Skip to content

· Private foundation

Perciak Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$34kHealth$24kEducation$16kCommunity Improvement$9kPhilanthropy$6kInternational$4kCivil Rights$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$51k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Barbara Church$4,257
Strongsville Chamber Foundation$1,300
Catholic Community Foundation$1,250
St John Neuman Catholic Church$1,250
Strongsville Educational Foundation$1,000
Cornerstone of Hope$1,000
Southwest Community Health Foundation$500
Hands Together$500
Strongsville City Club$500
Polish American Congress$250
St Joseph Catholic Church$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Catholic Charities: $600 → 17%Catholic Charities: $300 → 17%Fund to Aid Ukraine: $1k → 17%Cornerstone of Hope: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$74k · 14 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
22

Total granted

$74k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+37%

Still filing today

21%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureReligionInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Southwest Community Health Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +28%
  • SB
    St Barbara Church
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k
  • SJ
    St John Neuman Catholic Church
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k

Funded once

  • CC
    Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • SJ
    STS JOSEPH & JOHN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • FT
    FUND TO AID UKRAINE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -77%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Scholarship Granting Organization of the Catholic Community Foundation

The angel scholarship fund (asf) serves as the scholarship granting organization of the catholic community foundation. its mission is to promote the state of ohio scholarship tax credit program with all who support catholic education in…

—
2
The Foundation of the Catholic Diocese of Columbus

Support of religious, educational, and charitable activities in furtherance of the catholic church and catholic diocese of columbus.

Religion
3
Catholic Community Connection

Catholic Community Connection, an organization of Catholic sponsored education, healthcare, human services and senior living ministries, fosters collaboration to respond to the needs of all people within the Diocese of Cleveland.

—
4
The Greater Cincinnati Foundation

As a trusted and connected partner, we inspire generous people to invest in a more equitable and vibrant region now and for generations to come.

Philanthropy
5
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
6
Sisters of Charity Foundation of Cleveland

A ministry of the Sisters of Charity of St Augustine, the Sisters of Charity Foundation of Cleveland (SCFC) works to improve the lives of those most in need with special attention to families and children living in poverty. We strive to…

Religion
7
Columbus Medical Association Foundation

The columbus medical association foundation, through the governance and oversight of its board of physicians and other experts, effects change within specific priority areas to improve the health and wellbeing of the residents and…

Health
8
The Cleveland Foundation

Enhance the lives of all residents of greater cleveland, now and for generations to come, by working together with our donors to build community endowment, address needs through grantmaking, and provide leadership on key community issues.

Philanthropy
9
Diocese of Cleveland Facilities Services Corporation

To provide leadership and expertise in the planning, construction management, construction financing, maintenance and renovation of the buildings in which the charitable activities of catholic charities corporation occur.

—
10
Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio

Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio serves and empowers people through God's love in their times of vulnerability. We do so through a full range of local services that engage the community in building solidarity.

Human Services
11
Catholic Social Services Inc

Motivated by faith, catholic social services helps poor and vulnerable seniors and families reach their potential.

Human Services
12
Catholic Community Foundation - Ohio

The catholic community foundation - ohio holds, invests, and distributes third party gifts to benefit roman catholics and others living within the diocese of toledo's geographic area to enrich lives in the name of christ through inspired…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Fund to Aid Ukraine Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Barbara Church: $11,857 · OtherSt Barbara ChurchSt John Neuman Catholic Church: $8,450 · OtherSt John Neuman Catholic ChurchCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,575 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCleveland Clinic Foundation: $5,000 · OtherCleveland Clinic FoundationStrongsville Chamber Foundation: $4,800 · OtherStrongsville Chamber FoundationST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH: $4,700 · OtherST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCHStrongsville Schools Foundation: $4,500 · OtherStrongsville Schools FoundationBENEDICTINE HIGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $4,500 · OtherBENEDICTINE HIGH SCHOOL INCORPORATEDCity of Strongsville: $4,450 · OtherCity of StrongsvilleBENEDICTINE ORDER OF CLEVELAND: $4,000 · OtherST JOHN NEUMAN CHURCH: $3,200 · OtherStrongsville City Club: $3,000 · Other+18 more: $11,600 · Other+18 moreSouthwest Community Health Foundation: $18,983 · HealthSouthwest Community H…+1 more: $500 · HealthFUND TO AID UKRAINE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $900 · Human ServicesHands Together Inc: $2,000 · InternationalARTS IN STRONGSVILLE: $1,000 · Arts & CultureHOME OF THE MOTHER INC: $500 · ReligionPARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $200 · Philanthropy
Other$75,632Health$19,483Human Services$2,900International$2,000Arts & Culture$1,000Religion$500Philanthropy$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouthwest Community Health Foundation: $18,983 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,575 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetStrongsville Schools Foundation: $4,500 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetHands Together Inc: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFUND TO AID UKRAINE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetConservative Agenda for America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTS IN STRONGSVILLE: $1,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOME OF THE MOTHER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREEL RECOVERY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPTA OHIO CONGRESS: $300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ALTENHEIM FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southwest Community Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Strongsville Schools Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Hands Together Inc ↗
  • Who funds FUND TO AID UKRAINE INC ↗
  • Who funds Conservative Agenda for America ↗
  • Who funds ARTS IN STRONGSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HOME OF THE MOTHER INC ↗
  • Who funds REEL RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds PTA OHIO CONGRESS ↗
  • Who funds THE ALTENHEIM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · Columbus Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Perciak Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Perciak Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Perciak Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Perciak Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Perciak Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph