· Private foundation
Bomberger Foundation Inc
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of Bomberger Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $84k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Sarasota Medical Pregnancy Center | $65,000 |
| Children's Hospital Foundation | $60,000 |
| Shriners Hospital for Children | $20,000 |
| Newman University | $20,000 |
| All Faiths Food Bank | $17,500 |
| Team Tony Foundation | $15,000 |
| Meals on Wheels Sarasota | $12,000 |
| Murphy Adventist Christian School | $10,000 |
| Pratt Health Foundation | $10,000 |
| Sacred Heart Church | $10,000 |
| Food Bank of Manatee | $8,000 |
| Assistance League of Greeley | $8,000 |
| Franklin High School | $7,500 |
| Woman to Woman | $7,000 |
| Woman's Place | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation3× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +42%
- SMSARASOTA MEDICAL PREGNANCY CENTER INC3× · 2017–2024 · $115k · revenue +289%
- NUNEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC3× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- MCMOFFIT CANCER CENTERone grant, 2017 · $25k
- HCHOPE CENTER INCone grant, 2017 · $10k
- ACAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -83%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To defend life, to meet physical, social and spiritual needs of those who may be experiencing a crisis pregnancy, to bring healing and wholeness to lives traumatized by abortion, to present the gospel of jesus christ, and to challenge the…
Mission: cultivate health by supporting individuals and the community at every step of their journey. vision: lead a future in which accessible, high-quality care sets the standard for all. adelante healthcare, a federally qualified health…
To carry out the healing ministry of jesus christ by providing comprehensive primary medical and health care, recognizing the religious conscience protections of the individuals providing and receiving such care, focused on the health and…
Formerly ywca wichita, the wichita family crisis center (wfcc) began operations in wichita, ks in 1907. wfcc's mission is to eliminate domestic violence in our community by supporting survivors through shelter, education & advocacy.
Dream centers serves vulnerable women and children who have nowhere else to turn. dream centers programs help those trapped in cycles of poverty to find hope, empbrace health, and build sustainable lives for themselves and their children.
The women's resource center's mission is to eliminate domestic violence and sexual assault abuse through advocacy, education, system change, and empowering services to all surviors. the center provides sexual assault and domestic violence…
Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.
The mission of the hope community health center (hope chc) is to provide high quality, compassionate, trauma-informed, primary and behavioral healthcare to all, and forensic services to victims of domestic violence, child abuse, sexual…
To empower women and families in the greater pueblo colorado area with the educational, emotional and spiritual resources they need to choose life and thrive.
The vision of family healing center is that all women and children who are victims of sexual abuse, severe physical abuse, and those who have witnessed abuse, will be treated sensitively by police, prosecution, and protection agencies…
Provide crisis intervention, counseling, and shelter; support and empowerment; education, information, and referrals to victims of sexual and domestic violence and to those significant in their lives; and outreach related to the issues of…
To help victims of intimate partner abuse or sexual violence become survivors through supportive services, community education and cooperative partnerships that foster hope, promote self-sufficiency and rebuild lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rehabilitation Center for Neurological Development and the most unlike its peers is Reach International Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds SARASOTA MEDICAL PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Volunteers Enriching Weld Inc ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels of Sarasota Inc ↗
- Who funds Pratt Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds A WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN TO WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds Reach International Corporation ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RESURRECTION HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds REHABILITATION CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds BRENT ELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WELD FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Guadalupe Clinic Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bomberger Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- All Faiths Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
- Tidewell Hospice Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.