Skip to content
Permian Basin Youth Chavarim Fka Permian Basin Bnai Brith Youth Organ at a glance

· Public charity

Permian Basin Youth Chavarim Fka Permian Basin Bnai Brith Youth Organ

To help youth in their personal development

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$239kYouth Development$80kEducation$65kRecreation & Sports$51kHealth$44kHuman Services$39kInternational$36kReligion$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $38,439, the rows itemized in this filing. The $78,694 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $40,255 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$280k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREENE FAMILY CAMP$19,625
CASSATT IN THE BASIN$10,000
TEMPLE BETH EL$8,814
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FRIENDS OF THE ISRAELI DEFENSE FORCES (FIDF): $18k → 17%TMA FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%JORDAN ELIZABETH HARRIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%GEMELLES CHESED: $35k → 12%MARC: $14k → 14%GREENE FAMILY CAMP: $20k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA & MIDLAND: $30k → 16%GOLDBERG MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $10k → 16%FRIENDS OF THE ISRAELI DEFENSE FORCES (FIDF): $12k → 17%TMA FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $10k → 12%MARC: $9k → 14%GREENE FAMILY CAMP: $13k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA & MIDLAND: $20k → 16%UOS GOLDBERG MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $6k → 16%HASBARA SCHOOL: $8k → 17%TMA FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%BASIN PBS: $15k → 12%SPECTRUM OF SOLUTIONS: $9k → 14%GREENE FAMILY CAMP: $13k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA & MIDLAND: $20k → 16%GEMELLES CHESED: $10k → 12%MARC: $8k → 14%UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM GREEN FAMILY CAMP: $8k → 16%TEMPLE BETH EL: $15k → 16%MIDLAND RAPE CRISIS & CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $6k → 12%UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM GREEN FAMILY CAMP: $6k → 16%TEMPEL BETH EL: $10k → 16%JMDR: $10k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA & MIDLAND: $10k → 16%YMCA: $5k → 12%ECTOR COUNTY CHILDREN'S SVCS BOARD: $10k → 16%WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $5k → 12%TEMPLE BETH EL: $9k → 16%TEMPLE BETH EL: $6k → 16%BYNUM SCHOOL: $6k → 12%CASSATT IN THE BASIN: $29k → 16%CASSATT IN THE BASIN: $24k → 16%CASSATT IN THE BASIN: $20k → 16%CASSATT IN THE BASIN: $19k → 16%ECTOR COUNTY CHILD SERVICES BOARD: $15k → 16%CASSATT IN THE BASIN: $15k → 16%CASSATT IN THE BASIN: $13k → 16%UTPB MUSIC DEPARTMENT: $10k → 16%CASSATT IN THE BASIN: $10k → 16%ECTOR COUNTY CHILD SERVICES BOARD: $10k → 16%CASSATT IN THE BASIN: $10k → 16%YMCA: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$766k · 19 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
11

Total granted

$766k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+45%

Still filing today

42%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    MARC INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $39k · revenue +20%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    3× · 2017–2021 · $36k · revenue +53%
  • WT
    WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK
    3× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • J
    JMDR
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • F2
    FOOD 2 KIDS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • EC
    ECTOR COUNTY CHILDRENS SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys and Girls Club of Midland Inc

To inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
2
Permian Basin Rehabilitation Center

Improving lives by providing exceptional and compassionate therapy services.

Health
3
Boys and Girls Clubs of the Permian Basin Inc

To inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
4
Greater Opportunities of the Permian Basin Inc

To provide a positive learning experience in a safe and healthy environment that will improve the quality of life for the children, service, and empower them to become self-sufficient, contributing members of the community.

Human Services
5
The Westview School Inc

The Westview School provides a unique, specialized, and nurturing learning environment that offers outstanding educational and social opportunities for children on the autism spectrum.

Education
6
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
7
Bush Tennis Center

The mission of the Center is to give everyone the opportunity to experience the game of tennis regardless of physical, financial or geographical barriers.

—
8
Permian Basin Behavioral Health Center

Pbbhc's mission is to provide high-quality behavioral health services that are accessible to all residents of permian basin region of west texas and southeastern new mexico.

Health
9
Panhandle Behavioral Services Inc
Health
10
Samaritan Center Inc

Providing mental healthcare to restore hope and healing

Human Services
11
Midland Festival Ballet

Midland festival ballet is a 501(c)3 nonprofit whose mission is to promote and present the art of classical ballet through education, performance, and outreach.

Arts & Culture
12
Midland-Odessa Symphony & Chorale Inc

To enhance the quality of life in West Texas through professional music performances and music education.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Odessa; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Israel Defense Forces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM: $63,982 · OtherUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISMIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE BETH EL OF ODESSA TEXAS: $40,064 · OtherTEMPLE BETH EL OF ODESSA TEXASMARC INC: $38,924 · OtherMARC INCTMA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherECTOR COUNTY CHILD SERVICES BOARD: $25,000 · OtherHASBARA SCHOOL: $24,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherJCRS: $21,000 · OtherMISC DONATIONS & GRANTS 5000: $20,699 · OtherWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $20,000 · Other+11 more: $77,154 · Other+11 moreCASSATT IN THE BASIN: $138,000 · Public BenefitCASSATT IN THE BAS…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA: $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIR…PERMIAN BASIN PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $36,000 · InternationalGOLDBERG MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $16,000 · EducationBYNUM SCHOOL: $15,005 · EducationJordan Elizabeth Harris Foundation: $5,000 · Health
Other$491,823Public Benefit$138,000Youth Development$80,000Arts & Culture$55,000International$36,000Education$31,005Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASSATT IN THE BASIN: $138,000 over 8y, 55% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA: $80,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC: $55,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMARC INC: $38,924 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGOLDBERG MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $16,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL: $15,005 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMidland Rape Crisis Center Inc: $5,630 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJordan Elizabeth Harris Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASSATT IN THE BASIN ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds MARC INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds GOLDBERG MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FOOD 2 KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Midland Rape Crisis Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jordan Elizabeth Harris Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Helen Greathouse Char…Scharbauer Foundation…Abell-Hanger Foundati…Permian Basin Area Fo…Paul and Katherine Mo…Bryant Family Foundat…Fmh FoundationThe Henry FoundationWayne & Jo Ann Moore …Ken W Davis FoundationRea Charitable TrustNational Philanthropi…
Helen Greathouse Charitable TrustMO17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation · Bryant Family Foundation · Fmh Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Ken W Davis Foundation · Rea Charitable Trust · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Permian Basin Youth Chavarim Fka Permian Basin Bnai Brith Youth Organ funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Permian Basin Youth Chavarim Fka Permian Basin Bnai Brith Youth Organ. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Permian Basin Youth Chavarim Fka Permian Basin Bnai Brith Youth Organ?

    Find your warmest path to Permian Basin Youth Chavarim Fka Permian Basin Bnai Brith Youth Organ through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Permian Basin Youth Chavarim Fka Permian Basin Bnai Brith Youth Organ’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home