Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Paroz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$237kInternational$145kHuman Services$87kAnimals$60kHealth$56kFood & Nutrition$39kYouth Development$15kArts & Culture$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$406k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAY CHAPEL$35,035
CINCINNATI CHALLENGE RANCH$15,000
A CARING PLACE PREGNANCY HELP$15,000
CITY GOSPEL MISSION$15,000
CRU$5,000
MOMS HOPE$5,000
BRIDGE THE GAP URBAN OUTREACH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
RAYO DE SOL$5,000
WYCLIFF ASSOCIATES$5,000
CFC MINISTRIES$5,000
JESUS FILLM PROJECT$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%MOM'S HOPE: $10k → 6%MOMS HOPE: $5k → 6%A CARING PLACE PREGNANCY HELP: $20k → 16%A CARING PLACE PREGNANCY HELP: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MI
NV
OH
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$520k · 27 repeat orgs$222k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
43

Total granted

$520k
$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+27%

Still filing today

37%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RD
    RAYO DE SOL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $95k · revenue +85%
  • CG
    CITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +38%
  • M2
    Matthew 25 Ministries Inc
    6× · 2018–2023 · $39k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • IF
    INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTI
    one grant, 2024 · $17k
  • OC
    OUTBACK CINCINNATI
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

3
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
4
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
5
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
6
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
7
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
8
Challenge Ministries Us

The organization exists to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ while providing support and serving the poor through benevolent assistance, medical services, education, orphan care, church planting, etc.

International
9
Global Impact Ministries Inc Dba Love Life

Love Life is uniting and mobilizing the church to create a culture of love and life that will bring an end to abortion and the orphan crisis.

Religion
10
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services
11
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
12
Compassion International Incorporated

Compassion exists to release children from poverty in Jesus' name. Compassion serves all children, regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or gender.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Rayo De Sol Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesSubstance Abuse TreatmentDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Veteran Support ServicesJewish Community FederationsHomeless Services & ShelterHospice Care ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Public University Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%45%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,526

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JH RANCH — $59,500 · OtherJH RANCHCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES — $47,000 · OtherCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATESBAY CHAPEL INC — $41,035 · OtherBAY CHAPEL INCCINCINNATI CHALLENGE RANCH — $31,500 · OtherCINCINNATI CHALLENGE RANCHIndividual grant recipient — $31,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSEVEN HILLS CHURCH — $21,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTI — $16,666 · Other+49 more — $249,050 · Other+49 moreRAYO DE SOL INC — $94,666 · InternationalRAYO DE SOL INCMatthew 25 Ministries Inc — $38,500 · InternationalMatthew 25 Ministries …Mercy Ships International — $7,000 · International+3 more — $8,000 · International+3 moreA CARING PLACE PREGNANCY HELP CENTER — $35,000 · Human ServicesMOMSHOPE INC — $15,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesARTISTS IN CHRISTIAN TESTIMONY INC — $10,000 · ReligionBack 2 Back Ministries Inc — $5,000 · ReligionCFC Ministries Inc — $5,000 · ReligionShalom Ministries Internationa — $2,450 · ReligionAndrew Wommack Ministries Inc — $1,950 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,500 · ReligionThe Christian Broadcasting Network Inc — $1,000 · ReligionTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $13,000 · PhilanthropyYOUNG LIFE — $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentOUR RESCUE — $1,667 · Arts & Culture
Other$497,151International$148,166Human Services$51,000Religion$26,900Philanthropy$13,000Youth Development$7,500Arts & Culture$1,667

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRAYO DE SOL INC — $94,666 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES — $47,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc — $38,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI CHALLENGE RANCH — $31,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetMOMSHOPE INC — $15,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTISTS IN CHRISTIAN TESTIMONY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBack 2 Back Ministries Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCFC Ministries Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetStrong Tower Ministries Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetShalom Ministries Internationa — $2,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $1,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Christian Broadcasting Network Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES INTL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAYO DE SOL INC
  • Who funds CITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES
  • Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc
  • Who funds A CARING PLACE PREGNANCY HELP CENTER
  • Who funds CINCINNATI CHALLENGE RANCH
  • Who funds MOMSHOPE INC
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ARTISTS IN CHRISTIAN TESTIMONY INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO15.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Shell USA Company Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Verizon Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Paroz Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Paroz Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Paroz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph