Skip to content
Partners Ending Homelessness at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Partners Ending Homelessness

PARTNERS ENDING HOMELESSNESS encourages public understanding of the causes and conditions of homelessness and leads a strong and stable system of care for individuals and families to reduce homelessness in guilford county.

$687k
Granted FY2019
8
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$199k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Housing & Shelter$2.0M
02FY2019 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $547k
$67,821
Median grant
1
States reached
$189k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SERVANT CENTER INC$199,167
SALVATION ARMY$185,996
GREENSBORO HOUSING COALITION$94,075
YOUTH FOCUS$67,821
ROOM AT THE INN$40,994
YWCA OF GREENSBORO$37,001
FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT$32,757
GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY$29,094
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $941k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $58k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $33k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $33k → 16%YOUTH FOCUS: $68k → 16%YOUTH FOCUS: $58k → 16%YOUTH FOCUS: $58k → 16%INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER: $57k → 16%ROOM AT THE INN: $41k → 16%THE SERVANT CENTER INC: $199k → 16%THE SERVANT CENTER INC: $136k → 16%THE SERVANT CENTER INC: $111k → 16%GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY: $30k → 16%GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY: $30k → 16%GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY: $29k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 8 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$1.9M
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+45%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SERVANT CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $447k · revenue +259%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $124k · revenue +30%
  • GU
    GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $88k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • THE INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $57k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Welcome House Inc

Welcome house provides a continuum of services to end homelessness and promote stability for each person we serve.

Housing & Shelter
2
Pathways Inc

Empowering women and children on their path out of homelessness through hospitality, housing, and hope.

Human Services
3
Samaritan House Inc

Provide shelter and basic needs for homeless people. while fostering self-respect and human dignity, samaritan house will encourage the residents' efforts to find employment and housing.

Housing & Shelter
4
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
5
Tedford Housing

Tedford housing's mission is to empower people to move from homelessness to home. established in 1987, tedford's conprehensive approach to reducing homelessness and mitigating its impact on our communities includes providing homelessness…

Housing & Shelter
6
Volunteer Ministry Center

To work with homeless individuals so that they achieve housing and access to supportive services. also, the organization works to prevent homelessness for marginally housed individuals.

Housing & Shelter
7
My Sisters House Inc

Services for abused women & their children

—
8
Turning Point Community Services Inc

Homeless shelter

Housing & Shelter
9
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

—
10
Gateway Homeless Services Inc

To empower adults and families to become independent and permanently housed. the organization provides shelter, food, and other life sustaining materials and activities for destitute families, children and the homeless in the city of st.…

Human Services
11
Inner City Night Shelter Inc

A non-profit corporation that provides shelter for homeless men and women in savannah, georgia.

Housing & Shelter
12
Exodus Housing

To serve diverse households fleeing domestic violence with equitable, client-centered services that are inclusive, foster long-term self-sufficiency and promote access to permanent housing and community resources.hope - through compassion…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Room At the Inn Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ywca Greensboro. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $547,543 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYGREENSBORO HOUSING COALITION INC: $282,225 · OtherGREENSBORO HOUSING COALITION INCMARYS HOUSE INC: $120,530 · OtherMARYS HOUSE INCYWCA Greensboro: $112,037 · OtherYWCA GreensboroTHE SERVANT CENTER INC: $447,131 · Human ServicesTHE SERVANT CENTER INCYOUTH FOCUS INC: $183,069 · Human ServicesYOUTH FOCUS INCFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $124,185 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INCGREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY: $88,094 · Human ServicesGREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRYTHE INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $57,259 · Human ServicesTHE INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER INCROOM AT THE INN INC: $40,994 · Human Services
Other$1,062,335Human Services$940,732

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREENSBORO HOUSING COALITION INC: $282,225 over 3y, 12% of budgetYOUTH FOCUS INC: $183,069 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $124,185 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMARYS HOUSE INC: $120,530 over 2y, 21% of budgetYWCA Greensboro: $112,037 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetGREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY: $88,094 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $57,259 over 1y, 4.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Lincoln Financial Fou…United Way of Greater…Weaver Foundation IncDavid and Claudia Bab…Moses H Cone Memorial…Moses Cone - Wesley L…Tannenbaum-Sternberge…The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…
Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro IncNC19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Greensboro Inc · Weaver Foundation Inc · David and Claudia Babb Reich Family Foundation · Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation · Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community Health Foundation · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Partners Ending Homelessness funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Partners Ending Homelessness. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Partners Ending Homelessness’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home