Skip to content
Paris Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Paris Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$43kPhilanthropy$17kInternational$16kCivil Rights$10kHuman Services$8kHealth$4kArts & Culture$3kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$200k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$3,000
THE AURELIA FOUNDATION$2,500
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY$500
THE ARC OF CALIFORNIA$500
DISABILITY VOICES UNITED$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%VISTA DEL MAR: $250 → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $250 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELE: $500 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELE: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
KY
VA
TN
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$67k · 42 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
16

Total granted

$67k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+28%

Still filing today

57%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionCivil RightsInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE AURELIA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +19%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    4× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +78%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    3× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $26k · revenue +31%
  • C
    CHABADORG
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • F
    FLAME
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
2
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
3
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
5
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
6
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
7
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
8
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
9
Atlanta Jewish Academy Inc

Atlanta jewish academy is a college preparatory, co-educational, preschool-12th grade, independent jewish day school, guided by modern orthodox values and principles. we embody the ideals of community, tradition, individual development and…

Education
10
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
11
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
12
Avodah the Jewish Service Corps Inc

Avodah develops lifelong social justice leaders whose work is informed by jewish values and who inspire the jewish community to work toward a more just and equitable world.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Arthur Szyk Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD: $5,200 · OtherCHABADJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATL SECUR AFF: $4,000 · OtherJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATL SECUR AFFJEWISH WAR VETERANS OF USA: $2,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY: $2,000 · OtherCHABADORG: $1,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,800 · OtherJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL: $1,780 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,360 · Other+36 more: $18,230 · Other+36 moreCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,500 · ReligionCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL …ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $2,000 · ReligionZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $1,000 · ReligionWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $1,000 · ReligionTHE AURELIA FOUNDATION: $15,150 · PhilanthropyTHE AURELIA FOUND…FEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyFEED ISRAEL FOUND…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $4,000 · InternationalJEWISH NAT…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $3,000 · InternationalAMERICAN F…COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $2,000 · InternationalCOMMITTEE …AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $1,000 · InternationalAMERICAN C…ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $6,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $200 · Civil RightsAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWESTERN STATES JEWISH HISTORY: $500 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $1,000 · Human ServicesVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $500 · Human Services
Other$38,170Religion$29,500Philanthropy$16,150International$10,000Civil Rights$7,200Arts & Culture$2,500Human Services$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AURELIA FOUNDATION: $15,150 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON UNIVERSITY HILLEL INC: $1,180 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARC California: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN STATES JEWISH HISTORY: $500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInfact DBA Corporate Accountability: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDISABILITY RIGHTS CALIFORNIA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON LATIN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF SILICON VALLEY INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Arthur Szyk Society: $100 over 2y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Fede…Jewish Communal FundNational Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paris Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paris Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Infact Dba Corporate Accountability: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Paris Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Paris Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paris Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home