Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pema Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
50
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$4.3M
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$6.5MEducation$3.5MRecreation & Sports$3.3MSocial Science$2.7MHealth$780kPublic Safety & Disaster$725kHuman Services$707kPublic Benefit$572kOther$0
02FY2024 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $336k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $825k
  • $250k+4 grants · $5.3M
$10,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION$4,250,000
NATIONAL WESTERN STOCK SHOW$532,600
AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE$256,000
ST JOHN VIANNEY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$250,000
SOPHIA INSTITUTE$150,000
ACE SCHOLARSHIPS$124,250
DUCKS UNLIMITED$120,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$112,500
ENDOW$100,000
MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER$68,000
NATIONAL CATHOLIC BIOETHICS CENTER$50,000
FAMILY FOR FAMILIES$50,000
ARCHBISHOP'S CATHOLIC APPEAL$50,000
DENVER ART MUSEUM$30,000
STEAMBOAT INSTITUTE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $397k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE COMMIT FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $3k → 5%MERCY CHEFS: $5k → 20%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $2k → 5%SHADOW WARRIORS PROJECT: $50k → 9%SHADOW WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 9%SHADOW WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 9%SHADOW WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 9%SHADOW WARRIORS PROJECT: $5k → 9%SHADOW WARRIORS PROJECT: $5k → 9%NATIONAL CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME: $25k → 14%FAMILY FOR FAMILIES: $100k → 7%FAMILY FOR FAMILIES: $50k → 7%FAMILY FOR FAMILIES: $5k → 7%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 12%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 12%DENVER POLICE FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%DENVER POLICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%DENVER POLICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%DENVER POLICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%DENVER POLICE FOUNDATION: $6k → 12%DENVER POLICE FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%DENVER POLICE FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%DENVER POLICE FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%THE CHOSEN AND DEARLY LOVED FOUNDATION: $20k → 12%THE CHOSEN AND DEARLY LOVED FOUNDATION: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 106 repeat orgs$990k to everyone else

106 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2024, 68 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

106
94

Total granted

$20M
$848k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+32%

Still filing today

57%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $143k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +116%
  • AE
    AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +0%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +194%

Funded once

  • NT
    NATIONAL TAX LIBERATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • FB
    FIGHT BACK FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +13%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
3
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
4
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
7
Colorado Bar Association

To advance the science of jurisprudence, secure the more efficient administration of justice, encourage the adoption of proper legislation, advocate thorough and continuing legal education, uphold the honor and integrity of the bar,…

—
8
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gold Crown Foundation; the most unlike its peers is CO2 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

127 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 127 of the 217 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
28
Early backer (in before they grew)
123/127
Grantees still filing
87/127
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION: $4,410,000 · OtherTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATIONST JOHN VIANNEY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $525,000 · OtherST JOHN PAUL THE GREAT CATHOLIC HS: $500,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $380,000 · Other+141 more: $4,971,670 · Other+141 moreTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION: $3,223,454 · Recreation & SportsTHE WESTERN STOCK…+3 more: $10,500 · Recreation & SportsALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $1,642,750 · EducationALLIANCE FOR C…Augustine Institute Inc: $435,000 · EducationAugustine Inst…Cornell University: $201,500 · EducationCornell Univer…THE STEAMBOAT INSTITUTE: $96,000 · Education+20 more: $335,250 · Education+20 moreAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $1,885,000 · Social ScienceAMERICAN ENTER…ENDOW: $729,000 · Social ScienceENDOW+1 more: $80,000 · Social ScienceDENVER ART MUSEUM: $128,419 · Arts & CultureLION GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $99,800 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $97,500 · Arts & CultureMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $68,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $46,150 · Arts & CultureFAMILY FOR FAMILIES: $155,000 · Human ServicesSWP INC dba SHADOW WARRIORS: $90,000 · Human ServicesDENVER POLICE FOUNDATION: $65,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHOSEN & DEARLY LOVED FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME INC: $25,000 · Human Services+4 more: $27,500 · Human ServicesSOPHIA INSTITUTE: $245,000 · ReligionWINDOWS TO THE DIVINE: $48,000 · ReligionTHE NAPA INSTITUTE: $29,800 · Religion+2 more: $11,443 · Religion
Other$10,786,670Recreation & Sports$3,233,954Education$2,710,500Social Science$2,694,000Arts & Culture$464,869Human Services$403,000Religion$334,243

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION: $3,223,454 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $1,885,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $1,642,750 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetENDOW: $729,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetAugustine Institute Inc: $435,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetSOPHIA INSTITUTE: $245,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCornell University: $201,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONVENTION OF STATES ACTION: $170,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY FOR FAMILIES: $155,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $128,419 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $103,960 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER COLORADO COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $103,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLION GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $99,800 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $97,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STEAMBOAT INSTITUTE: $96,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN HYPERBARIC ASSOC FOR BRAIN INJURIES: $90,000 over 7y, 32% of budgetSWP INC dba SHADOW WARRIORS: $90,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON SENSE INSTITUTE: $80,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $68,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDENVER POLICE FOUNDATION: $65,500 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetINDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE: $64,250 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetACM LIFTING LIVES: $60,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetGOLD CROWN FOUNDATION: $56,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFIGHT BACK FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWINDOWS TO THE DIVINE: $48,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetStep Denver: $45,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHOSEN & DEARLY LOVED FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO LONGITUDINAL STUDY: $30,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetREGIS UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NAPA INSTITUTE: $29,800 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $25,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Succeeds: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $22,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChemical Marketing & Economics Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetTHE BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDENVER RUSTLERS INC: $18,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $15,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO OUTREACH EXCHANGE: $15,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds ENDOW ↗
  • Who funds Augustine Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOPHIA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds CONVENTION OF STATES ACTION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY FOR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER COLORADO COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds LION GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STEAMBOAT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN HYPERBARIC ASSOC FOR BRAIN INJURIES ↗
  • Who funds SWP INC dba SHADOW WARRIORS ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds COMMON SENSE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO36.5× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Daniels Fund · Rose Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Catholic Foundation No Colorado · Adolph Coors Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Richmond American Foundation · The Martin Family Foundation · Bruce Benson Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pema Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pema Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • National Center for Victims of Crime Inc: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pema Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Pema Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 217 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pema’s filings →

More from the funding graph