· Public charity
Patricia King Ministries
Lead souls to christ, promote spiritual growth, love, understanding, and tolerance amongst all christians, provide spiritual education and resources worldwide by all means available, provide supplies and services to those in need.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $183,953 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $267,676 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $83,723 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $154k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SHILOH FELLOWSHIP | $48,706 |
| TROY BREWER MINISTRIES | $46,055 |
| IRIS GLOBAL | $33,860 |
| EXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES | $25,622 |
| GLOBAL AWAKENING | $9,410 |
| HIM | $5,300 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| WOMEN ON THE FRONTLINE | $5,000 |
| CHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ELEXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES7× · 2018–2024 · $326k · revenue +20% · 28% of their budget
- IGIRIS GLOBAL8× · 2017–2024 · $138k · revenue +18%
- EEEXPECTED END MINISTRIES4× · 2017–2022 · $88k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- SGSHILOH GLOBAL MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2023 · $131k · 25% of their budget
- LILOVE IN ACTION MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2017 · $40k · 58% of their budget
- EMEAGLE MOUNTAIN INTERNATIONAL CHURCH INCone grant, 2017 · $39k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ
Religious Purposes
Preaching the message of Jesus Christ around the world through large events.
To produce and publish training materials for church leadership and development. To facilitate churches groups and individual participation in world mission.
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Passion & Fire Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Elisha Revolution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EXTREME LOVE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Angel Christian Television Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds IRIS GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds SHILOH GLOBAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds EXPECTED END MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds WOFL INC ↗
- Who funds TROY BREWER CHARITABLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds LOVE IN ACTION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS ↗
- Who funds The Altar Global Inc ↗
- Who funds ENCOUNTERS NETWORK A MINISTRY TO THE NATIONS ↗
- Who funds ELISHA REVOLUTION ↗
- Who funds Destiny Encounters International Inc ↗
- Who funds Messenger International Inc ↗
- Who funds PASSION & FIRE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds TOUCHED BY JESUS MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds Global Mission Awareness ↗
- Who funds LEANNE GOFF MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds GLORY OF ZION INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Sean Smith Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds REVIVAL MANDATE INTERNATIONAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · SuperChannel Worship Ministries Inc · Glory of Zion International Ministries Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Patricia King Ministries funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Patricia King Ministries?
Find your warmest path to Patricia King Ministries through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.