Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pauline F & W David Robbins Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$423k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$803kRecreation & Sports$516kYouth Development$462kArts & Culture$277kFood & Nutrition$169kHousing & Shelter$126kHealth$113kCommunity Improvement$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $148k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
$12,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE$200,000
DORCHESTER COUNTY FAMILY YMCA$50,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHOPTANK$25,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$20,000
JOHN & JANICE WYATT FOUNDATION$15,000
MIDSHORE MEALS TIL MONDAY$15,000
ONE MISSION CAMBRIDGE$15,000
DORCHESTER SKIPJACK COMMITTEE INC$15,000
DORCHESTER CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC$12,500
CASA OF THE MID-SHORE$10,000
DELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$10,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL INC$10,000
CAMBRIDGECAMBRIDGE POWER BOAT RACING ASSOC INC$8,000
NATIONAL OUTDOOR FOUNDATION INC$6,000
KITTY CITY RESCUE INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COURAGEOUS HEARTS HORSEMANSHIP INC: $5k → 15%COURAGEOUS HEARTS HORSEMANSHIP INC: $3k → 15%COURAGEOUS HEARTS HORSEMANSHIP INC: $3k → 15%COURAGEOUS HEARTS HORSEMANSHIP INC: $2k → 15%COURAGEOUS HEARTS HORSEMANSHIP INC: $2k → 15%COURAGEOUS HEARTS HORSEMEN: $1k → 15%ONE MISSION CAMBRIDGE: $15k → 15%ONE MISSION CAMBRIDGE: $10k → 15%ONE MISSION CAMBRIDGE: $10k → 15%DELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $10k → 15%DELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of Pauline F & W David Robbins Charitable Foundation Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in MD; by stated purpose, 79%.

Pauline F & W David Robbins Charitable Foundation Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 32 repeat orgs$203k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
10

Total granted

$2.4M
$203k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
0%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementAnimalsYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $450k · revenue +150%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHOPTANK INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $105k · revenue +145%
  • DS
    DORCHESTER SKIPJACK COMMITTEE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $87k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • RM
    RICHARDSON MARITIME MUSEUM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -60% · 52% of their budget
  • JB
    JAMES B RICHARDSON FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • MC
    Mid-Shore Community Radio Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue +935% · 35% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delmarva Discovery Center & Museum Inc

To foster appreciation of delmarva's unique natural and cultural heritage through education, exploration and enjoyment.

Arts & Culture
2
Dorchester Chamber of Commerce Inc

To promote business and community growth in the dorchester county area and programs of a civic, social, or cultural nature.

—
3
Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc
Arts & Culture
4
Dorchester County Public Library Inc

Residents of county will receive accurate information in various formats through the dorchester county public library. this information will successfully address residents' high priority education, recreation, and informational needs in a…

Education
5
Maryland Technology Museum Inc
Arts & Culture
6
Annapolis Maritime Museum Inc

The annapolis maritime museum educates youth and adults about the annapolis areas rich maritime heritage and the ecology of the chesapeake bay through programs, exhibits, and community events. continued on schedule o

—
7
Cape Cod Maritime Museuminc

To establish and operate a maritime museum and visitor hospitality center near hyannis harbor, in hyannis, massachusetts, and to conduct such other activities and programs in furtherance of the foregoing purposes.

Arts & Culture
8
Museum of Chincoteague Island Inc

Our mission is to document and provide education to promote the chincoteague & assateague islands' people, culture, and heritage.

Arts & Culture
9
Greater Chesapeake Foundation Inc

Greater chesapeake charitable foundation's mission is to improve the physical and financial wellness of marylanders in need by volunteering time and donating resources.

—
10
Middle Patuxent Environmental Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Chesapeake Childrens Museum Inc

Our mission is to create an environment of discovery about oneself, the peoples, the technologies and the ecologies of the Chesapeake Bay area for all children and the child in us all.

Arts & Culture
12
Baltimore County Historical Society Inc

The Historical Society of Baltimore County Collects, Preserves and Interprets the Rich History of Baltimore County for the Education and Enjoyment of Present and Future Generations.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Shore Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is James G Busick Tennus Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DORCHESTER COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $1,016,000 · OtherDORCHESTER COUNTY FAMILY YMCATHE SALVATION ARMY: $135,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHOPTANK INC: $105,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHOPTANK INCAUXILIARY OF DORCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherAUXILIARY OF DORCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL+23 more: $304,000 · Other+23 moreTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE: $450,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS AND GIRLS …RICHARDSON MARITIME MUSEUM INCORPORATED: $100,000 · Arts & CultureRICHARDSON MARI…DORCHESTER SKIPJACK COMMITTEE INC: $86,500 · Arts & CultureDORCHESTER SKIP…DORCHESTER CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $79,500 · Arts & CultureDORCHESTER CENT…National Outdoor Foundation Inc: $38,000 · Arts & CultureNational Outdoo…DORCHESTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $27,875 · Arts & CultureDORCHESTER COUN…Mid-Shore Community Radio Inc: $18,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $8,500 · Arts & CultureONE MISSION CAMBRIDGE INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesDELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCOURAGEOUS HEARTS HORSEMANSHIP INC: $16,400 · Human ServicesTHE PINE STREET COMMITTEE INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementJAMES G BUSICK TENNUS FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · Community ImprovementJOHN AND JANICE WYATT FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropyMID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · PhilanthropyMIDSHORE MEALS TIL MONDAY INC: $25,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,660,000Youth Development$450,000Arts & Culture$358,375Human Services$71,400Community Improvement$42,000Philanthropy$38,000Food & Nutrition$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE: $450,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHOPTANK INC: $105,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetRICHARDSON MARITIME MUSEUM INCORPORATED: $100,000 over 1y, 52% of budgetDORCHESTER SKIPJACK COMMITTEE INC: $86,500 over 8y, 22% of budgetDORCHESTER CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $79,500 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetNational Outdoor Foundation Inc: $38,000 over 7y, 46% of budgetONE MISSION CAMBRIDGE INC: $35,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetJOHN AND JANICE WYATT FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE PINE STREET COMMITTEE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetDORCHESTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $27,875 over 3y, 24% of budgetMIDSHORE MEALS TIL MONDAY INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCASA OF TALBOT COUNTY INC: $23,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetDELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMid-Shore Community Radio Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY RADIO INC: $17,500 over 3y, 15% of budgetCOURAGEOUS HEARTS HORSEMANSHIP INC: $16,400 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHARACTER COUNTS MID SHORE INC: $12,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetCAMBRIDGE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $8,500 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetMID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSNIP TUCK INC: $5,500 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetHARRIETS HOUSE: $1,200 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHOPTANK INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHARDSON MARITIME MUSEUM INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds DORCHESTER SKIPJACK COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds DORCHESTER CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds National Outdoor Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ONE MISSION CAMBRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN AND JANICE WYATT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PINE STREET COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds DORCHESTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDSHORE MEALS TIL MONDAY INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF TALBOT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds DELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Mid-Shore Community Radio Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds COURAGEOUS HEARTS HORSEMANSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMES G BUSICK TENNUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARACTER COUNTS MID SHORE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SNIP TUCK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Nathan Foundation Inc Ima Co Robert SMD43.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Nathan Foundation Inc Ima Co Robert S · Waddell Foundation Inc · Mid Shore Community Foundation Inc · Dock Street Foundation · Maryland Humanities Council Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pauline F & W David Robbins Charitable Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pauline F & W David Robbins Charitable Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Dorchester Center for the Arts Inc: 47% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity Choptank Inc: 10% of income from government
  • The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pauline F & W David Robbins’ filings →

More from the funding graph