Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Paris Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$43kPhilanthropy$17kInternational$16kCivil Rights$10kHuman Services$8kHealth$4kArts & Culture$3kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$200k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$3,000
THE AURELIA FOUNDATION$2,500
DISABILITY VOICES UNITED$500
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY$500
THE ARC OF CALIFORNIA$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%VISTA DEL MAR: $250 → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $250 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELE: $500 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELE: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
KY
VA
TN
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$67k · 42 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
16

Total granted

$67k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+28%

Still filing today

57%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionCivil RightsInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE AURELIA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +19%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    4× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +78%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    3× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $26k · revenue +31%
  • C
    CHABADORG
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • FI
    FEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

2
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
3
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

5
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
6
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
7
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
8
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
9
Atlanta Jewish Academy Inc

Atlanta jewish academy is a college preparatory, co-educational, preschool-12th grade, independent jewish day school, guided by modern orthodox values and principles. we embody the ideals of community, tradition, individual development and…

Education
10
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
11
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
12
Avodah the Jewish Service Corps Inc

Avodah develops lifelong social justice leaders whose work is informed by jewish values and who inspire the jewish community to work toward a more just and equitable world.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Arthur Szyk Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Jewish Community FederationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Government Accountability R…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Cancer Support OrganizationsVeteran Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%49%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,529

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHABAD — $5,200 · OtherCHABADJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATL SECUR AFF — $4,000 · OtherJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATL SECUR AFFTHE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY — $2,000 · OtherJEWISH WAR VETERANS OF USA — $2,000 · OtherCHABADORG — $1,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,800 · OtherJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL — $1,780 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,360 · Other+36 more — $18,230 · Other+36 moreCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC — $25,500 · ReligionCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL …ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA — $2,000 · ReligionZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC — $1,000 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $1,000 · ReligionTHE AURELIA FOUNDATION — $15,150 · PhilanthropyTHE AURELIA FOUND…FEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,000 · PhilanthropyFEED ISRAEL FOUND…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $4,000 · InternationalJEWISH NAT…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $3,000 · InternationalAMERICAN F…COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC — $2,000 · InternationalCOMMITTEE …AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC — $1,000 · InternationalAMERICAN C…ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $6,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $200 · Civil RightsAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureWESTERN STATES JEWISH HISTORY — $500 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $1,000 · Human ServicesVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $500 · Human Services
Other$38,170Religion$29,500Philanthropy$16,150International$10,000Civil Rights$7,200Arts & Culture$2,500Human Services$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC — $25,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AURELIA FOUNDATION — $15,150 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOSTON UNIVERSITY HILLEL INC — $1,180 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARC California — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN STATES JEWISH HISTORY — $500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON LATIN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDISABILITY RIGHTS CALIFORNIA — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInfact DBA Corporate Accountability — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF SILICON VALLEY INC — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Arthur Szyk Society — $100 over 2y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Paris Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc2% of income from government
  • Infact Dba Corporate Accountability0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Paris Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Paris Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph