Skip to content
Park City Board of Realtors - Phila at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Park City Board of Realtors - Phila

To raise funds for charitable causes

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$158kHuman Services$103kEducation$53kHealth$44kPhilanthropy$23k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $20,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $45,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $25,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$120k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%THE PEACE HOUSE: $11k → 5%THE PEACE HOUSE: $8k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$303k · 6 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$303k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+44%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $85k · revenue +16%
  • FC
    FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $28k · revenue +33%
  • WC
    WASATCH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUN
    3× · 2020–2022 · $28k · revenue +224%

Funded once

  • PH
    PEOPLES HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $17k
  • CS
    CONNECT SUMMIT COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $17k · revenue -38%
  • SC
    SUMMIT COUNTY CLUBHOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOUNTAINLANDS COMMUNITY HOUSING ASS: $130,500 · OtherMOUNTAINLANDS COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC: $27,500 · OtherFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INCPEOPLES HEALTH CENTER: $17,000 · OtherPEOPLES HEALTH CENTERPark City School District: $15,000 · OtherPark City School DistrictPCHS COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM: $10,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $84,500 · ReligionCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK …WASATCH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUN: $27,500 · EducationCONNECT SUMMIT COUNTY: $16,500 · HealthSUMMIT COUNTY CLUBHOUSE: $10,000 · HealthWasatch Community Foundation: $22,500 · PhilanthropyPeace House Inc: $18,000 · Human Services
Other$200,000Religion$84,500Education$27,500Health$26,500Philanthropy$22,500Human Services$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $84,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC: $27,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetWASATCH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUN: $27,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetWasatch Community Foundation: $22,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetPeace House Inc: $18,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCONNECT SUMMIT COUNTY: $16,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSUMMIT COUNTY CLUBHOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Promontory FoundationSsir Cares IncPark City Community F…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Promontory FoundationUT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Promontory Foundation · Ssir Cares Inc · Park City Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Park City Board of Realtors - Phila funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Park City Board of Realtors - Phila. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Park City Board of Realtors - Phila?

    Find your warmest path to Park City Board of Realtors - Phila through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Park City Board of Realtors - Phila’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home