· Private foundation
Paul & Phyllis Fireman Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k24 grants · $95k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $360k
- $50k–250k23 grants · $2.2M
- $250k+7 grants · $5.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BROCKTON HOSPITAL | $1,800,000 |
| EMORY UNIVERSITY (FOUNDATION) | $1,193,000 |
| THE PEOPLE'S PARK FOUNDATION | $750,000 |
| AMERICAN JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION | $550,000 |
| RON BURTON TRAINING VILLAGE | $500,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER BOSTON | $400,000 |
| LIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER | $250,000 |
| PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC | $200,000 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $200,000 |
| DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE | $150,000 |
| COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF GREATER BOSTON INC | $150,000 |
| BABSON COLLEGE | $130,000 |
| PROJECT HOPE | $125,000 |
| ONE FAMILY INC | $110,000 |
| TEAM IMPACT | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $5.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
78 repeat relationships — 57 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $473k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OFONE FAMILY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +25% · 52% of their budget
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +73%- BHBrockton Hospital Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +3%
Funded once
- CCCAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $270k
- MWMA WONDERFUND INCone grant, 2020 · $250k
- BRBOSTON RESILIENCY FUNDone grant, 2020 · $250k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To empower individuals from diverse communities to find employment and build careers, while partnering with employers to hire, develop, and retain productive workforces.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Impact Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Sanctified Church of Jesus Chri. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
140 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 140 of the 190 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PEOPLE'S PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ONE FAMILY INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds Brockton Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds LIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Ron Burton Training Village Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTON ↗
- Who funds American Junior Golf Association Inc ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
- Who funds THE HURLEY FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEAM IMPACT INC ↗
- Who funds THE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds TEAM WALKER INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
- Who funds BABSON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH BIG BROTHER & BIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON ↗
- Who funds Elon University ↗
- Who funds STORYVILLE CENTER FOR THE SPOKEN WORD INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF UNION COLLEGE IN THE TOWN OF SCHENECTADY IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Highland Street Connection and Subsidiaries · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The New England Patriots Charitable Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Suffolk Cares Charitable Foundation Inc · The Klarman Family Foundation · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Paul & Phyllis Fireman Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ironbound Community Corporation — 100% of income from government
- Team Walker Inc — 68% of income from government
- Utec Inc — 46% of income from government
- The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
- Cape Ann Museum Inc — 38% of income from government
- La Colaborativa Inc — 34% of income from government
- Food Bank of South Jersey Inc — 30% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Eva's Village Inc — 19% of income from government
- Three Bays Preservation Inc — 18% of income from government
- Heading Home Inc — 17% of income from government
- Liberty Science Center — 14% of income from government
- Brockton Hospital Inc — 13% of income from government
- The Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro South Inc — 13% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Women's Lunch Place Inc — 8% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Clinton Hill Community Action Inc — 6% of income from government
- Babson College — 3% of income from government
- Artists for Humanity Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc — 1% of income from government
- Worcester County Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
- One Family Inc — 1% of income from government
- Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc — 0% of income from government
- Project Just Because Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Fessenden School — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Steppingstone Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.