· Private foundation
Park West Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $96k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE KING'S TRUST USA | $100,000 |
| BEST BUDDIES | $25,000 |
| LES DEMERLE AMLIA ISLAND JAZZ FESTIVAL INC | $15,000 |
| GARY SINISE FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $12,500 |
| MICHIGAN EDUCATION TRUST-FOSTERING FUTURES SCHOLARSHIP | $11,000 |
| PARKINSONS ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO | $10,000 |
| MONTHAVEN ARTS AND CULTURAL CENTER | $10,000 |
| CHABAD | $9,000 |
| PATRIOT PROMISE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SHERIDAN HOUSE FAMILY MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| ARMED FORCES SERVICES CENTER INC | $3,000 |
| BLUESTONE VOICES FOR AUTISM | $3,000 |
| MICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $147k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
60 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS2× · 2019–2023 · $101k · revenue +10%
Best Buddies International Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +43%- NCNational Congress of Parents & Teachers3× · 2017–2019 · $63k · revenue +123%
Funded once
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTIONone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +3%
THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTSgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +46%- HWHIS WILL HOMES INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +33% · 33% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
To ensure that policymakers prioritize the needs of the most challenged children from cradle to career.
Friends of the children - detroit has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
To develop and promote programs, funding, etc. for children and families.
Helping families and neighborhoods succeed by providing a place and support to assure kids ages 0-5 are school ready and families are healthy and stable.
The league's mission is to promote racial equity, economic security, health, and well being for all people in michigan through policy change.
Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.
To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.
To ensure all michigan children and youth with emotional, behavioral, or mental health challenges and their families live in a safe, welcoming community with access to needed services and supports.
To advance the safety, independence, and economic stability of those most affected by poverty, racism, and other structurally oppressive systems by increasing access to justice and working for systemic solutions.
The new foster care will show the love of jesus christ by making a measurable, meaningful, and transformative change in the michigan foster care system and in the lives of those who have experienced foster care by: 1) providing direct…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alternatives for Girls and the most unlike its peers is Orthopedic Kneed Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 149 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PRINCE OF WALES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds THE KING'S TRUST USA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS ↗
- Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
- Who funds National Congress of Parents & Teachers ↗
- Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Community Home Health & Hospice ↗
- Who funds MONTHAVEN ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds LES DEMERLE AMELIA ISLAND JAZZ FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds HIS WILL HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds CLINICS CAN HELP INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds ARMED FORCES SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ↗
- Who funds University of Michigan ↗
- Who funds SHERIDAN HOUSE FAMILY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds BOOST OAKLAND BUSINESS ↗
- Who funds THE LINGAP CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STARR COMMONWEALTH ↗
- Who funds Welcomed Inc ↗
- Who funds DYSTONIA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL COALITION ON ADOPTION INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dte Energy Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Ford Philanthropy · Comerica Charitable Foundation · The Skillman Foundation · McGregor Fund · Consumers Energy Foundation · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · The Kresge Foundation · Wendell & Doris Rogers Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Park West Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Voices for Children Foundation Inc — 48% of income from government
- United Way of Broward County Inc — 27% of income from government
- Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc — 19% of income from government
- Pushcart Players Inc — 18% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Guy Harvey Ocean Fund Inc — 0% of income from government
- Comfort Cases Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.