Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pamela Whitcomb Larsen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$440kReligion$430kHuman Services$350kFood & Nutrition$283kHealth$250kEnvironment$88kPhilanthropy$25kEducation$5k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COALITION FOR CHRISTIAN OUTREACH$30,000
PKD FOUNDATION$30,000
CRADLES TO CRAYONS$30,000
GLOBAL LINKS$25,000
SHRINERS INTERNATIONAL$20,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$15,000
MILLIS ECUMENICAL FOOD PANTRY$10,000
MEDFIELD FOOD CUPBOARD$10,000
CONVOY OF HOPE$10,000
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$10,000
TIDELINES$10,000
ARISE RWANDA MINISTRIES INC$5,000
HERRING GUT COASTAL SCIENCE CENTER$5,000
HOLLISTON FOOD PANTRY$5,000
DOORWAYS FOOD PANTRY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $335k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $30k → 16%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $30k → 16%MEDFIELD FOOD CUPBOARD: $10k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $30k → 16%MEDFIELD FOOD CUPBOARD: $10k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $30k → 16%MEDFIELD FOOD CUPBOARD: $10k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $25k → 16%MEDFIELD FOOD CUPBOARD: $10k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $25k → 16%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $25k → 16%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $25k → 16%MEDFIELD FOOD CUPBOARD: $10k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $25k → 16%MEDFIELD FOOD CUPBOARD: $10k → 7%MEDFIELD FOOD CUPBOARD: $10k → 7%MEDFIELD FOOD CUPBOARD: $10k → 7%MEDFIELD FOOD CUPBOARD: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
MA
OR
PA
CT
MO
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 16 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$1.8M
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+152%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PKD Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $250k · revenue +90%
  • CT
    CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $245k · revenue +202%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $170k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • HI
    Hand in Hand Mano en Manograduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +152%
  • GR
    GEORGES RIVER EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Concern International

Pci is a global development organization that drives innovation from the ground up to enhance health end hunger, overcome hardship and advance women & girls-resulting in meaningful and measurable change in people's lives.

International
2
Gardens for Health International

Gardens for Health International works to provide lasting agricultural solutions to chronic childhood malnutrition

International
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
World Hunger Relief Institute

World hunger relief institute equips people to alleviate hunger through education, research, and sustainable agriculture.

International
5
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
6
Coastal Enterprises Inc

Cei integrates financing, small business and industry expertise, and policy solutions to grow a vibrant future for people and communities in maine and rural regions.

Housing & Shelter
7
Food Link Inc

Food link is working to create a more equitable food system throughout greater boston by rescuing and distributing high-quality, customized food to under-resourced communities and by advocating for systems change.

Food & Nutrition
8
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
9
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
10
Maine Donor Alliance Fund

To build a permanent and powerful progressive movement in Maine. We will promote a healthy, just, equitable democracy through research, engagement, and education of Maine's citizens. We will engage in democracy expansion, voter engagement,…

Education
11
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cradles to Crayons Inc; the most unlike its peers is Medfield Food Cupboard. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PKD Foundation: $250,000 · OtherPKD FoundationCOALITION FOR CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $245,000 · OtherCOALITION FOR CHRISTIAN OUTREACHSHRINERS INTERNATIONAL: $185,000 · OtherSHRINERS INTERNATIONALAmilia's Light Inc: $105,000 · OtherAmilia's Light IncGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $90,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCTIDELINES: $51,000 · OtherMILLIS ECUMENICAL FOOD PANTRY: $45,000 · OtherARISE RWANDA MINISTRIES INC: $35,000 · Other+3 more: $35,000 · OtherGLOBAL LINKS: $235,000 · InternationalGLOBAL LINKSSave The Children Federation Inc: $170,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federat…CONVOY OF HOPE: $20,000 · InternationalCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $245,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS I…MEDFIELD FOOD CUPBOARD: $90,000 · Human ServicesMEDFIELD FOOD CUPBOA…TIDELINES INSTITUTE: $22,000 · EducationHand in Hand Mano en Mano: $8,400 · EducationCommunity Foundation for MetroWest Inc: $25,000 · PhilanthropyHERRING GUT COASTAL SCIENCE CENTER: $15,000 · Environment
Other$1,041,000International$425,000Human Services$335,000Education$30,400Philanthropy$25,000Environment$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPKD Foundation: $250,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $245,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION FOR CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $245,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL LINKS: $235,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $170,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmilia's Light Inc: $105,000 over 8y, 81% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDFIELD FOOD CUPBOARD: $90,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetARISE RWANDA MINISTRIES INC: $35,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCommunity Foundation for MetroWest Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTIDELINES INSTITUTE: $22,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetHERRING GUT COASTAL SCIENCE CENTER: $15,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetHand in Hand Mano en Mano: $8,400 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PKD Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR CHRISTIAN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL LINKS ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Amilia's Light Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDFIELD FOOD CUPBOARD ↗
  • Who funds ARISE RWANDA MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc ↗
  • Who funds TIDELINES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds HERRING GUT COASTAL SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Hand in Hand Mano en Mano ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Whitcomb Charitable FoundationCO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pamela Whitcomb Larsen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pamela Whitcomb Larsen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Medfield Food Cupboard: 6% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pamela Whitcomb Larsen Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Pamela Whitcomb Larsen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pamela Whitcomb Larsen’s filings →

More from the funding graph