Skip to content
Patricia King Ministries at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Patricia King Ministries

Lead souls to christ, promote spiritual growth, love, understanding, and tolerance amongst all christians, provide spiritual education and resources worldwide by all means available, provide supplies and services to those in need.

$268k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.6MInternational$336kFood & Nutrition$16kHealth$9kPhilanthropy$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $183,953, the rows itemized in this filing. The $267,676 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $83,723 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $154k
$9,410
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHILOH FELLOWSHIP$48,706
TROY BREWER MINISTRIES$46,055
IRIS GLOBAL$33,860
EXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES$25,622
GLOBAL AWAKENING$9,410
HIM$5,300
CHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS$5,000
WOMEN ON THE FRONTLINE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHURCH FOR THE NATIONS: $26k → 11%BREAKTHROUGH MINISTRIES US: $25k → 11%GLOBAL AWAKENING: $14k → 8%GLOBAL NETWORK MINISTRIES IN: $18k → 10%ELISHA REVOLUTION: $10k → 11%NORTH COUNTY HEALING ROOMS: $9k → 12%HIM: $9k → 14%SCHAMBACH FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%POUR IT OUT MINISTRIES: $12k → 16%KING JESUS MINISTRY: $34k → 15%PASSION AND FIRE MINISTRIES: $10k → 16%IRIS GLOBAL: $34k → 4%DESTINY ENCOUNTERS: $15k → 10%THE ALTAR GLOBAL INC: $15k → 8%GLOBAL MISSION AWARENESS: $10k → 6%MESSENGER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 9%OVERFLOW GLOBAL MINISTRIES: $10k → 16%RUTH HENDRICKSON MINISTRIES DBA TOU: $10k → 4%LOVE IN ACTION: $40k → 8%CHURCH FOR THE NATIONS: $16k → 11%AND SUDDENLY MINISTRIES: $20k → 11%GLOBAL AWAKENING: $9k → 8%GLOBAL NETWORK MINISTRIES IN: $9k → 10%SHILOH GLOBAL MINISTRIES INC: $131k → 12%HIM: $9k → 14%POUR IT OUT: $9k → 16%GOD TV: $56k → 11%KING JESUS MINISTRY: $9k → 15%OVERFLOW GLOBAL MINISTRIES: $10k → 16%SHILOH FELLOWSHIP: $125k → 11%GLOBAL AWAKENING: $9k → 8%GOD TV: $49k → 11%EXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES: $112k → 11%SHILOH FELLOWSHIP: $92k → 11%SHILOH FELLOWSHIP: $62k → 11%EXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES: $54k → 11%HARVEST INTERNAITONAL MINISTRIES: $9k → 14%SHILOH FELLOWSHIP: $49k → 11%EXPECTED END MINISTRIES: $42k → 11%EXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES: $41k → 11%SHILOH FELLOWSHIP: $41k → 11%SHILOH FELLOWSHIP: $39k → 11%EXPECTED END MINISTRIES: $33k → 11%EXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES: $32k → 11%EXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES: $31k → 11%SHILOH FELLOWSHIP: $31k → 11%EXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES: $30k → 11%EXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES: $26k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 17 repeat orgs$494k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
31

Total granted

$1.5M
$443k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
0%

Still filing today

47%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EL
    EXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES
    7× · 2018–2024 · $326k · revenue +20% · 28% of their budget
  • IG
    IRIS GLOBAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $138k · revenue +42%
  • EE
    EXPECTED END MINISTRIES
    4× · 2017–2022 · $88k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SG
    SHILOH GLOBAL MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $131k · 25% of their budget
  • LI
    LOVE IN ACTION MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · 58% of their budget
  • EM
    EAGLE MOUNTAIN INTERNATIONAL CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $39k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
2
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
3
Making Jesus Known Evangelistic Ministries

Preaching the message of Jesus Christ around the world through large events.

—
4
Evangelism Partners International
Religion
5
Equippers Group International

To produce and publish training materials for church leadership and development. To facilitate churches groups and individual participation in world mission.

