Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Matthew 25 Ministries Inc

The mission of Matthew 25: Ministries is to provide nutritional food to the hungry, clean water to the thirsty, clothing to the naked, affordable shelter to the homeless, medical care to the ill, and humanitarian supplies to those in need.

$295M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

International$445kEducation$41kFood & Nutrition$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$6k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $70,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $295,207,972 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $295,137,972 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$125M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The James Clinic$50,000
Foster Church$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Bread of Life Inc: $100k → 16%Sycamore Bridges: $10k → 16%Sycamore Bridges: $10k → 16%Neighborhood Bridges: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $89M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$48M · 54% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

Russia and Neighboring States$35M · 39% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

South America$4.0M · 4% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

Middle East and North Africa$1.0M · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$693k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

South Asia$374k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

24%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$121k · 3 repeat orgs$378k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +355% since the first grant, against +109% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
16

Total granted

$121k
$308k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+355%
+109%

Still filing today

33%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’24
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalReligionFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BETH-EL FARM WORKER MINISTRY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $65k
  • NB
    NEIGHBORHOOD BRIDGES
    3× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +355%
  • WH
    WALNUT HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $26k

Funded once

  • BO
    BREAD OF LIFE INCgraduated
    7× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +126%
  • M
    MIRACLEFEETgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue +151%
  • WH
    WALNUT HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

2
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
3
Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
4
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
5
Mount Carmel Health System

We, mount carmel health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mount carmel health system is a member of trinity health.

6
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
7
Ncr At Home Health and Wellness

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

8
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
9
National Church Residences At Home Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

10
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
11
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

12
The Healthcare Connection Inc

To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is 10 Star Trend Setters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Food Banks and PantriesSenior Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsCommunity Food PantriesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…Local Food System Organizat…Ymca Youth DevelopmentEquine Therapy ProgramsAnimal Rescue and ShelterDevelopmental Disabilities …United Way AffiliatesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Immigrant Worker SupportDomestic Violence ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Jewish Community Organizati…Policy Research and AdvocacyCancer Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersIndependent K-12 SchoolsEnvironmental Conservation …Health Access Advocacy and …Addiction Recovery Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%4%35–55yr16%34%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%19/894
the rest of the field
13%
240,379/1,818,671

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

363 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
75
Early backer (in before they grew)
344/363
Grantees still filing
256/363
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BETH-EL FARM WORKER MINISTRY — $65,000 · OtherBETH-EL FARM WORKER MINISTRYThe James Clinic — $50,000 · OtherThe James ClinicWALNUT HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH — $26,000 · OtherWALNUT HILLS BAPTIST CHURCHWALNUT HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH — $25,072 · OtherWALNUT HILLS BAPTIST CHURCHFoster Church — $20,000 · OtherFoster ChurchMontessori Open House — $15,000 · OtherMontessori Open HouseMontessori Open House — $15,000 · OtherMontessori Open HousePleasant Green Missionary Baptist — $10,000 · OtherTOUCHING MOMENTS — $10,000 · OtherCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES — $10,000 · OtherCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association — $10,000 · Other+1 more — $6,000 · OtherBREAD OF LIFE INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesBREAD OF LIFE INCNEIGHBORHOOD BRIDGES — $30,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD BRIDGESMIRACLEFEET — $35,285 · HealthMIRACLEFEE…The Childrens Hospital — $5,000 · HealthThe Childr…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANC…Payton's Lemonade Stand — $25,000 · PhilanthropyR-3 RESTORATIONS — $16,800 · Crime & LegalPARTNERS INDIA INTERNATIONAL INC — $13,000 · ReligionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF THE MAHONING VALLEY — $6,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$262,072Human Services$130,000Health$45,285Philanthropy$25,000Crime & Legal$16,800Religion$13,000Food & Nutrition$6,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMIRACLEFEET — $35,285 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD BRIDGES — $30,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetPayton's Lemonade Stand — $25,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetR-3 RESTORATIONS — $16,800 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetPARTNERS INDIA INTERNATIONAL INC — $13,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF THE MAHONING VALLEY — $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Childrens Hospital — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BREAD OF LIFE INC
  • Who funds MIRACLEFEET
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD BRIDGES
  • Who funds Payton's Lemonade Stand
  • Who funds R-3 RESTORATIONS
  • Who funds PARTNERS INDIA INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds CITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES
  • Who funds COTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF THE MAHONING VALLEY
  • Who funds The Childrens Hospital
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater CincinnatiOH46.1× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Cincinnati · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Spaulding Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Freestore Foodbank Inc · Andrew Jergens Foundation · Millstone Fund · Tr Uw Jacob Schmidlapp #1 · Ruth J & Robert a Conway Foundation Inc · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Matthew 25 Ministries Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Matthew 25 Ministries Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Matthew 25 Ministries Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph