Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pamela Anderson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$500
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$68kAnimals$40kInternational$29kEnvironment$20kEducation$18kYouth Development$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kCivil Rights$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$611
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 67% of grant dollars ($139k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 33% that went abroad ($70k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WAVES FOR WATER INC: $5k → 14%NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE: $30k → 10%NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE: $28k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 33% of all-years giving ($70k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$36k · 8 grants
Netherlands$20k · 1 grant
Croatia$10k · 1 grant
Austria$4k · 2 grants
United Kingdom$999 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 71% of Pamela Anderson Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 18% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 12%.

Pamela Anderson Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 39% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$82k · 3 repeat orgs$127k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +170% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
19

Total granted

$82k
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+170%
+8%

Still filing today

67%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE
    3× · 2017–2020 · $68k · revenue +170%
  • CH
    CONSERVANCY HORNBY ISLAND
    2× · 2020–2023 · $8k
  • RT
    RETURN TO FREEDOM INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $6k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • PP
    POLARIS PROJECT
    one grant, 2017 · $28k · revenue -11%
  • SS
    SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • PT
    PRISM THE GIFT FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wildlife Protection Solutions

To protect endangered species.

Animals
2
Wild Orca

Translating science into action to save Southern Resident killer whales from extinction.

Animals
3
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
4
Orca Conservancy

Orca conservancy is working on behalf of orcinus orca, the killer whale, and protecting the wild places on which it depends.

Animals
5
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
6
Asia Wild

Asia Wild is committed to rescuing and protecting the welfare of animals worldwide. They support small, locally-focused organizations that tirelessly combat numerous issues that threaten wildlife survival, including poaching, abuse,…

Animals
7
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
8
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
9
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
10
Clean Oceans International

Our Mission: Reduce oceanic plastic pollution through Research, Innovation, and Direct Action.

Science & Tech
11
Ocean Doctor Inc

Advance the conservation of the world's oceans through scientific, research, education and community engagement.

Environment
12
Friends of the Sea Lions Inc Dba Pacific Marine Mammal Center

The organization inspires ocean stewardship through animal rescue and rehabilitation, marine mammal research, stem education programs and advocacy for a healthy ocean.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Polaris Project; the most unlike its peers is Ocean Voyages Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $19,520 · OtherSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETYPRISM THE GIFT FUND: $10,000 · OtherPRISM THE GIFT FUNDISLAND SCHOOL FOR STUDYING AUTONOMY (ISSA): $10,000 · OtherISLAND SCHOOL FOR STUDYING AUTONOMY (ISSA)Ocean Voyages Institute: $10,000 · OtherOcean Voyages InstituteCONSERVANCY HORNBY ISLAND: $8,281 · OtherCONSERVANCY HORNBY ISLANDISLAND WILDLIFE NATURAL CARE CENTRE: $8,115 · OtherISLAND WILDLIFE NATURAL CARE CENTREVANCOUVER ISLAND UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7,600 · OtherVANCOUVER ISLAND UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONRASTA: $6,505 · OtherRASTACLAYOQUOT ACTION SOCIETY: $3,923 · Other+6 more: $6,966 · Other+6 moreNATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE: $68,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINEWAVES FOR WATER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesWAVES FOR WATER INCPOLARIS PROJECT: $28,000 · InternationalPOLARIS PROJECTRETURN TO FREEDOM INC: $5,500 · AnimalsAKASHINGA INC: $5,000 · AnimalsSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $1,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $500 · AnimalsCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT: $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$90,910Human Services$73,000International$28,000Animals$12,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE: $68,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $28,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOcean Voyages Institute: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetRETURN TO FREEDOM INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWAVES FOR WATER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAKASHINGA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE ↗
  • Who funds POLARIS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Ocean Voyages Institute ↗
  • Who funds RETURN TO FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds CORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT ↗
  • Who funds WAVES FOR WATER INC ↗
  • Who funds AKASHINGA INC ↗
  • Who funds SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA11.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pamela Anderson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pamela Anderson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pamela Anderson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pamela Anderson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pamela Anderson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph