Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Payton's Lemonade Stand

To empower the next generation of philanthropists by harnessing the power of kids serving kids.

$800k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Health$39kHousing & Shelter$21kHuman Services$7kEducation$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kYouth Development$3kPhilanthropy$1kFood & Nutrition$250
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $27,661 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $800,191 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $772,530 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$1,355
Median grant
2
States reached
$163k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UpSpring$8,770
Ronald McDonald House$6,520
Cincinnati Public Schools$4,833
Rising Stars of America$2,500
Bethany House$1,355
Aubrey Rose Foundation$1,254
Queen City Book Bank$1,250
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center$579
Madi's House$350
Master Provisions$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Ronald McDonald House: $7k → 16%Ronald McDonald House: $6k → 16%Ronald McDonald House: $6k → 16%Ronald McDonald House: $6k → 16%BDK Fund: $444 → 16%Hope's Closet: $1k → 16%Hope's Closet: $500 → 16%A Kid Again: $4k → 16%A Kid Again: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$64k · 7 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$64k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+3%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER CINCINNATI INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $23k · revenue +55%
  • U
    UPSPRING
    3× · 2022–2025 · $19k · revenue +22%
  • MH
    Madis House Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • M2
    Matthew 25 Ministries Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -24%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue +78%
  • MT
    MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope for Cleveland's Children
2
Methodist Children's Home

Methodist children's home equips children, youth, and families to flourish by offering hope through christian-centered relationships, services, and support.

Human Services
3
Choices for Victims of Domestic Violence

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Human Services
4
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion
5
Indiana United Methodist Children's Home Inc

To meet the special needs of each child and family served in order to help improve their quality of life. the board of trustees and staff members of the home are committed to bringing the highest quality resources available to the…

Human Services
6
United Methodist Ministry With Children and Families Inc

Methodist childrens homes seeks to bring restoration to children and youth who have been neglected or abused. by the end of their time with us, we hope to see that they find reconciliation with their biological families, love within an…

Human Services
7
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…

Human Services
8
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
9
Mercy Life Center Corporation

We, pittsburgh mercy health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy life center is a member of pittsburgh mercy health system…

Health
10
Children's Restoration Network

Our mission is to offer hope and support, enabling children and their mothers to break the cycle of homelessness by empowering them to become part of mainstream society as active, productive citizens through programs and special events…

Human Services
11
Central New York Ronald McDonald House

Housing and programs for sick children and thier families.

12
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Central Indiana Inc

To provide a supportive home-away-from-home for families of children receiving medical care at riley children's health and other area hospitals.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lighthouse Youth Services and the most unlike its peers is The Mary Magdalen Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%3%<5yr14%13%5–10yr18%17%10–20yr17%33%20–35yr15%23%35–55yr15%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%12%5–10yr18%6%10–20yr17%41%20–35yr15%40%35–55yr15%2%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
13%
721/5,471

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER CINCINNATI INC — $23,160 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATE…A KID AGAIN INC — $5,035 · Human ServicesA KID AGAIN INCHOPE'S CLOSET INC — $1,500 · Human Services+1 more — $444 · Human ServicesUPSPRING — $19,295 · Youth DevelopmentUPSPRINGMadis House Inc — $8,889 · HealthMadis House IncCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $4,329 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL …SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $1,500 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS F…+1 more — $250 · HealthCincinnati City School District — $4,833 · OtherCincinnati Ci…RISING STARS OF AMERICA — $2,500 · OtherRISING STARS …LITERACY NETWORK OF GREATER CINCINNATI DBA QUEEN CITY BOOK BANK — $2,110 · OtherLITERACY NETW…+1 more — $250 · OtherMatthew 25 Ministries Inc — $5,000 · InternationalBethany House Services Inc — $1,355 · Housing & ShelterAUBREY ROSE FOUNDATION — $1,254 · EducationMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$30,139Youth Development$19,295Health$14,968Other$9,693International$5,000Housing & Shelter$1,355Education$1,254Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER CINCINNATI INC — $23,160 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUPSPRING — $19,295 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMadis House Inc — $8,889 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetA KID AGAIN INC — $5,035 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $4,329 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY NETWORK OF GREATER CINCINNATI DBA QUEEN CITY BOOK BANK — $2,110 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE'S CLOSET INC — $1,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAUBREY ROSE FOUNDATION — $1,254 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BDK FUND — $444 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CURE STARTS NOW INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH33× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Matthew 25 Ministries Inc · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Josephine S Russell Charitable · Millstone Fund · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Interact for Health · The Scripps Howard Foundation · The James J and Joan a Gardner Family Foundation · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Payton's Lemonade Stand funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Payton's Lemonade Stand?

Find your warmest path to Payton's Lemonade Stand through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph