Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Park Nicollet Foundation

PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION's mission is to improve the health and well-being of our patients, families and community through partnerships and philanthropy.

$2.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$875k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$26MRecreation & Sports$270kFood & Nutrition$101kHuman Services$20k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $1,968,922 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,126,141 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $157,219 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.9M
$16,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$86M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARK NICOLLET CLINIC$874,998
HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE$370,063
ST LOUIS PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT$321,318
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA$284,178
CHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVICES$55,000
PORTICO HEALTHNET$16,000
GROUP HEALTH INC$12,970
BROOKLYN CENTER COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$11,000
RICHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS$11,000
CHW SOLUTIONS LLC$6,875
LAKEVIEW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION$5,520
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MYHEALTH FOR TEENS & YOUNG ADULTS: $20k → 11%INTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS (CEAP): $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25M · 10 repeat orgs$938k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$25M
$629k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+39%

Still filing today

50%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $310k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $617k · revenue +19%
  • CD
    CHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $401k · revenue +88%
  • PH
    PORTICO HEALTHNET
    8× · 2017–2024 · $148k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • SL
    ST LOUIS PARK FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $270k
  • CO
    CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
    one grant, 2023 · $270k
  • MF
    MYHEALTH FOR TEENS AND YOUNG ADULTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
2
Neighborhood Healthsource

It is the mission of neighborhood healthsource to improve the health of our communities by providing quality health care services that are affordable and accessible, while advancing health equity for all.

3
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

4
Centracare Health System - Long Prairie

We're here for your whole life to listen, then serve, to guide and heal because health means everything.

Health
5
Glencoe Regional Health Services

Glencoe regional health services exists to improve every life by offering high-quality, safe, and accessible healthcare. we are dedicated to strengthening healthcare by connecting our communities, enhancing the patient experience,…

Health
6
Regions Hospital

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality health care which meets the needs of all people. our vision is to be the patient-centered hospital of choice of our community.

Health
7
Ramsey Integrated Health Services

Ramsey integrated health services' mission is to provide the best home care experience that meets the needs of our patients.

8
Minnesota Community Healthcare Network

Minnesota community healthcare networks (mchn) mission is to transform the lives of people with mental illness by forming regional alliances to create and continuously improve comprehensive treatment and integrated care models that promote…

Health
9
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
10
NorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc

Our mission is "Partnering to Create a Healthier Community." NorthPoint seeks to reduce health disparities, improve health outcomes, and enhance the overall quality of life for all residents of North Minneapolis

Health
11
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

12
Northland Health Partners Community Health Center

Northland community health center is committed to providing access to affordable and quality health services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lakeview Memorial Hospital Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is 360 Communities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES — $13,175,030 · OtherPARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICESPARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES — $9,879,177 · OtherPARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES+11 more — $1,543,926 · Other+11 moreHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE — $616,683 · HealthCHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVICES INC — $401,250 · HealthPORTICO HEALTHNET — $147,613 · HealthPARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES — $130,000 · Health+2 more — $18,490 · HealthMYHEALTH FOR TEENS AND YOUNG ADULTS INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesINTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS INC — $10,000 · Human Services360 Communities — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$24,598,133Health$1,314,036Human Services$40,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE — $616,683 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVICES INC — $401,250 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA — $284,178 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetPORTICO HEALTHNET — $147,613 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetPARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES — $130,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS PARK EMERGENCY PROGRAM INC — $65,812 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMYHEALTH FOR TEENS AND YOUNG ADULTS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGROUP HEALTH INC — $12,970 over 1y, 0.0% of budget360 Communities — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLAKEVIEW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC — $5,520 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA
  • Who funds PORTICO HEALTHNET
  • Who funds PARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES
  • Who funds ST LOUIS PARK EMERGENCY PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds MYHEALTH FOR TEENS AND YOUNG ADULTS INC
  • Who funds GROUP HEALTH INC
  • Who funds INTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds 360 Communities
  • Who funds INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS
  • Who funds COMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS INC
  • Who funds LAKEVIEW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Otto Bremer Trust · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Allina Health System · Minnesota Community Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Target Foundation · Hunger Solutions Minnesota · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Park Nicollet Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph