Skip to content

· Private foundation

Patten Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$104kPhilanthropy$14kEducation$8kAnimals$6kHealth$3kHuman Services$2kYouth Development$1kHousing & Shelter$850Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
6
States reached
$280k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLAYERS CIRCLE ART CENTER$5,000
CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATRE$5,000
THE CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE$2,500
FLORIDA REPERTORY THEATRE$2,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$500
COLLABORATORY$250
SALVATION ARMY$100
SOCIETY OF THE SACRED HEART$100
Individual grant recipient$100
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$100
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$100
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $607) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMP KESEM: $107 → 14%HOPE HOSPICE: $150 → 11%HOPE HOSPICE: $100 → 11%CLEARBROOK CENTER: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
SD
CA
CO
MO
VA
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$126k · 19 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
16

Total granted

$126k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+16%

Still filing today

53%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PLAYERS CIRCLE ART CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +77%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +70%
  • CF
    CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $6k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • IW
    I WILL MENTORSHIP FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • AS
    AUTISM SOCIETY OF COLORADO
    one grant, 2021 · $525 · revenue +16%
  • LM
    LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
12
American College of Gastroenterology

Our mission is to enhance the ability of our members to provide world class care to patients with digestive disorders and advance the profession through excellence and innovation based upon the pillars of patient care, education,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Shakespeare Theater; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATERPLAYERS CIRCLE ART CENTER INC: $19,500 · Arts & CulturePLAYERS CIRCLE ART CENTER INC+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureFLORIDA REPERTORY THEATRE: $30,382 · OtherFLORIDA REPERTORY THEATREIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+26 more: $7,676 · Other+26 moreSOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $13,650 · PhilanthropySOUTHWEST …TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $7,500 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $2,000 · EducationCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC: $6,387 · AnimalsAmerican Diabetes Association: $900 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $300 · HealthI WILL MENTORSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Youth Development
Arts & Culture$71,500Other$41,058Philanthropy$13,650Education$9,500Animals$6,387Health$1,200Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $50,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPLAYERS CIRCLE ART CENTER INC: $19,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $13,650 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC: $6,387 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetI WILL MENTORSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF COLORADO: $525 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLEARBROOK: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTPORT RIVER WATERSHED ALLIANCE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $107 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER ↗
  • Who funds PLAYERS CIRCLE ART CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds I WILL MENTORSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SOCIETY OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEARBROOK ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTPORT RIVER WATERSHED ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The United Way of Lee County IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The United Way of Lee County Inc · Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Patten Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Patten Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 69%
  • Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Patten Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Patten Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Patten Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph