· Private foundation
Patrick and Aimee Butler Family
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k65 grants · $1.6M
- $50k–250k16 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| AVENUES FOR YOUTH | $150,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY MN-SD-ND CH | $120,000 |
| LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOT | $120,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST PAUL AND | $110,000 |
| WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA | $100,000 |
| HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION | $55,000 |
| RAMSEY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY LA | $55,000 |
| MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $55,000 |
| COLLEGEVILLE INSTITUTE | $55,000 |
| THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS | $55,000 |
| WORCESTER ART MUSEUM | $55,000 |
| MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ART | $55,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST PAUL AND | $55,000 |
| WILDERNESS INQUIRY | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $5.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
118 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2024, 58 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $285k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSPEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE CHARITIES INC4× · 2020–2023 · $538k · revenue +3%
- JPJEREMIAH PROGRAM4× · 2020–2023 · $463k · revenue +120%
- AHAGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC4× · 2020–2023 · $458k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- CCCLUES COMUNIDADES LATINAS UNIDAS EN SERVICIOone grant, 2020 · $240k
- TNTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY MN-SD-ND CHAPTERone grant, 2020 · $238k
- CCCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolisone grant, 2020 · $230k · revenue -36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.
Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…
Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…
MinnPost produces independent journalism to serve as a trusted guide for Minnesotans exploring the critical issues, challenges and opportunities facing our state.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
Minnesota Voice is a collaboration of organizations working toward permanent change in social, racial, and economic justice by increasing civic engagement and voter participation across the state.
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
VEAP is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, multi-service, human service organization with the mission of "Together, we create pathways to stronger, more hopeful, communities through access to healthy food, housing stability and supportive services."
To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hmong American Partnership and the most unlike its peers is East African Healing Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
167 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 167 of the 214 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds AGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds EMMA NORTON SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Women's Foundation of Minnesota ↗
- Who funds FamilyWise Services ↗
- Who funds TUBMAN ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HOUSING FUND ↗
- Who funds AVIVO ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
- Who funds PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds WILDERNESS INQUIRY INC ↗
- Who funds AVENUES FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER ↗
- Who funds WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE ST PAUL AND RAMSEY COUNTY DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Breaking Free Inc ↗
- Who funds AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds THE LINK ↗
- Who funds Solid Ground ↗
- Who funds PROPEL NONPROFITS ↗
- Who funds The Family Partnership ↗
- Who funds DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
- Who funds RAMSEY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Domestic Abuse Project Inc ↗
- Who funds HEADWATERS FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds GREAT RIVER GREENING ↗
- Who funds Coalition Against Trafficking In Women ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fr Bigelow Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Pohlad Family Foundation · Target Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Hardenbergh Foundation · Mardag Foundation · Mortenson Family Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Patrick and Aimee Butler Family funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Groundworks Collaborative Inc — 73% of income from government
- The Copeland Center for Wellness and Recovery Inc — 33% of income from government
- Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
- Rescue Inc — 7% of income from government
- Cornerstone Montgomery — 3% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Worcester Art Museum — 1% of income from government
- The Vermont Community Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Patrick and Aimee Butler Family?
Find your warmest path to Patrick and Aimee Butler Family through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.