Religion
6
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
7
Power Ministries International Inc
—
8
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
9
Explore God Network
—
10
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
11
Divine Revelation Ministry
Religion
12
Emanual Ministries International
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Passion & Fire Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Elisha Revolution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/28
Grantees still filing
12/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHILOH FELLOWSHIP INC: $437,799 · OtherSHILOH FELLOWSHIP INCGLOBAL AWAKENING: $46,256 · OtherHARVEST INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $45,039 · OtherCHURCH FOR THE NATIONS: $42,674 · OtherEAGLE MOUNTAIN INTERNATIONAL CHURCH INC: $39,000 · OtherKING JESUS MINISTRY: $33,500 · Other+19 more: $224,357 · Other+19 moreAngel Christian Television Trust Inc: $178,006 · ReligionAngel Christian Television Trust IncSHILOH GLOBAL MINISTRIES INC: $131,000 · ReligionSHILOH GLOBAL MINISTRIES INCEXPECTED END MINISTRIES: $87,703 · ReligionEXPECTED END MINISTRIESWOFL INC: $49,844 · ReligionWOFL INCTROY BREWER CHARITABLE NETWORK: $46,055 · ReligionTROY BREWER CHARITABLE NETWORKCHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS: $25,000 · ReligionThe Altar Global Inc: $23,000 · Religion+15 more: $107,583 · Religion+15 moreEXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES: $326,090 · InternationalEXTREME LOVE MINISTRIESIRIS GLOBAL: $137,526 · InternationalIRIS GLOBALLOVE IN ACTION MINISTRIES INC: $40,000 · Public Benefit
Other$868,625Religion$648,191International$463,616Public Benefit$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES: $326,090 over 7y, 28% of budgetAngel Christian Television Trust Inc: $178,006 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetIRIS GLOBAL: $137,526 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSHILOH GLOBAL MINISTRIES INC: $131,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetEXPECTED END MINISTRIES: $87,703 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetWOFL INC: $49,844 over 2y, 10% of budgetTROY BREWER CHARITABLE NETWORK: $46,055 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOVE IN ACTION MINISTRIES INC: $40,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetCHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Altar Global Inc: $23,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetENCOUNTERS NETWORK A MINISTRY TO THE NATIONS: $15,915 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetELISHA REVOLUTION: $15,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDestiny Encounters International Inc: $14,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMessenger International Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGlobal Mission Awareness: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPASSION & FIRE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLEANNE GOFF MINISTRIES INC: $7,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetGLORY OF ZION INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSean Smith Ministries Inc: $6,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetREVIVAL MANDATE INTERNATIONAL: $6,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetGLOBAL SPHERES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHOPE FOR THE HARVEST INC: $5,083 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetRobby Dawkins Ministry: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEAGLES NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRENNY MCLEAN MINISTRIES INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Angel Christian Television Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds IRIS GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds SHILOH GLOBAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds EXPECTED END MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds WOFL INC ↗
  • Who funds TROY BREWER CHARITABLE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds LOVE IN ACTION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS ↗
  • Who funds The Altar Global Inc ↗
  • Who funds ENCOUNTERS NETWORK A MINISTRY TO THE NATIONS ↗
  • Who funds ELISHA REVOLUTION ↗
  • Who funds Destiny Encounters International Inc ↗
  • Who funds Messenger International Inc ↗
  • Who funds TOUCHED BY JESUS MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Global Mission Awareness ↗
  • Who funds PASSION & FIRE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LEANNE GOFF MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GLORY OF ZION INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Sean Smith Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds REVIVAL MANDATE INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community F…SuperChannel Worship …Glory of Zion Interna…Servant FoundationNatl Christian Charit…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Christian Community Foundation IncCO16.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · SuperChannel Worship Ministries Inc · Glory of Zion International Ministries Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Patricia King Ministries funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Patricia King Ministries. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Patricia King Ministries?

    Find your warmest path to Patricia King Ministries through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Patricia King Ministries’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home