For The Blind Inc: $20k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 13%American Red Cross-California Gold Country Region: $10k → 18%Guide Dogs for the Blind: $15k → 13%American Red Cross: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF THE COLORADO AND WYOMING REGION: $10k → 12%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $20k → 8%Guide Dogs for the Blind: $5k → 13%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $20k → 8%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $20k → 8%Guide Dogs for the Blind: $15k → 8%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $10k → 8%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $50k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 8%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $50k → 8%American Red Cross - Palo Alto Chapter: $10k → 8%Intermountain Therapy Animals: $10k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS-PALO ALTO CHAPTER: $10k → 8%American Red Cross-Palo Alto Region: $10k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $20k → 8%Intermountain Therapy Animals: $10k → 8%American Red Cross - Palo Alto Chapter: $10k → 8%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 8%American Red Cross Utah Region: $15k → 8%American Red Cross of Utah: $10k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF UTAH: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
MI
NY
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 38 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2026, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
13

Total granted

$14M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+79%

Still filing today

74%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25’26
Youth DevelopmentHealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    8× · 2017–2026 · $490k · revenue +4%
  • BEREA COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2026 · $450k · revenue +50%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    9× · 2017–2026 · $400k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
    one grant, 2025 · $1.2M
  • IH
    INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION (DBA PRIMARY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDA
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • CO
    CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girl Scouts of Utah

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
2
Grand Canyon Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

The mission of scouting america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. (continued on schedule o)programs of scouting america and grand…

—
3
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
5
Girl Scouts of Western Washington

Girl scouting builds girls* of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
6
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
7
Bay-Lakes Council #635 Boy Scouts of America

To instill in young people; values, develop leadership skills, and ethical character as expressed in the scout oath and law.

Youth Development
8
Beta Gamma Sigma Inc

The mission of the international honor society beta gamma sigma is to honor student excellence in business education, develop forward-thinking business leaders, and foster a global community to be catalysts for good.

Education
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
Boys and Girls Club of Santa Monica Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as caring, responsible, productive citizens.

Youth Development
11
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
12
Boy Scouts of America Sagamore Council 162

The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula; the most unlike its peers is West Valley Arts Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
26/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $5,430,000 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITYTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $1,190,000 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-IDAHO: $925,000 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-IDAHOUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $685,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHPRIMARY CHILDREN'S CANCER: $575,000 · OtherWEST VALLEY CITY: $500,000 · Other+20 more: $1,640,000 · Other+20 moreLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $695,000 · HealthLUCILE PACK…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $490,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCE…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $285,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S…INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · HealthINTERMOUNTA…+1 more: $20,000 · HealthBEREA COLLEGE: $450,000 · EducationMALI RISING FOUNDATION: $415,000 · EducationBLACK GIRLS CODE INC: $70,000 · EducationKENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Education+2 more: $44,238 · EducationKQED INC: $850,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $400,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesIntermountain Therapy Animals: $40,000 · Human ServicesFreedom Guide Dogs for the Blind Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $230,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD LIFELINE: $160,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $160,000 · Food & NutritionBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $205,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SACRAMENTO INC: $20,000 · Youth Development+3 more: $15,000 · Youth Development
Other$10,945,000Health$1,615,000Education$1,029,238Arts & Culture$850,000Human Services$585,000Food & Nutrition$550,000Youth Development$315,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKQED INC: $850,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $695,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $490,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $450,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMALI RISING FOUNDATION: $415,000 over 9y, 29% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $400,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $285,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $230,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGLIDE FOUNDATION: $225,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $205,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $160,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $160,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $160,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES: $160,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $125,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SALT LAKE: $100,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY: $70,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetBLACK GIRLS CODE INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetKENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIntermountain Therapy Animals: $40,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $34,238 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTANFORD HEALTH CARE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFreedom Guide Dogs for the Blind Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SACRAMENTO INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MALI RISING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SALT LAKE ↗
  • Who funds West Valley Arts Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds BLACK GIRLS CODE INC ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OAKLAND ↗
  • Who funds Intermountain Therapy Animals ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of UtahUT13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Utah · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pete & Arline Harman Trust Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pete & Arline Harman Trust Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pete & Arline Harman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph